Examples Of Historical Inaccuracies In The Crucible

Integrity and honesty are virtues that are highly valued within the society we live in today. Society honors those that do the right thing and those that show integrity. Most of the population perform acts of righteousness in the hopes that they would be rewarded for their actions. However, there are some who still perform good deeds and maintain their integrity, knowing they would not be rewarded for their actions. In the play The Crucible by Arthur Miller, John Proctor is the most admirable character because he always does what is right, damaged his reputation to end the witch trials to save others, and stayed true to himself in the name of human dignity and justice even if it meant his death.

“Misrepresenting someone’s argument to make it easier to attack.” Is known as the Straw man fallacy. This fallacy has been used various times in the famous play by Arthur Miller “The Crucible” (1952). Below is an example of a Straw man fallacy, along with examples of from in “The Crucible” Arthur Miller (1952).

Arthur Miller, author of The Crucible, writes “For them that quail to bring men out of ignorance, as I have quailed, and as you quail now when you know in all your black hearts that this be fraud” (I. 1153- 1156). Miller illustrates that there is a difference between men belonging to ignorance from having no options and men not taking opportunities to gain knowledge. The town of Salem is caught committing sins in everyone’s daily life. This town is running on fear and quick decisions because the citizens do not understand the inevitable power of God. These people have claimed witchcraft by the devil has taken these people and it is their job to prevent this on anyone else. The town quickly accuses anyone that shows a questionable action of

Llogical fallacy is information that is sometimes not true. In The Crucible , they do have logical fallacies in the trials. Logical fallacies are always done on purpose, and it will always target stupidity. There are a variety of logical fallacies. The trial that involved Elizabeth Proctor is a logical fallacy because Abigail is making false statements claiming that Elizabeth is a witch based on the fact that Abigail was jealous.

Logical Fallacies in The Crucible Individuals can connect two varying events to form assumptions that they base solely on the order of events, known as a post hoc ergo propter hoc fallacy. Corey Giles states how his wife reading books certainly ties to his ability to pray: “and then she close her book and walks out of the house. And suddenly–mark this–I could pray again” (Miller 40). Miller shows how individuals can place blame on others with very little proof. This scene depicts how individuals can believe that events which occur sequentially do not necessarily have a connection.

In the Crucible written by Arthur Miller, he essentially talks about “courage, weakness, and truth.” Arthur Miller gives multiple scenarios when different characters have their time to shine and take the reader's attention. They’re multiple examples to prove this statement. For example would be when Thomas Putman stated, “he felt that his own name and the honor of his family had been smirched by the village, and he meant to right matters however he could.” In this specific quote he is very courageous to say something like this and take the law into his own hands.

Fear is the direct result of manipulation. In Act 3 of The Crucible, manipulation is employed many times in order to create an atmosphere of fear and often resulting in the byproduct of fear. During the trial of Abigail Williams, the issue of Proctor’s affair with Abigail arises; in order for Abigail to be defamed, Elizabeth needs to be honest; however, Judge Danforth utilizes tricky wording such as “has John Proctor ever committed the crime of lechery?” to create the feeling of it being John’s trial not Abigail’s(Miller 113). Danforth’s manipulation of how Elizabeth views the trials ends with the prosecution fearing for their lives and reputation. This created atmosphere of fear plays to Abigail's position giving her more power and persuasive

Arthur Miller, Pulitzer Prize winner and author of The Crucible, uses words to feel and convey the feelings created by characters and events in his novels. Witchcraft was the fulfilling lies of the courtroom authority, and separated the Puritan society. He enhances his message of overwhelming authority with such a plethora of literary devices such as hyperbole, irony, and fallacy to explain and demonstrate the abusing of power throughout The Crucible.

In the play The Crucible written by Arthur Miller there are prominent examples of doubt in the second act. Act 2 talks about a married man named John Proctor, who is rumored to have had intimate relations with Abigail Williams. Abigail is a young girl who still believes Proctor has feelings for her even after he denies their affair in hopes to save his reputation. In addition, Proctor is married to Elizabeth, who begins to question her husband’s relationship with Abigail. During Act 2, Elizabeth loses all faith that Proctor did not have an affair when he admitted he had been alone with Abigail for a moment. Elizabeth believes Proctor would testify against Abigail’s false accusations about the women of Salem being witches if he did not have

When a person comes across two alternatives, more often than not they believe they have to choose from the two. Arthur Miller utilizes the Fallacy of the false alternative to influence the decisions of each character. For example. Parris provides two alternatives to Proctor, "There is either obedience or the church will burn like Hell is burning, (30)" in order to defend himself. The confrontation between the two leads to distrust between the individuals. The others observers end up siding with Parris because of the reaction to the two choices Proctor expresses. It leaves them divided.

“The arrogant are wise in their own eyes, but the wise will recognize their lies” (Anonymous). This quote accurately describes how the events in the Salem Witch Trials unfolded. The Crucible, written by Arthur Miller, places the reader into the city of Salem, Massachusetts. Arthur Miller tells a fictional story based on real events of how people who were wise in their own eyes used others to better themselves in a community based on honesty. Three characters from the story stand apart in their arrogance. Abigail Williams, John Proctor, and Reverend Parris were conceited and cared only about their personal gains. These characters used their power to blame, but not to be blamed or accused of alleged witchcraft which resulted in the deaths of several townspeople. Arthur Miller used these characters to illustrate how simple lies and rumors can spread and become an unstoppable force. With these simple but powerful accusations, well respected citizens soon became the targets of these characters manipulation.

There are many themes in the play The Crucible, one of them is ignorance. The characteristics of ignorance are stubbornness, blindness, and lack of knowledge. Ignorance originates from the latin word ignorantem which means “not knowing.” Ignorance seems to be a universal thing. For instance, one can see ignorance in the government every time a political figure gives an empty promise, or when someone blindly believes a theory without having any actual evidence that it’s true, people who are unwilling to face reality are ignorant. Ignorance is a negative trait in a person because it is something someone shouldn’t be proud of having. Ignorance can be abused by many people, humanity abuses it when they are close-minded or stubborn. This theme will

Reverend Parris Logical Fallacies… NAH! In the play “The Crucible” written by Arthur Miller, the character Reverend Parris desires to secure his position as the minister, by showing the biggest logical fallacies which was limiting choices for the towns folk. Reverend Parris has been seen treating people badly and only caring about his well being. For him to limit someone's choices so he can get his way.

Many fallacies can be identified in the Crucible, hasty generalizations being one of them; conclusions based on too small of an example that later lead to hysteria of the public. One of these instances is such when Mr. and Mrs. Putnam arrive at Parris’s house and discover that Betty too seems to be acting strangely as their daughter, Ruth. When describing Ruth Mrs. Procter says, “She ails as she must-she never waked this morning, but her eyes open and she walks, and hears naught, sees naught, and cannot eat. Her soul is taken surely (1.13.5-7). Mrs. Putnam commits the fallacy of hasty generalizations here.

The Crucible is a play written in 1953 by Arthur Miller. It is based off of the 1662 Salem witch trials written as a parallel between this time period and the Red Scare, the time period in which he was living. There are many topics explored throughout the play, but the most important is hypocrisy, which can be seen in several characters.