Driverless Driving Vs Car-To-Car Communication

Imagine a future with zero car accidents and taking a nap while going down the road. Imagine a future where there are no drivers, only passengers. And not just that, but imagine not worrying about having accidents or high insurance payments. With driverless vehicles, car accidents will drastically diminish and insurance rates will decrease, meaning they could have a better impact on the economy. Driverless vehicles will benefit society given that they will reduce accidents, can improve traffic flow by enhancing its efficiency, and protect the environment from harmful fuel emissions.

“Whether you think you can or think you can’t, you’re right!” Henry ford said this to us and was able to prove it when he created the Model T car. Nobody thought it was possible to create a more reliable, affordable car but he knew he could, and he did it. Throughout the years we have been able to create newer technology for our cars making them safer, faster, and more affordable. Our technology has grown so much, that we have been able to create driverless cars. These cars are able to sense their surroundings around them, and drive without human association. But this raises a question for many, can a computer system replace a human at the wheel?

The use of IoT in the development of autonomous vehicles has led to the general reduction of fatalities (Sheng et.al, 2013). The reduction of fatalities is from the following aspects of driverless cars which are improved on by the use of IoT in the vehicle technology.

Everyone should have a driverless car because it could improve safety in driving. The article “25 Shocking Distracted Driving Statistics” Kiernan Hopkins says “330,000 accidents a year are caused by texting and driving, 11 teens die every day from it.” It would also cut down on drunk driving. According to self driving technology company, waymo, “9,967 people die from drunk driving and 1.25 million deaths worldwide from car crashes in 2014.” this shows that driverless cars increase safety.

Likewise, both articles promote driverless cars over human drivers because of the safety they provide. The article “Google Cars Becoming Safer: Let the Robots Drive“ says, “only 16 accidents have occurred over the last five years with Google Cars and most have been due to human drivers rear-ending the driverless cars”(Salkever). According to this article, humans are easily distracted by virtually the simplest things and the driverless cars would be constantly vigilant. This article notes that a human 's brain does not multitask very well, even with things like a hands free device

At the turn of the 20th century, serious debate raged in courtrooms and newspapers over whether the automobile was inherently evil. In 1907, one court compared automobiles to "ferocious animals" whose owners should be liable for their actions, with the crucial note that "it is not the ferocity of automobiles that is to be feared, but the ferocity of those who drive them." Even now, one of the biggest attractions of autonomous vehicles is the prospect of getting negligent motorists out of the driver's seat. But in terms of the effect on car accident cases, that's just the start.

Driverless cars. Who would ever think of putting these death machines on the road? If driverless cars are the norm on the road, then many more lives would be put in danger. Although some may say that driverless cars can be very comfortable on the way to work or anywhere else, they can cause more accidents than there already are. Some people may also think that during the commute to work it would be relaxing because they can read a book or even watch a movie. Once again, there are enough car crashes in the first place and we don’t need anymore. Straight up driverless cars should not be the norm on the

For people who live out of a city a driverless car would be the best thing cause you wouldn't be the one driving the car would do it for you. Some people would prefer to live further out of the city with driverless cars. It would make longer trips much better without taking stops for the driver to take a break.

As the decades progressed so, too, did technology. Technology has been a huge part of the future, bringing advancement and efficient products for the consumers. For several years' cars has been the main way to transport from place to place and people now are trying to create an accessible car to succeed everyone's different point of view. Although driving cars and driverless cars share similarities, driverless cars are more efficient because they are built to be safer, comfortable, and more affordable to the consumer of the car. Driverless cars are tediously built to be safer other than making them faster or more efficient to save money on fuel.

Is technology taking over humans? Can this lead into something good or bad? New technology will eventually happen to fit into society with all its pros and cons.A driver less car and delivery robot can bring some benefits to humanity, but there are some cons to these new inventions.The article “Google achieves milestone in driverless car technology development” written by Ashley Halsey III and Michael Laris tells the reader about the first car to drive on its own, and how this is changing the future .Google has made a car that drives itself without anyone on the steering wheel “Steve Mahan” is the first person to get on this car by himself; Google’s engineers test the “Waymo driverless car” to make sure it is safe for Mahan to attend on his

Not only will driverless vehicles save people money, but they will save lives in the process. According to ASIRT, a non-profit humanitarian organization that promotes road safety, 1.3 million people die from a car crash per year in the world, which is on average 3,287 per day (“Road Crash Statistics”). On top of that number, 20-50 million are disabled or injured per year, and car crashes are the ninth leading cause of death (“Road Crash Statistics”). The reason for these crashes could possibly be car troubles while driving, like the brakes not working or hitting a pothole, but the number one cause of crashes is being distracted. “According to one analysis, 4 million of the nearly 11 million crashes that occur annually could potentially be avoided if distractions were eliminated” (Pelini). Another study has shown that when typing or reading on a phone while driving adversely affects one’s stimulus detection time, reaction time, lane positioning, vehicle control, and increases the chance of a collision (Pelini). With the use of driverless vehicles people could be on their phones while driving and not be in any danger of crashing. Distracted drivers and even drunk drivers will be eliminated if driverless vehicles are implemented into society, it’s just a matter of time when they will become the social

I don't support driverless cars .What if a computer malfunctions and instinct people get injured. Most of the insurance companies will go out of business. It will also ruin the experience for kids for driving.

I am for driverless cars, Driverless cars allow people to get usually anywhere. Technology now days is really interesting it is a serious thing here, especially in the United States it is very useful . Driverless cars were a really nice and creative activity. All though there are some pros and cons. Driverless cars are really useful,they can also be used while you’re under age, they’re really cool because you can also rest in them if you're tired.

Nobody knows what public opinion will be on driverless cars. It raises some questions such as own vs. subscribe: maybe subscribing to a driverless car network becomes more popular than individual consumers owning and leasing their own cars. It opens up legal loopholes: are drivers liable for any accidents that may incur while the driverless car is operating of its own accord? Are manufacturers liable? Dealerships? Of course with the unknown market for driverless cars, some aspects of the innovator’s dilemma are highlighted. Profit, market share, time before consumer availability is unknown. As a mid-tier car manufacturer, assuming I am in the US, I would probably jump on this new tech as soon as possible. Despite the risks, car companies in the United States are buckling from pressure of luxury cars from Europe and reliable cars from Japan. Simply being American-made is not reason enough to justify trying to maintain longevity in a crowded market. Many companies in all markets and industries are shifting increasingly to the digital world. With cloud computing, companies have the potential to aggregate as much useful data as they want with competitively priced storage options and portability of uploading and downloading data. Data that car companies could use to strengthen the logic of the computing unit in their

People that are blind could then have the ability to drive wherever they so choose. In addition, people who use a wheelchair every day could simply roll up to the car and go. Driverless cars would drastically cut traffic tickets in half. You would also have more time for other things while your car is driving you such as working on homework, talking on the phone, drinking coffee, and the list goes on and on.