Example Of Accountable Care Organizations

Healthcare is often driven by consumers and insurance companies; there is strong pushes for insurance companies to start paying better through Patient Care Medical Homes (PCMH) or Accountable Care Organizations (ACO) rather than paying at a per-visit basis (Hamlin, 2015). With PCMH or ACOs payment is made on a continuum of care, encouraging the provider to be involved in all aspects affecting health of the patient (Derksen, & Whelan,

There has been discussion to have universal healthcare system similar to Medicare as a method to have a centralized monitoring system of cost. There have also been other systems tried beginning with HMOs in the 1970s in an effort to streamline access to necessary healthcare services by employing a gatekeeper to their access at the primary care levels. With patient dissatisfaction, PPOs were tried which circumvent the necessity of referrals (Hacker, 1998). Either of these models had substantial effect on healthcare outcomes while the cost of healthcare continued to skyrocket. The US spends more than any other country on healthcare but outcomes are not better (Blackstone, 2016). In 2010, under President Obama’s leadership, Affordable Care Act was passed and one of the promising features is the formation of accountable care

ACO, another 3 letter health care organization consisting of integrated groups of providers, comes along promising the elusive goal of reducing health care cost, improving population health, and bolstering custom satisfaction. Sounds like a perpetual remake of a 70s movie called HMO that went through several reiterations over the past decades which gave us PPO, PSO, IDS, and the different flavors of MCOs. ACO’s hype is credited to the Affordable Care Act as it sought to reduce health care costs is by encouraging doctors, hospitals and other health care providers to form networks that coordinate patient care and become eligible for bonuses when they deliver that care more efficiently. Bottom line, providers are promised to make more if they

Advance Payment Account Care Organization Model which focuses additional support to physician owned and rural providers participating in the Medicare Shared Savings Program by providing start-up resources to build better infrastructures throughout. The shared savings which the Accountable Care Organization (ACO) would be split in half and given back to the organization which provided the savings. In other words, in the case of my hometown hospital, if an ACO would take over and re-open our hospital, the predictions are that by retrieving these savings which are provided for by Obama-care, and by right-sizing our hospital from a 45 bed hospital to a 10 bed hospital and right-sizing the amount of employees, we would be back in the black within a 2 year period. That is a major step in financing this hospital to continue servicing a major part of the community which needs major health care to continue.

The concept of an Affordable accountable cCare oOrganization (ACO) is still evolving. Generally, an ACO is a group of health care providers (including primary care physicians, specialists, and medical facilities) that work in partnership and are collectively accountable for the cost and quality of health care they deliver to a specific population of patients. At the heart of each patient's care is a primary care physician.

Accountable care organizations (ACOs) are consist of providers who are jointly held accountable for achieving measured quality improvements and reductions in the rate of spending growth.

Health care in the United States (U.S.) is driven by a makeshift of services and financing. Americans access health care services in diverse ways, from private doctors’ offices, to hospitals, and to insurance providers. The effects of the ACA will have numerous changes impacting hospitals and physicians practices. One of the main goals of healthcare reform is to reduce Medicare expenses by combining payment for services provided by hospitals, doctors, and nursing homes into one lump sum, which will effect

Coordinated care is reminiscent of a Health Maintenance Organization (HMO); however, the difference between the two is that an ACO does not have a gatekeeper like HMOs thus patients are free to see whichever provider or specialist accepts his or her insurance. Another key difference between ACOs and traditional hospital and physician payment programs is how they are paid. As mentioned above, healthcare systems are rewarded for coordinated quality care that is not duplicated; essentially, the program rewards health systems for keeping patients out of the hospital. In an ACO, hospitals are fined for readmissions and rewarded for reducing costs and population health. Although that sounds great from a patient’s perspective, it is a huge culture and financial change in the business of healthcare. In a descriptive study performed by Epstein et al., they found, “…no differences in baseline quality between hospitals that participated in an ACO and those that did not…found only modest differences in baseline

There are three core principles to any ACOs. First, provider-led organizations with primary maintenance and a strong base are liable communally and total per capita costs for quality with full continuum for the population of care for patients. Second, excellent improvements will have linked to also have complete costs reduced, and third, progressively and reliable sophisticated measurement performance to improve, support, and provide the savings of confidence are achieved with improvements of care, , McClellan M, McKethan AN, Lewis JL, Roski J, Fisher ES (2010).

The medicare ACO strategy is based on the concept of reducing the medicare expenditure by moving from a provider fee for service model to a cost controlled model based on a defined network of doctors and hospitals that shares financial and medical responsibility for providing coordinated care to patients at a reduced or fixed price.

The American health care system has been victim to an escalation in the prices of health care services juxtaposed with inefficiency in delivery of care services. There has even been cases where State spending on the actual health care increased dramatically in the United States and one of the key components of curbing this problem which has been prevalent over the mass media and has been a major discussion among physicians is the advent of Accountable Care Organizations. Accountable Care Organizations (ACOs) is structured with the goal of trying to improve health care delivery and aid in the reduction of the overall cost of services (Weissert & Weissert, 2012). If there is insufficient coordination of high quality care delivery in the health care industry, this will have a negative impact on patient safety and diminish affordable care for patients. Hence, the development of ACOs is envisioned to be the savior of medical practices and can improve the overall fabric of the American society (Bresnick, 2013). ACOs serves as one of the answers for curbing the problem of high costs, low quality care and possible segmented delivery and as much as it serve as the major determinant for improvement in patient satisfaction, there are minor

Large hospitals have chosen to become ACO providers. Accountable Care Organization (ACO) which are of doctors, hospitals and other healthcare providers, which come together voluntarily to give coordinated high quality care to the Medicare patients they serve.

Managed care was established in order to manage health care cost, utilization, and quality (Kongstvedt, 2015). In managed care, health insurance is provided through HMO, PPO, and other types of managed care. It has the potential to reduced health care spending and improved the quality of care. However, despite of its success in improving the quality of care through preventive health care services, chronic disease management program, and so forth, many physicians are reluctant to be part of the managed care environment. Some of the reasons are the impact of managed care to physician’s income and autonomy. Under managed care, insurers have decreased the fees paid to physicians. There are different ways how managed care organizations control costs. One of this is through selective contracting with health care providers and hospitals to lower costs. In selective contracting, health care providers agreed to accept lower prices in exchanged for guaranteed volume of patients under managed care plan (Culyer, 2014). This paper will discuss more issues and trends in Managed Care Organizations such as the rise of Medicaid Managed Care spending, the new Medicaid Managed care Rule, and the collaboration of Managed Care Organizations and Accountable Care Organizations to reduce health care spending and improve efficiency of care.

Therefore, one of the main ways the ACA seeks to reduce health care costs is by encouraging doctors, hospitals, and other healthcare providers to form networks that coordinate patient care and become eligible for bonuses when they deliver care more efficiently. As a CFO, I will recommend 10 Primary Care Physician and 15 Nurse Practitioners (NP) start our opportunity to participate in the ACO contracts with 10,000 ACO patients. Among the 10 physicians and 15 nurses each will see 5,000 patients with each patient seeing the physician 6 times per year making it 30,000

More often than not, physicians will respond to change in clinical practice with skepticism, despite research and clinical studies that prove a concept to be beneficial. The findings of Marjorie’s management team forecasted a 10-20 percent savings, which would definitely be supported by the accounting department. The alternatives that were discussed in Marjorie’s brainstorming sessions would all seem to be good ideas that would add value in order to satisfy Federal mandates. Tapping into the behavioral health expertise of all the participants in an ACO is one of the many reasons ACOs