This is what I refer to as “recreational negativism.” What is “recreational negativism”? This is the em-ployee who doesn’t just have a bad attitude, but enjoys complaining about everything because it provides them with attention. Hopefully, a supervi-sor can work with this employee to improve em-ployee performance, not only from a mechanical or logistical standpoint, but also from the attitude standpoint. The employee must understand there is no advantage to acting in this manner. The bottom line is, employees who embrace and practice “recreational negativism” may very well be employees that have given up on themselves. When I say “given up on themselves,” I mean the employee in question probably has determined that he or she may never be promoted or be seen as a team player. Therefore, they see their only course of action to gain some degree of notoriety, is to act in this manner. It is important to state that each employee …show more content…
These are not easy discussions. Some employees will utilize a variety of techniques to avoid corrective action or performance review documentation. They will utilize all of the approaches you would expect as defense me-chanisms. This will include indicating they are being reprimanded because they are not “a team player,” or because they think different than everyone else, or even because they are more forward thinking than everyone else. Supervisors should not be taken in by these defense mechanism approaches, which no doubt will surface (and probably not in the friendliest manner) during a performance review with the employee. These are simply attempts to avoid the real issue(s), which is that the employee needs to “straighten up and fly right” and present a good, or at the least acceptable, attitude each
Whoever knows me, they automatically know that I am a very positive and optimistic person. I go to Worland High School in Worland, Wyoming and I am a senior this year. Obviously, that means I have been going to school here for almost four years now. Let me tell you, there are so many positive students here at my high school. At my school, we have awesome negative people ranging from motivational dream crushers, the fantastic attitude and the vibe that they put off, and the excellent way they carry themselves everyday! If you were to ask me, negative and pessimistic people are the best kind of people to be around, they are handfuls of joy!
It takes some thought to distinguish the facts from your judgments, but the results are more meaningful to employees and more productive for you. Conversations based on evidence lead to employees owning the situation because they can focus on the evidence you have presented rather than your judgment” (Green, 2013). A good portion of the facts of the case study is based Kareem’s background information and the behaviors observed that caused the termination of Kareem. The information in between the reading and the reasonings given behind the termination results in it being judgment based. Although Thomas states that one of the key reasons that Kareem was terminated was due to his number declining subsequently of him being far from his work area, yet there is no solid evidence or pattern of behavior to back up his case. One of the first issues in this case was the lack of communication. As mentioned earlier, Thomas nor Janet took the time to provide feedback to Kareem (prior to the termination conversation) around his performance or the concerns that had been raised. It is imperative in a performance conversation, for there to be specific examples or data that can support the reasons behind the discussion taking
In addition, results should be disclosed to the employee, and rebuttals or modifications should be encouraged and accepted. I think the employee has a right to know how the evaluation is measured, scored, and who were the participants involved. The evaluation should mention past performance versus present performance, and what expectations the employer needs for the long term. The WorldatWork handbook for Compensation, Benefits & Total Rewards suggests using objective performance feedback
When you are conducting an evaluation of employees there is a slim chance it could be a good one or bad one for that employee. Most evaluations consist of identifying with wasted time, and how well the employee utilize their time with job responsibilities. The employee that has worked hard an efficient manner, and have worked, consistency beyond their call of duty would look forward to the evaluation. Perhaps the good employee understood their mission and work towards the goals of being competent in their position. Understanding and conquering the task of understanding what is expected of you in the job description. The fearful employee is very concerned about things that they failed to mention on the job application. Certain hidden agendas
Negative feedback is not easy focus on the behavior (activity) not the person. Be specific when explaining why the behavior is a problem. Express opinions as opinions not fact, anticipate reactions, and focus on the future. Remember in order for a feedback culture to work, employees must trust their leader, have a clear purpose, trust co-workers, take part in decision making, and feel safe.
The most ideal approach to challenge the prejudicial states of mind of a health care worker or an individual is to talk through their conduct with them and clarify that separation won't go on without serious consequences. This is not done in a forceful way, but rather in an approach to attempt to understand that individual to perceive that they are receiving a negative mentality – this must be clarified obviously additionally in a delicate and liberal way. It should be possible in the event that it's a social consideration laborer amid an evaluation as this permits individuals to scrutinize their conduct and roll out proper improvements or in a private meeting with an administration client that again permits them an opportunity to think – it
I recently encountered a situation where a manager was having conflict with an employee. The manager continually wanted to issue a warning to this particular employee and ultimately fire him. I had to stay as objective as I could and analyze the situation with fairness. I denied the issuance of an immediate warning until I had all of the facts. The manager implied that the employee was repeatedly having errors. In addition to the errors, he perpetuated a very negative attitude in the department. This employee was a loan collector and his main responsibility was to make collection calls after reading the notes on the accounts. I reviewed the number of calls he made on a daily basis compared to the other two collectors. I then asked the manager to provide me with the number of errors the other collectors made. In addition to comparing the two, I also had to analyze if the negative impact was having a serious detrimental effect on the department and weigh it against the effect of losing a collector would have on the other employees as well as our delinquency numbers.
Some people are very negative and instead of finding a positive end they always manage to make the
Counterproductive work behavior – Counterproductive work behavior occurs when an employees’ adverse behavior intentionally infringes on the best interest of the organization (Huangfu, Lv, Sheng, & Shi, 2017, p. 599-604).
When an employee is hired, the managers discuss the company policies and standards while setting expectations with the employee. The manager then spends a majority of their time teaching the employees how to work effectively. After training the employees, the managers put themselves in positions to observe the staff members so they are able to provide feedback. They make every effort to catch the good behaviors so they can provide recognition and boost the employee’s morale but they are also willing to provide developmental feedback when necessary. The manager informed me that this approach works for their company because it creates a fun and positive environment and the employees know they will always be treated fairly (Thomas, 2010).
McGregor’s Theory Y at Whole Foods plays the role in positivity. The text mentions that Whole Foods has the mindset that if the employees are happy then the customers are happy (Kreitner & Kinicki, 2013). Also, Whole Foods holds the idea of training as a very important of aspect of a well-rounded business. There is no part in Whole Foods that shows any signs of using McGregor’s Theory X. A majority of McGregor’s Theory X shows negativity in the employees and how they view their work. This also could be why Whole Foods has been so successful in their endeavors. One can even concur that the reason that Whole Foods is so successful is due to their CEO, John Mackey’s, philosophy of Conscious Capitalism (Cheretis & Mujitaba, 2014, pg. 4). Keeping
I have always kept close communication with HR, my supervisor, union stewards, and the workers to develop a plan to help them to improve and become very good workers. The two workers that did not achieve their goals, I had to continue with disciplinary actions. We provide to this worker many resources to help her improve their customer services and
Part A 1. My dog learned to stay in our yard and not run out in the road through the process of negative reinforcement. We had an electronic tool that would send out a sound that is unpleasant to dogs if he passed the perimeter of the restricted area. Upon returning within the perimeter of the yard, the noise stops. Because the noise being removed increased my dog’s behavior of remaining within our yard, this behavior was learned through negative reinforcement.
His need for control over circumstances in his family and work makes him have high emotion restriction, self-reliant, and competitive in the workplace. He refuses to show weakness by refusing to ask for help from others in the workplace. Although, he could have easily solved the problem if he had asked
There are many ways to be a non-conformist in today’s world. Most people think that a non-conformist is someone who has extreme views or does drastic things. A major example is in religion; the current “popular” religion is either Muslim or Atheism, or even no religion at all. Many people reject Christianity because it is considered “unpopular” and there might be bad connotations associated to that name to some people. Although doing something radical like this is the case sometimes, many things we do today are considered non-conformist. Becoming a vegetarian, driving a hybrid car, or owning a tiny house are still non-conformist ideas that many people practice.