preview

Evidence Of Insanity In Hamlet

Decent Essays

A person on trial has the option to plead insanity as an explanation for his or her criminal behavior. If the case of Shakespeare’s character Hamlet were brought to a court of law, the question of his insanity would be debated endlessly. The familiar character has been analyzed since the time the play was written in an attempt to discern the true madness, if there is any, from the feigned. With evidence to support both sides of the argument, one must weigh the value and relevance of each evident piece. Both sides of the argument are strongly supported; however, in Shakespeare’s Hamlet, the evidence against Hamlet most strongly suggests his actions were deceitfully intended and not the result of his insanity. Although Hamlet is a character …show more content…

Hamlet’s wild, incoherent behavior after discovering the truth of his father’s murder is expected of someone learning of such news. While nonsensical speech can be a sign of madness, in Hamlet’s situation it makes more sense to be a result of shock and anger. The fickle mood of Hamlet can also easily be explained away by the circumstances of his father’s death and his mother’s remarriage. It is understandable why Hamlet would be angry, even violent, with his mother. The short period of time between Hamlet’s father’s death and his mother’s remarriage was worsened by the remarriage being to Hamlet’s uncle. The news of Hamlet’s uncle being his father’s murderer further infuriated Hamlet. In the course of events in his mother’s chamber, Hamlet sees the ghost again, but his mother does not. Although this time Hamlet is the only one to see the ghost, others have seen it. Whether Hamlet actually sees the ghost the second time is impossible to know. It is likely that Hamlet pretended to see the ghost to frighten his …show more content…

Hamlet controls all of those aspects in such a way as to appear insane. Hamlet sets up his mad act by confiding in his close friend Horatio, telling him that he is going to “feign madness” (1.5.166). Horatio “neither by word nor act shows the slightest sign of a belief in his insanity” (Crawford). By alerting his friend of seemingly mad behaviors, Hamlet is able to retain a solid friendship with someone who can provide support. Hamlet later explains to his mother that he is not mad, “but mad in craft” (3.4.188). In addition to Horatio, Bernardo, Francisco, the Players, and the Gravediggers are characters around whom he behaves rationally. Hamlet’s madness is only noted in the presence of Polonius, Claudius, Gertrude, Ophelia, Rosencrantz, and Guildenstern (Was Hamlet Mad). Among the characters who experienced Hamlet’s madness firsthand, Claudius is one who confesses that although Hamlet’s actions seem strange, “do not appear to stem from madness” (3.1.165-167). However, Crawford writes, “But it serves his [the king’s] wicked purpose to declare him a madman, and to make this the excuse for getting rid of him by sending him to England.” Blackmore explains, “The consciousness of his [Claudius’s] guilt made him alert and, like a criminal ever fearing detection, he suspected the concealment of some evil design under Hamlet's mimic madness.” Polonius also notices that Hamlet’s actions and

Get Access