preview

Fresh Fruit Broken Summary

Decent Essays

Fresh Fruit Broken Bodies embodies shifts in late 20th century anthropological theory through Holmes use of heavy participant observations, by critiquing the Medical Gaze, and by using Bourdieu’s theory on social violence. Holmes use of participant observations is indicative of the postmodern reflexive turn in anthropology where the insider perspective is more valued than it was before, and consideration of the positionality of the ethnographer. Holmes uses Lock and Scheper-Hughes' critical medical anthropology to critique the medical gaze as he seeks to uncover the hidden causes of the migrants health conditions. Bourdieu’s theory of social violence helps explain the conditions the migrant workers’ health as representative of the hegemonic …show more content…

citizen and also a medical doctor. Holmes attempts to address the asymmetry of power in the relationships with the Triqui people, by working in the fields as they did, living in the camps, traveling with them, staying in the same places as them,and even crossing the border with them. However, he still receives different treatment. In the fields he is not held to the same strict weight quotas, he is not treated disrespectfully, and even the other workers pick into his basket. Also, when the group gets arrested at the border they separate him and treat him differently. His positionality is inevitable as he is in a position of power relative to the Triqui even as he gives a voice to them. However this focus and attempt to account for his positionality is still indicative of the shift in reflexive writing on observing the everyday activities and …show more content…

First were legal issues associated with his intended deep participant observation method that included actually illegally crossing the border with the Triqui people. In relation to this, was his inability to help the Triqui in ways that his positionality might otherwise afford him because once again of the legal ramifications involved. He also had to be carefull attention to where he received funding from, since accepting money from federal sources might compromise the safety and well-being of the very people he is studying. Ultimately Holmes grappled the most with the question of is it worth it? Public Anthropology’s stance is to engage in social and audiences beyond self-imposed disciplinary boundaries. Homes does this by engaging in a social issue of the time and writes his book in such a way that people from outside the medical field and even outside the anthropological field can understand it. Public Anthropology also seeks to “start conversations among concerned parties.” Holmes does this through his deep participant observations and heavy focus on the experience of the actual people the ethnographer studies. Public Anthropology starts these conversations because they “can lead...to significant change.” In the last chapter Holmes calls for the attention of medical practitioners, policy makers, employers, and anthropologists to pay attention so that

Get Access