The early 1920s were a prosperous time in American history. Industries were blooming and the economy was great. City growth was increasing and so was the new consumer culture. Women had finally earned the right to vote and the entertainment industry was flourishing. But it was also during that time that nativist emotions had reached their height. Native-born Americans believed that immigrants were stealing their jobs and wanted to protect their interests; the results were strong immigration laws and unfortunate trials like the one of Italian immigrants Sacco and Vanzetti. The United States had long been known as the land of opportunities. The American Dream was a known concept to the majority of the world, especially Europe. It was a common …show more content…
Americans wanted a return to normalcy after the war ended but the red scare brought anxiety and the appearance of American communists group. Immigrants were immediately targeted because of their foreign status and it gave nativists an extra reason to push more anti-immigration laws. The Ku Klux Kan also made its return during those years and gained more members than ever. They fought and discriminated against immigrants and Africans Americans throughout the countries. The attorney general Mitchell Palmer became obsessed with the idea of chasing after communists and other individuals who were against the country’s government. According to Howard Zinn, Palmer carried out a mass raid on aliens-immigrants who were not citizens at the time. He then provided transportation for those immigrants and deported them back to their homelands even though the Constitution gave no individual such a right (Chapter 14). As America’s distrust of immigrants grew, so did immigration restrictions and quotas were set to diminish the number if foreigners that entered the country every …show more content…
Ferdinando Nicola Sacco and Bartolomeo Vanzetti were Italian immigrants who even though gained American citizenship, were still wrongfully accused and sentenced to death for a crime they did not commit. Sacco who he lacked any formal education became a very skilled worker who earned high wages. He was a model of what American labor feared and, Vanzetti belonged more to the average immigrant who shifted from job to another. The case was one of the most controversial of the time. They did not receive a fair trial because of the anti-immigration beliefs of the time and the fact that they were anarchists. It lacked any hard evidence that tied them to the crime and their immigrant status along with their different political beliefs (they were anarchists) made them an easy target. The investigator failed to meet minimum requirements and no proper line-up was conducted. Instead, the two men were forced to stand alone in a room and pose as bandits (Library of Congress). In 1927, Judge Webster Thayer, who already believed that the defendants were guilty of the crime sentenced them die in the electric chair. His decisions sparked protests and collected petitions. Jams Wst Davidson stated that “the tides of nativism tend to rise and fall with the fortunes of the nation” (After the Fact, chapter 10). This means that during times of depression and economic struggles, nativism because a social disease because
The 1920’s marked a period of great racial tension throughout American Society, with the period often regarded as a melting pot due to such strains and tensions. The immigration of new, non-protestant immigrants such as Catholics and Jews since the turn of the century had brought about large scale unease due to the sheer number of immigrants. Combined with Mexicans, Orientals as well as a rapidly growing black population, these minority groups were to suffer at the hands of those concerned with the values of White, Anglo-Saxon Protestants, with these values playing a fundamental role in the American way of life.
All of this information lead investigators to believe the two were guilty of these crimes. their trial was long and was explained in the chapter to seem suspicious. Later we find out that the right to appeal failed and after six years of continuously bring new evidence to the case and even connecting another suspect to the crime they were not given a second chance in jail. The two men were killed November 18, 1925 by the electric chair for their ideas and beliefs and not proven guilty of such crimes they were accused
The 1920’s was a great and important decade for the United States. After World War I, the United States went through events and changes that, overall, made the United States a much better place to live. New advances in technology and industry improved American life in more ways than just one. Americans had better wages during this time, more leisure time, and overall, had a better life than ever before. In addition, the 1920’s advocated social and cultural change as well. During this time period, the United States did not return to Normalcy, and instead developed attitudes that changed the life of the people of the United States forever thanks to social changes, cultural changes and changes in technology.
By 1920, the Puritan legacy, the cant of nativist racists, the economic wars, World War One, the crime wave, and the Red Scare had conditioned the American people to fear and despise certain groups. These groups usually included eastern and southern Europeans. The arrest and trial of Nicola Sacco and Bartolomeo Vanzetti was fixated more on the battle between Anarchy and American traditions rather than the actual evidence the prosecution presented. The Red Scare played a massive part in this. The Sacco and Vanzetti case reflects the fears of immigration, immigrant crime and anarchy.
The 1920s were unlike past and future years. Before the First World War took place, the country remained culturally and psychologically rooted. According to The Glider Lehrman Institute of American History, “...in the 1920s, America seemed to break its wistful attachments to the recent past and usher in a more modern era.” That led to many different contradictions in the 1920s time period. A few of those contradictions were prosperity, the Klu Klux Klan, and nativism.
The great american melting pot of the industrial age was reaching its boiling point. Slums were overcrowded and the factory workers were just replaceable parts of a commercial machine that kept wages low and revenue high. Any uncooperative worker was replaceable at an even lower cost due to the heavy flow of migrants to the United States. These poor newcomers worked at any rate, which put many Americans out of jobs. The unemployed were angry and upset that they had been replaced by immigrant workers, and it became apparent in hate crimes, political parties such as the nativists, race riots, and police brutality. One day in Braintree, Massachusetts, two italian immigrants, Nicola Sacco and Bartolomeo Vanzetti, were arrested for an armed robbery of a shoe factory with two deaths (Kronenwetter). The two men claimed that they were innocent, yet the prosecution accused them relentlessly. Of the 33 eyewitnesses brought to the stand during the length of the trial, only seven people identified sacco, and four recognized Vanzetti. Every person that claimed to see sacco said he was wearing something different. The prosecution brought 16 men who thought they recognized sacco, but only 7 really did. They also brought 4 men that recognized Vanzetti, but they were very weak,
Americanism" or "Nativism," the belief that native-born Americans, especially if of Anglo-Saxon extraction, have superior rights to the "foreign-born," intensified during the "Red Scare" of 1919-1920. Nativist emotions were compounded by the association of immigrants with anarchists, Socialists and Communists, and figured prominently in the notorious 1920s trial of the foreign-born Nicola Sacco and Bartolomeo Vanzetti. In the 1920s especially, they were high restrictive of Southern and Eastern Europeans immigrating over to the United States. Immigrants were not only seen as undesirable to native-born Americans, but were also seen as stealing natives' jobs and threaten their "peaceful way of living." Nativists were also bothered by many
There were several conflicts that arose, but the three that had the most negative impacts upon the United States would have to be the effects of the Red Scare, the return of the KKK, and the increase of organized crime. In the midst of World War I, Russia and Germany signed a peace treaty known as the Treaty of Brest-Litovsk, in which Russia agreed to exit the Great War and deal with issues back home. Shortly after this occurred, Vladimir Lenin led the Bolshevik Revolution. This caused the Czar of Russia to be overthrown, in which Lenin became the new ruler of Russia and set up the very first communist regime. Communism was determined to be capitalism’s rival and abolish it within the world economy, sparking a wide spread panic among the United States known as the Red Scare. Americans were scared of communist spreading throughout the United States in the form of spies or invasion. This caused the government to take rash, unconstitutional actions towards non-natural born Americans throughout the nation, commencing the Palmer Raids and the quota system. The Palmer raids was General Mitchell Palmer’s counter to the Red Scare, in which he used police brutality to crack down on communists, socialists, and anarchists to protect the virtues of
Right at the peak of the “Roaring Twenties”, employment rates were rising; however, this evidently was a threat to native Americans who sought to compete for jobs with the mexican americans. Not only were mexicans constantly fighting to keep their jobs, but most were pretty much forced to change their culture to completely be “americanized”. “In 1921, a law was passed that limits the number of immigrants allowed to enter the United States during a single year are imposed for the first time in the country’s history”(Hispanic America V.I). This shows how “whites” felt threatened that Mexican Americans were coming in taking jobs, security, etc so the government eventually just limited the amount of immigrants who could come in. This
Benjamin Franklin once said “In short, unless the stream of their importation could be turned...they will soon so outnumber us, that all the advantages we have, will, in my opinion, be not able to preserve our language, and even our government will become more precarious.” Written in a letter in 1750 by our very own Founding Father Benjamin Franklin in regards to the high volume of migrating Germans into the colony of Pennsylvania. To many readers they could easily expect these words from nativist, but hearing it from one of the most influential people in history it conveys a lot about the shaping of the United States and where its roots of nativism started. Nativism is defined as 'a policy favoring native inhabitants as opposed to immigrants'.
He also named the four other men, Joe, Fred, Pasquale and Mike Morelli, who had taken part in the robbery. The Morelli brothers were well-known criminals who had carried out similar robberies in area of Massachusetts. However, the authorities refused to investigate the confession made by Madeiros. Many leading writers and artists became involved in a campaign to obtain a retrial. Although, Webster Thayer, the original judge, was officially criticised for his conduct at the trial, the authorities refused to overrule the decision to execute the men. By the summer of 1927 it became clear that Sacco and Bartolomeo Vanzetti would be executed. On 23rd August 1927, the day of execution, over 250,000 people took part in a silent demonstration in Boston. Soon after the executions, Eugene Lyons published his book, The Life and Death of Sacco and Vanzetti. Fifty years later, on 23rd August, 1977, Michael Dukakis, the Governor of Massachusetts, issued a proclamation, effectively absolving the two men of the crime.
Sacco and Vanzetti’s trial also garnered national attention through newspaper articles. Six years after their conviction, Sacco and Vanzetti gained international attention. Their defense lawyers also argued that the men were only convicted due to their anarchist beliefs and went on to contact Benito Mussolini who argued in defense of the men as well. Prejudice against anarchists was present during the time of this trial had a great impact on the outcome of the case and left a lasting impression of America. Another man ended up confessing to the murders, but Sacco and Vanzetti were continually denied a new trial. Just as in Frank’s trial, the defense for Sacco and Vanzetti applied for clemency but did not receive it. Furthermore, a judge was able to deny their appeals and eventually this rule was rewritten in Massachusetts so judges no longer have this power. The fear of communism and prejudice against immigrants played a major role in this case and impacts people’s lives
The 1920s, often referred to as the Roaring Twenties, was a time of great change and a time of powerful enthusiasm in many areas of society. The world had just finished the biggest war in history, the First World War, and the United States was left almost unharmed by the war. The United States was able to experience a decade of peace and success following the war. During this decade, America became the wealthiest country in the world (Trueman, 2000). The people in the United States went through a colorful period during the twenties. However, at the same time the 1920s was also a very rebellious and difficult time for many. The culture of the 1920s has influenced the culture of America’s society today.
The term “American dream” is relatively new and can stand for different connotations depending on the context. It was created by James Truslow Adams and written down in his book, The Epic of America, which was published in 1931. He states that the American dream is "that dream of a land in which life should be better and richer and fuller for everyone, with opportunity for each according to ability or achievement”(Adams). However, the basis for the foundation can be traced back to the sixteenth century Puritans. The Puritans did not call it the American dream, but their attitude towards religion and work ethic is similar to the term. They believed that for every single person there was a destiny. James Truslow Adams was a writer and stated that “dream of a land in which life should be better and richer and fuller for everyone, with opportunity for each according to ability or achievement”(Adams). America
When considering the outcome of the trial you have to take into account the historical context and the prevailing attitudes of society at the time.