LIntroduction
The purpose of this report is to highlight and assess the financial strength of Estee Lauder. This report will cover Estee Lauder’s Profitability, Liquidity, Leverage and Activity Ratios, which will be 19 key ratios. Secondly, these ratios will be interpreted to evaluate the current performance of the company with its historic figures of prior three years. Lastly, all these ratios will be compared with Cosmetics and Beauty Industry average and its competitor L’Oreal in 2012.
Table # 1 Summary of Key Financial Ratios of Estee Lauder Estee Lauder Financial Ratios | RATIOS | (MRQ)2012 | FY 2011 | FY 2010 | Industry | L’Oreal SA. | Profitability Ratios % | | | | | | Gross Profit Margin | 80.40% | 78.01% |
…show more content…
The growing number shows that the company is running better than before. The ratio of 8.82% in 2012 indicates that for every dollar of sales generated, Estee Lauder retains 8 cents in earnings. However, the margin is below the industry average (10.75%) and competitor L’Oreal (11.99%). Estee Lauder’s return on total assets is upward trend. Compared to the industry average (1.83%), Estee Lauder is performing better, and more efficient than other companies in the industry. The high return on total assets indicates that the company is investing wisely and is likely profitable. Return on equity ratios measure the percentage of profit earned on common stockholders’ investment in the company. As the table shown, Estee Lauder is increasing on its return on equity. There is a significant success on Estee Lauder because the ratio 13.32% is almost ten times greater than the industry average and double the L’Oreal ratios. This indicates that for every dollar of shareholder’s equity, Estee Lauder is earning returns of 13 cents. Estee Lauder performs well in return on equity, which means the company is really well on reinvesting earnings to generate additional earnings. Return on invested capital is used to assess a company’s efficiency at allocating the capital under its control profitable investments. Estee Lauder is trending upward form 15.33% to 21.78%. Besides that, it is much greater than
Macy’s, Inc. is known as the Great American Department Store was established in 1858 and now has 810 stores operating in the United States, coast-to-coast. Macy’s stores nationwide are grouped into 69 geographic districts that average ten to twelve stores each. Most stores are located at urban or suburban areas. As of January 30, 2010, the Company’s operations were conducted through four retail operating divisions – Macy’s, macys.com, Bloomingdale’s, and bloomingdales.com. The Company is a retail organization operating retail stores and Internet websites under two brands (Macy’s and Bloomingdale’s) that sell a wide range of merchandise, including men’s, women’s and children’s apparel and accessories, cosmetics, home furnishings and other
* Return on assets (ROA) – ROA shows how successful a company is in generating profits on the amount of assets they own. Since assets consist of debt and equity, ROA is a measure of how well a company converts investment dollars into profit. The higher the percentage, the more profit a company is generating per dollar of investment. Similar to ROS, this ratio needs to be looked at compared to the industry as different industries have different requirements that can affect ROA. For example, companies in the airline and mining industries need expensive assets to operate so will have lower ROA’s compared to companies in the pharmaceutical or advertising industries.
First of all, return on asset (ROA) is a ratio used to measure how efficient a company generates profit using its assets, which is the invested capital. We noticed that HH’s ROA was increasing from 2006 to 2010. However, HH’s ROA for 2011 dropped dramatically from 18.41%(year
The 6% Return on Assets percentage shows that Costco’s assets are being well-used to generating revenue. The ROE demonstrates $0.13 of profit for every dollar of net assets.
Now to find the return on equity (ROE), I chose to add the average of the Dividend Growth and the Earnings Per Share Growth and use that as g. I decided that the Capital Gains Yield was much too low compared to the other values of "g" that I found and should be discarded from further calculations, considering it to be an outlier. The Reinvestment Returns yielded a value for "g" that is a little on the high end, but it is only based on
The Return on Equity ratio is a measure of the efficiency with which a company employs owners’ capital. It
When combining the figures for ROE, ROA and the DuPont analysis it appears that the company is using leverage favourably. ROE is greater than ROA and assets are greater than equity. This is a positive sign for shareholders as it suggests a good investment return in a company that is managing its shareholder equity well (Evans & McDowell, 2009).
Return on Assets (ROA) of 8.74% and Return on Equity (ROE) of 12.4% are both positive.
Return on Total Assets was 4.43% which is below five percent. That indicates that the company is not accurately converting its assets into profit. The total for Return on Stockholders’ Equity was 8.89%, however financial analysts prefer ROE to range between 15-20 %. The company’s low ROE indicates that the company is not generating profit with new investments. Lastly, Debt-to-Equity ratio for the company was 1.01 which indicates that investors and creditors are equally sharing assets. In the view of creditors, they see a high ratio as a risk factor because it can indicate that investors are not investing due to the company’s overall performance. The totals of these three ratios demonstrate that the company’s financial state is not as healthy as it should be.
Rate of Return on equity measures a corporation 's profitability by revealing how much profit a company generates with the money shareholders have invested. It indicates how efficiently the business uses its investment funds. For Tesco, Rate of Return on Shareholders’ Fund has increased from 13.85% in 2004 to 14.91% in 2009. This shows an improvement of 1.06% in five years period. When one examines the Sainsbury’s Rate of Return on Shareholders’ Fund, there is an increase from 7.76% to 8.36%. There is a 0.6% growth in the Rate of Return on Shareholders’ Fund. In comparison with Tesco, Sainsbury’s Rate of Return on Shareholders’ Fund is lower. Shareholders earned 13.85% from their investment (measured in book value
Financial data from past periods of a company, provides a perspective for future outcomes. Investors give proper attention to different ratios. In this report I am analyzing the financial position and financial performance of AT & T, a US. Telecommunication Company. The objective and conclusion of this analysis will be, if is either good or not to invest in the company.
During this period, the Return on Assets increased from 5.7% in 2012 to 34.6% in 2013. This implies the number of cents earned on each dollar of assets increased from 2012 to 2013. This shows that the business has become more profitable. Equally, the Return on Equity also increased from 12.0% in 2012 to 46.5% in 2013. This similarly implies that the company in 2013 was more efficient in generating income from new investment. This, also can be attributed to the sale of the Digital Business Brand which enabled the company appraise its strategic plan.
In this assignment, I have chosen Burberry as the company to report. Burberry is one of the global luxury brand leader with a long history. It operates in three regions, Asia Pacific, Europe , Middle East, India and Africa (EMEIA) and Americas. I am interested in the firm’s performance in recent years. I am going to measure and analysis the performance of the corporate through Annual report 2015/16 and 2016/17 which published on 06-06-16 and 06-06-17 respectively.
The return on equity, ROE, is as high as 20.69% (above 15%). It illustrate that the RL Corporation uses the investors’ money pretty effectively. As of return of assets, equals to 13.10%, which reveals how much profit a company earns for every dollar of its assets. Both ROE and ROA for RL Corporation seems really good and they provide a picture that managers are doing a good job of generating return from shareholders’ investments.
Ford earned $1.90 per share ending 2010. The company showed a 5% return on sales. A comparison of General Motors Company will show Ford’s performance when comparing this percentage. High risks in business either equates to high profits or high losses. Ford’s company’s return on equity of 109% shows that their risks proved to be profitable in the automobile industry in 2010 (“,” 2012).