End The Gun Epidemic In America Summary

In the article “ shooting our way out of a gun epidemic” (2017), Renee Graham claims that gun violence in America has reached another level. Graham supports her claim by making various references the the many mass shootings, comments made by our president and previous president. Renee explains that legislators should now regret voting to expand the right to carry concealed weapons. Graham goes on to say that after this vote by the house of representatives, the worst mass shooting in modern history in Las vegas and soon after a churchgoer in texas took place. The author’s purpose is to argue that america has become very trigger happy due to the stress of the right to carry an concealed weapon. She also mentions that congress has done nothing

In this article, Greenhaven Press, is an American publishing company which mainly publishes books on social issues, a part of Gale, Cengage Learning, explains how an improvement of stronger gun control law will save lives. Green haven Press, faults that some gun-control laws are usually board and leaves room for loopholes. Greenhaven Press, developed their thesis by citing statistical facts, the District of Columbia v. Heller case, and quotes from the Second Amendment and the Brandy Act to show how gun-control laws came about and developed flaws through-out time. Greenhaven press’s research shows that the production of the black market of guns would never die out and the only way to keep structure within the American society is to make stronger

The New York Times Editorial board stated their displeasure with the way the gun laws have been handled in their article End the Gun Epidemic in America. The article discusses how after the shooting in San Bernardino, California the elected leaders of this country give the same speech offering prayers to the victims and then reject the “most basic restrictions.” In this article the authors describe killing sprees as “acts of terrorism” and how the leaders of this country do nothing to top these incidents. Although they are not extremists of this topic. They don’t wish to outlaw guns as a whole but just the automatic weapons used in war. These writers are definitely pro gun control, and had an effective way explaining their position.

In their article End the Gun Epidemic in America the editorial board states how certain weapons and ammo need to be “outlawed”. Yes some of their arguments are convincing but most of them are not. The editorial group uses comparison, storytelling, and addressing objections to their arguments to try to convince you more, but most of them do not work in their favor.

Editorial Board. "End the Gun Epidemic In America”. New York Times. New York Times.com, 5 December 2015. Web. 11 Nov. 2016

It mentions several mass school shootings involving children and how common this has become. The author believes the government is showing to be incentive to their lives by not putting better gun laws in place. The author has a strong opinion against the Republicans and blames them for the deaths. Although, this article focuses more on how the government should fix the issue, it could still prove useful in the essay. This information on current gun laws could be used as background to the cause of the problem being addressed in the essay. It may be able to bring a stronger emotion to the essay to making people realize since the government is not doing anything we must take it into our own hands. However, the idea of creating stricter gun laws should be a focused solution in the essay, since people do not have much control over

Say your worst fear comes into play; a robber has declared war onto your home. Someone has invaded your safe place to steal your belongings and hurt your family. What would you do? Would you want to be vulnerable and defenseless, or would you want to have a weapon to protect yourself? I for one, would like to possess a gun to protect myself. The Bill of Rights is the basic rights we are granted as American citizens. I disagree with the article “End the Gun Epidemic in America,” for a multitude of reasons. This article claims that the answer to stopping heinous crimes in America is to ban guns or at least have serious restrictions and regulations on them. On the contrary, I believe banning guns leaves citizens defenseless while presenting criminals with a greater field of opportunity.

Medlock explains his point of view is for the gun control in the U.S. He goes on to explaining this is the only rational explanation to help reduce deaths in the U.S. by shotgun and other guns. He goes as far though to explain why people are unsure about banning guns is because of the NRA or the National Rifle Association. He goes on explaining after major events, such as 911, people are frantic to obtain guns to feel protected, but “Numerous studies show that the presence of a firearm in the home increases the likelihood of violence against family members.”(Medlock 39). The NRA though fights every known regulation against guns and persuades people to follow. The NRA also persists to manipulate the facts sent out to people about gun control.These

The future of America is based off the choices of my generation and the generations after. I feel that a domestic policy issue that could have a strong impact on my generation’s future is gun control because we take advantage of guns and treat them like toys. Gun violence is at an all-time high and regulating gun usage could make my peers make better choices regarding guns, which could possibly decrease the amount of deaths due to gun violence.

Gun Violence is a major problem in the United States, it leads to a lot of deaths every day. The area of focus is the United States of America. More controls need to be put on guns to make America a safer nation. More than 30,000 people are killed each year in this country due to guns. There are some questions that haven’t been answered like, Amendments that need to be made to reduce the availability of guns. At the point when American threats with Britain began on April 19, 1775, the Continental Congress had no standing armed force, no stores of weapons and munitions, no naval force, and no navy ships. The Continental Congress revitalized volunteers to join the battle against the British. Farmers and tradesmen conveying their own black powder guns framed a volunteer army along the street from Boston to Concord, Massachusetts, discharged the first shot of the Revolution, and battled again on Bunker Hill in Charlestown on June 17. As a result, the Constitution of the United States was embraced in 1787 on the condition that a Bill of Rights would be included. The initial Ten Amendments to the Constitution, including the Second Amendment, were sanctioned by Congress on December 15, 1791. The Second Amendment states: A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed. The historical backdrop of

Don Henley once said,“A man with a briefcase can steal millions more than any man with a gun.” This means that some violence that become something you may once think is regular but it . It gives evidence that some things come in lies while others are seen directly. This is very tragic because this is not controlled and it affects other innocent lives.Many people don't see the harm and dangers these objects may have in the hands of immature handling people .That is the issue the government is having to interfere with some civilians about Gun Control. They don’t know how to handle something in their hand without affecting the world of innocence.

The high rates of gun violence and accidents in the United States have long aroused public concern, in view of the strong correlation between gun prevalence, many people believe that the United States must adopt stricter gun control measures to reduce the huge number of firearms across the nation. These people are known as gun control proponents, or advocates. However, many other people do not think so. In their eyes, the serious firearm problems do not result from gun prevalence, and many people would say it is not gun’s problem, people are pushing our

In the past year, I am sure that you have heard about the issue of gun control. Well, do you really know the full story behind the debate? My goal for this essay is to fully explain everything to you behind this issue and why it is such a big deal in our world today. There are many different problems behind why gun control is such a big issue in the world today, and why some people want gun control and others do not. Through these contrasting opinions on gun control, the world will never fully decide what is completely right.

Living a life in America, we all get to have all the rights that included in the Constitution. One of those was the Second Amendment which is the rights to bear arm, the purpose was to protect ourselves from danger but nowadays a lot of people have take advantage of it and use it in the wrong way. I believe our government need to have a strict limit on guns possession.

There are gun control laws to try and reduce the number of violent shootings that occur. They are trying to put limits on weapons that Americans can own. The government is trying to take our guns away mainly because of people that are criminally insane. Most of the people who commit crimes don’t even have the weapons legally. If the government takes away the rights of people who are allowed to have firearms in their possession, it will most definitely cause an outrage. Most people believe that the people should be more capable of maintain proper use of the firearms instead of having them all taken away. Taking the firearms from Americans away would cause a lot more problems than there actually are. The people will be upset with the