Epicurus And Lucretius Essay

Decent Essays

The circumstance of one’s death determines the stature of the experience. The shared account of Epicurus and Lucretius unravel the merit of death, in the Philosophy and Death. There shared view is contrasted by the piece by Nagel. It is important to note that all three accounts are assuming the soul ceases to exist when the body perishes. Epicurus’ explanation is centered around death being nothing to humans, since the sense experience is deprived through death. This concedes, there is nothing in death and this should encourage one to seek happiness in life—the fear of death is irrational (Epicurus 164). Additionally, Lucretius furthers the point of Epicurus through his theory of the body and soul being one and mortal, therefore, death “is …show more content…

Nagel’s account draws the most concerns. He believes life is intrinsically good which is not true (Nagel 178). Many accept death over life, since life is embroiled with terminal illnesses which can be the means of a life of pain. Consequently, his account can be determined as blissful ignorance—with no recognition to those with dysthymia, cancer, and other conditions which have no relational good. Another flaw in his argument is his failure to recognize that deprivation can be favorable. To be deprived of the evils in life can only be assumed as a good. Correspondingly, it is unreasonable to claim all deprivation as evil, especially when using potential as an argument—potential can be the means for good or evil. Overall, the shared account of Epicurus and Lucretius contradicts the entire account of Nagel through their conviction that what one does not experience has no effect on the person. If a person does not have an awareness of the deprivation of potential, then it is not bad.

Neither views on death answer its question of status as good or bad. The circumstance in which the person who dies is relevant to determine the principle of death. By the doctrine of Nagel, one is to assume that life is intrinsically good, which under certain circumstances is clearly proven as a flaw (Nagel 178). From the previous discussion about terminal illnesses and depression, there are times where one sees

Get Access