preview

Example Of Rhetorical Hyperbole

Good Essays

What happens when one abuses their given basic constitutional rights to the extreme? When observing the recent actions of NGO giant Greenpeace, this question comes in as a determinant. The largest forestry enterprise, Resolute Forest Products is indicting Greenpeace of slanderous behaviour as well as the fabrication of photos, and falsifying evidence. In response to their lawsuit, Greenpeace states they did not lie but at the time they were engaging in “rhetorical hyperbole”. According to their words in a court gesture, their statements about forest destruction dealt by Resolute “can be describing figurative, rather than literal destruction.” In other words, they are utilizing the defence of free speech. This isn’t the first incident to occur from Greenpeace, as well as from other NGOs. What these NGOs don’t comprehend is whenever they apply the method of using “exaggerated facts” to reel in donations, it’s dealing a lot more damage than they realize. Consider the following, if the “rhetorical hyperbole” defence is valid; this spells out the legal precedent for years to come, creating massive negative impacts on company and people relations. Therefore, exaggerated truths used by NGOs should be made illegal.

Concerning the negative impacts that can stem from using exaggerated truths, misinformation can wrongly put a bad light on the company and the public. Before the lawsuit, Before the lawsuit, Greenpeace has been vigorously petitioning Resolute’s patrons to embargo its

Get Access