The true monster in Mary Shelley’s Frankenstein is not clearly defined. An argument can be made for each individual to be labeled the monster. I am going to theorize that all three are the actual monster in their own magnificent way.
Victor Frankenstein is the monster: Through his absolute desire at playing God, he created life from non-living matter. His scientific ability is astounding, but the result was grotesque and freakish. I am not sure what Victor expected when he first gazed upon his creation but his utter resentment and disgust catapulted this simple-minded being into total rage and evil. Victor’s actions went unchecked and he neglected to fulfill his obligation as father to this creature. Victor is the monster for creating
…show more content…
A lot can be said about how the people’s reaction to the creature molded his perception and altered his behavior. In this book, society refuses to accept Frankenstein’s creation purely based on his abnormal size and grotesque features. This sentiment isn’t unusual; even to this day, segments of society react to physical and emotional abnormalities through scathing remarks and rejection.
Frankenstein’s monster was met by scorn and violent beatings at every turn; society never gave him a chance. When the monster would expose his softer more compassionate side by saving a drowning girl, he was greeted with gunfire. The actions of society provided the fuel of evil; Frankenstein’s monster was purely the vessel. Society is the monster by casting the first stone, creating an unwelcoming atmosphere, and teaching hatred.
The monster is the monster: Frankenstein’s monster carried out vicious attacks against innocent people. He lashed out against Victor by killing his brother and wife; all which are heinous crimes. Sure he is a product of his environment, but he is still accountable for his actions. The evil inside the monster is apparent and visible through his blood-lust and rage while exacting revenge on Victor
Mary Shelley’s “Frankenstein” is a book with a deep message that touches to the very heart. This message implies that the reader will not see the story only from the perspective of the narrator but also reveal numerous hidden opinions and form a personal interpretation of the novel. One of its primary statements is that no one is born a monster and a “monster” is created throughout socialization, and the process of socialization starts from the contact with the “creator”. It is Victor Frankenstein that could not take the responsibility for his creature and was not able to take care of his “child”. Pride and vanity were the qualities that directed
What is a monster, really? Is it really a Creature that has three eyes instead of two, with pus seeping out of every crevice in his face and an abnormally large form? Or is it someone with a mind so corrupt it rivals that of Satan? Mary Shelley’s Frankenstein is a story within a story that centers on the tale of a man with an immense thirst of knowledge and a fetish to imitate the Creator. Mary Shelley’s Frankenstein is a lot like the Greek mythological tale of the Greek God, Prometheus, and his brother, Epimetheus, who were assigned the task of creating man. The story captivates the theme of monstrosity. Mary Shelley wrote the novel in a form so the reader’s opinions never stray far from sympathy for the monster and apathy for Victor
Mary Shelley’s Frankenstein tells the tale of a man whose entire life turns to misery after creating what he calls a monster, a demon and a fiend. However, the real monster in this story is pride and the feeling of superiority. This is evident in the novel with Robert Walton’s view of himself and his expedition, Victor Frankenstein’s attitude towards himself in comparison with the creature, and mankind’s perception of the creature and their ignorance towards him.
Victor Frankenstein created life, a monster that was born into this world with no purpose, and no one to love. He did not even have a name, he was called a monster from the start. Just like a normal human baby, he came to life not knowing anything, and had to learn from his surroundings. Just like a person, he watched and learned from others, and tried to understand the world and the people in it. From that, the monster understood that he just wants to find a life for himself, and not be viewed as an evil monster, but there are many things that are preventing that. In the novel Frankenstein by Mary Shelley, the author portrays Frankenstein’s monster as a friend through details in his character and his outlook on life.
Mary Shelley’s ability to create such multidimensional characters in Frankenstein proves that writing is a powerful tool that has the ability to provoke vastly different opinions amongst readers. Even though each individual reading the story is reading the exact same words, their interpretation of those words often leads to opposing views in regards to the fate of the characters. The creature, in particular, has been a popular topic of discussion when conducting a close read of the novel due to his arguable versatility as a victim and villain. The concept of the villain has evolved over the years, however its basis still rests upon the simple fact that as a character in the story, their actions are a result of malicious intentions
At first glance, the monster in Frankenstein is a symbol of evil, whose only desire is to ruin lives. He has been called "A creature that wreaks havoc by destroying innocent lives often without remorse. He can be viewed as the antagonist, the element Victor must overcome to restore balance and tranquility to the world." But after the novel is looked at on different levels, one becomes aware that the creature wasn't responsible for his actions, and was just a victim of circumstance. The real villain of Frankenstein isn't the creature, but rather his creator, Victor.
Though Victor Frankenstein and his creation both have qualities that are clearly monstrous, Victor’s selfishness, his abandonment of his responsibilities, and his inability to recognize his own faults and the monstrous qualities within himself qualities within himself make him the true monster while his creation is rather the opposite.
Thesis Statement: In Mary Shelley’s Frankenstein, the creature’s identity as a monster is due to societal rejection, isolation, and misinterpretation.
In the novel by Mary Shelley, Frankenstein, the creature and its creator, Victor Frankenstein, share a lot of similarities throughout the story. The relationship shared between the two resembles that of a father and his son. Since Victor created it , the creature inherits certain traits of Victor’s without realizing it. Victor and the creature both have an overpowering thirst for knowledge, a love for the beauty of nature and a tendency to use it as a scapegoat, a depressing feeling of isolation from people, a desire for revenge, and the ability to play God. The relationship between Victor and the creature does not develop like a normal father-son relationship, nor does it develop as a good versus evil relationship. Both characters show hero and villain qualities throughout the novel as their relationship develops.
People are sometimes misunderstood because of the norms of society. In the book Frankenstein, written by Mary Shelly, the main protagonist is Dr. Frankenstein, who bestows life into his monster and this monster begins to learn and understand his world better, throughout the story, the reader learns about Frankenstein and his family. But, the monster is rejected by everyone. He comes to Frankenstein to pleads him to build him a wife. He reluctantly agrees, but eventually leaves the project. Because of this, the monster swears to get his revenge on him because of how miserable and depressing he made his life. So, he goes and beings to slowly kill everyone Frankenstein cares about. The whole book was caused because of society. This idea of society is explicit in the novel, when the monster goes out into the world and understands he is extremely ugly. This causes people to be scared and flee or attack him on different occasions. This here conveys the idea that society molds people. During the novel of Frankenstein, Mary Shelly is trying to portray the messages of society makes people into who they truly are, that appearances cause people to view others differently and that people have a hidden demon lurking inside of them.
Like most horror stories, Mary Shelley’s Frankenstein has a wretched monster who terrorizes and kills his victims with ease. However, the story is not as simple as it seems. One increasingly popular view of the true nature of the creature is one of understanding. This sympathetic view is often strengthened by looking at the upbringing of the creature in the harsh world in which he matures much as a child would. With no friends or even a true father, the creature can be said to be a product of society and its negative views and constant rejections of him. Although this popular view serves to lessen the severity of his crimes in most people’s eyes, the fact remains that the creature is in fact a cold-hearted wretch whose vindictive nature
“ People fear what they do not understand. ” In the original 1888 edition of Mary Shelley’s Frankenstein, this saying is excessively shown throughout the journey of Frankenstein himself and his creation known as “ the creature.” Fear is spreaded in this famous, gothic novel because the epitome of society is lacked by both the creator and the creation, leading to much misunderstanding with who is the real monster. In this novel, the true monster is society because the ideals indirectly presented led Frankenstein to abhor and abandon the creature, the ultimate isolation of both, and the delirious vengeance developed by the two.
The monster is hurt,so he swears revenge on Victor. The monster kills his family and friends. Victor ends up dieing, and shortly after the monster commits suicide. Victor Frankenstein is the true monster of the story because of his selfish actions, his judgmental attitude, and he was rude to the monster.
Knowing social opinion, the monster explained after his agonizing shock of self-discovery, "All men hate the wretched" (95). An irony emerges, however, in Frankenstein's own abhorrence of the creature, evident when the brute proclaims, "You accuse me of murder, and yet you would, with a satisfied conscience, destroy your own creature. Oh, praise the eternal justice of man!" (96). This fictitious novel, occurring in the early nineteenth century, only years after the Declaration of Independence, Bill of Rights, and the Constitution of the Rights of Man commissioned equality among people, exposes inequitable sentiment remaining in mankind. The brute fiend, which had commiserated with kind cottagers early on in his existence, aspired to acquire their friendship by degrees, but foretold his predestined misery by recounting, "Alas! I did not entirely know the fatal effects of this miserable deformity" (108). He had not pre-meditated his future crimes and is portrayed as a victim of appearance, circumstance, and naïveté.
The creature is renounced by Victor throughout the book, which removes any positive role model that the creature might have had. The two encounters that Victor has with the creature when it is first created are evidence of his rejection. The first is when Victor finishes creating the creature. During the process of creation, Victor dedicates himself so greatly that he "pursued [his] undertaking with unremitting ardour" (32). He puts aside everything else in his life, and concentrates completely on his purpose, which is to bring a being to life that would serve him. In order to do so, he spent an entire summer "engaged, heart and soul, in one pursuit" (32). Because of the hard work that Victor puts into his work of creation, he never really examines the fruits of his labour. He is too caught up in his work, and has "lost all soul or sensation but for this one pursuit" (32) of finishing his work on making the creature. So in the process of his creation, Victor is never really aware of what he is creating because he is too focused on the actual act of creation. However, when Victor finally finishes the work of making the creature, and takes time to look at what he has done, he is horrified by his accomplishment. As the creation opens an eye, and