Fraud Cases have Put Earnings Management back in the Spotlight

Early on, in the twenty-first century, several corporate accounting scandals led to the loss of billions of dollars worth for investors. Which also caused several bankruptcies for several corporations such as Enron, WorldCom, and Adelphia (Auerbach, 2010, pp. 1). Therefore, the United States Congress reformed corporation’s accounting practices that would hold executives accountable for accuracy of their company’s financial statements. This is the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, also known as the SOX Act or SarbOX Act.

Such an intense focus has been placed on quarterly earnings as an indication of a company’s success by everyone from analysts to executives that ethics have for the most part been thrown out the window, sacrificed to the all important number, i.e. earnings per share. This is the theory in Alex Berenson’s book “The Number: How the Drive for Quarterly Earnings Corrupted Wall Street and Corporate America.” This number has become part of a game to be played, a figure to be manipulated – beat the number and Wall Street all but throws a parade, miss it and a company’s stock may be abandoned. Take into account the incentives that executives have to beat the number and one can find plenty of reasons to manage earnings.

Prior to 2002, there was very little oversight of accounting procedures. Auditors were not always independent and corporate government procedures and disclosure provisions were inadequate. Sometimes, executive compensation was tied to the stock of the company which created an incentive to manipulate the stock price by using fraudulent accounting practices to make it look like companies were making more money than they actually were. The Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 was introduced because of the collapse of several major corporations due to these practices. This paper will

Following these series of failures, SOX was enacted to restore investor’s confidence which was rattled and to prevent accounting frauds in the future with improved corporate governance and accountability which all public companies must comply. SOX was named after Senator Paul Sarbanes and Representative Michael G. Oxley, who were the main drafters of the Act. It was approved by the House of Representatives and signed into law by the President George W. Bush on July 30, 2003. Lack of ethics and integrity seem to be the key factors that caused accounting fraud. SOX revised the framework for the public accounting and auditing profession, provided guidance for better corporate governance and created regulations to define how public companies are to comply with the law. Although many have questioned whether SOX is actually effective to prevent frauds like Enron and WorldCom in future, it is considered to be the most extensive legislation related to publicly- traded companies and external independent auditors since the 1930s. President Bush called it “the most far reaching reforms of American Business Practices since the time of Franklin Roosevelt” (BUMILLER, 2002). The purpose of this paper is to determine whether or not Sarbanes Oxley’s regulations will be effective in preventing another financial statement fraud like Enron and WorldCom.

The Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, also known as the SOX Act, is enacted on July 30, 2002 by Congress as a result of some major accounting frauds such as Enron and WorldCom. The main objective of this act is to recover the investors’ trust in the stock market, and to prevent and detect corporate accounting fraud. I will discuss the background of Sarbanes-Oxley Act, and why it became necessary in the first section of this paper. The second section will be the act’s regulations for the management, external auditors, and companies, mainly publicly-traded companies, and the cost and benefits of the act. The last section will be the discussion of the quality of financial reporting since SOX and the effectiveness of SOX provisions to prevent another financial statements fraud, such as Enron and WorldCom from occurring in the future.

This report is written as a response to the monograph in which the ICAEW published on how financial accounting disclosures can be improved. The aim of this report is to critically discuss and evaluate the worthwhileness of the recommendations made from a financial investor’s perspective. It is done by reviewing recommendations put forward by the ICAEW and analysing if each of the disclosure recommended is worth the effort while putting in perspective what effects these recommendations have on professional investors who are one of the primary users and consumers of financial statements. The report contains information mainly from the ICAEW report and the CFA institute report

According to Pompper (2014), “incidents of high-profile deception over the past” four decades “have threatened the reputation of the … accounting function” (p. 131). For instance, an investigation was conducted into the financial audit and reporting process after the savings and loan banking crisis in the 1980s (Pompper, 2014). In addition, the criminal convictions of executives and bankruptcies of Fortune 500 companies such as Enron and WorldCom in the turn of the century motivated Congress to pass the Sarbanes-Oxley Act (SOX) in 2002 to strengthen regulations within the accounting profession (Whittington & Pany, 2014). As a result, the SOX introduced provisions that changed the accounting function, such as the establishment of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (PCAOB) and other major elements; however, the SOX regulations subsequently resulted in consequences to its compliance.

Over the past decade the world has been taken by surprise by the numerous accounting scandals that have occurred, for example, Enron, WorldCom, Tyco, Xerox, and Global Crossing (Suyanto, 2009, p. 118). Since those accounting scandals occurred the United States Congress passed the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (SOX) to help improve a company’s corporate governance and help deter fraud (Chinniah, 2015, p.2). In addition to SOX, the Accounting Institute of Certified Public Accountants (AICPA) passed the Statement on Auditing Standards (SAS) No. 99 (p. 118). Both of these new accounting laws help to deter financial statement fraud from occurring.

Since Sarbanes-Oxley had been put into place to protect investors from possible fraudulent, accounting practices, which could be a misrepresentation of the company,’s actual Financials. The major firms, which lead to the development to Sarbanes-Oxley, is no longer in business. Some

In the early 2000s, accounting fraud was significantly shook investors’ confidence, the public scandals such as Enron and WorldCom hurts investor. Due to the great loss from accounting fraud and corporate failures, The Sarbanes Oxley Act was signed in 2002 to rebuild the confidence of public confidence. (Jahmani, Dowling 57)

Throughout the past several years major corporate scandals have rocked the economy and hurt investor confidence. The largest bankruptcies in history have resulted from greedy executives that “cook the books” to gain the numbers they want. These scandals typically involve complex methods for misusing or misdirecting funds, overstating revenues, understating expenses, overstating the value of assets or underreporting of liabilities, sometimes with the cooperation of officials in other corporations (Medura 1-3). In response to the increasing number of scandals the US government amended the Sarbanes Oxley act of 2002 to mitigate these problems. Sarbanes Oxley has extensive

Prior to the legislation of Sarbanes-Oxley Act, the regulations of financial statement were much more lax than current. There were only the rules declared by the SEC, the 1933 and 1934 securities laws (Carol, J., 2005). These laws required public companies to disclose the corporate information and have an independent party who reviewed and assured the company’s financial report. The public trusted the financial reports which were audited by the auditors and used in making investment decision. However, no one gave precedence to the accuracy and transparency of the financial information. Hence, many companies’ management took advantage of the lax reporting rules by manipulating the financial statement to make financial

The events of fraudulent and misstatement of financial data over the past decade or so have triggered an epidemic of financial concerns within the accounting community. These scandals have created a lot of economic turmoil, not only in the United States (U.S.), but also in other developed countries around the world. Since these events have arose, several agencies have been seeking various ways to help reduce future events of unethical behavior from continuing. After the WorldCom and Enron scandals at the turn of the century, the Sarbanes – Oxley Act of 2002 (SOX) was implemented in an attempt to mitigate the guidelines of financial reporting in the U.S. and entities operating abroad. Section

Nowadays, as our economy is facing possible everyday crises, managers undergo an increasing pressure in order to keep their company 's earnings stable. Shareholders and analysts expect companies to meet forecasted goals and not to deviate from these. Especially, reliable companies are to report positive results and shall not present any 'surprises '. Managers therefore often turn to their accounting departments for help, whose job it then is to improve the bottom line by changing the information shown in financial

An important function of the accounting field is to provide external users of financial statements with assurance that the financial information being presented is both reliable and accurate. This basic function of accounting is so important that there is an entire field of experts, called auditors, dedicated to assuring its proper performance. Throughout history there have been many instances in which the basic equilibrium between an institution and current/potential investor has been threatened due to a lack of accountability and trust between the two parties. This issue has been the catalyst for many discussions regarding the proper procedures a firm should follow in order to provide