From The Aeneid Analysis

In examining the histories presented by Livy and Tacitus, it is crucial to take into account the agendas of the respective authors. While both set out to portray as accurate of a historical representation as possible, it is evident that both renowned historians and rhetoricians intended to deliver several significant messages regarding their thoughts on Rome. Both authors do, indeed, acknowledge the greatness of Rome and champion the core of Roman values; however, Livy and Tacitus tactfully elaborate on different troubles that face the Roman Empire. The histories put forth by these great men aim to present the past as an aid to promote

While the ending of The Aeneid might be seen to have multiple significances, I believe that Virgil ended the poem the way he did to make a statement about the use of power to achieve dominance and rulership: namely, that a lust for nothing but power will ultimately consume. The poem ends with Turnus and Aeneas facing each other one-on-one on the battlefield. However, it should be noted that there are fundamental differences between the philosophies of the two combatants which should first be grasped to fully understand the significance of Aeneas’s actions in ending the war. Before the battle between Aeneas and Turnus begins, the reader gets a glimpse of Turnus’s philosophy regarding the stakes of the battle. “Either I’ll send, with my hand, this deserter of Asia, this Dardan, / Down to the Pit of the Damned—and the Latins can sit down and watch while / My lone sword is refuting the charge of dishonor we all share; / Or you [Latinus] must share my defeat. And Lavinia must go as this man’s wife.” (12.14-17) Turnus believes that in war, there is no possible outcome but for one leader and his entire army to be wiped out in the other side’s pursuit of honor and glory. Aeneas’s views on the battle are displayed earlier in the poem, when he journeys down into the underworld and is instructed in Trojan battle philosophy by his deceased father Anchises. “You, who are Roman, recall how to govern mankind with your power. / That will be your special ‘Arts’: the enforcement of peace as

The Aeneid, the famous epic poem written by Virgil, depicts the struggle of establishing an empire. The beginning of The Aeneid introduces Aeneas, son of the goddess Venus, whose fate is to find a new home in Italy after the fall of Troy. Throughout the perilous journey, Aeneas faces great obstacles as he strives to fulfill his prophecy and gradually transform into the ideal Virgilian hero. To emphasize his growth, I will discuss three themes in this essay: the extent of free will as it relates to fate, the influence of divine beings on mortals, and the principles of morality. All of these ideas serve as an understanding as to why Aeneas is unable to act on his own accord. This leads me to defend the view that humans require the positive guidance of a mentor figure to resist their self-indulgence.

In this essay I will summarize Julia Hejduk's argument that she lays out in her article, “Jupiter’s Aeneid: Fama and Imperium”. This essay will summarize the argument Hejduk makes in her work, catalogue her evidentiary archive including the secondary and primary sources she utilizes, as well as describe the fit between her argument and the evidence she employs, and discuss her disciplinary identity, including her training, previous works and how she fits into her discourse community. I am doing this to connect what the author asserts about Virgil's Jupiter to what this means in terms of Virgil's opinions on Augustus and the Roman Empire.

The art of rhetoric comes in many different ways, practices, and ideals, but was ultimately started by the Ancient Greeks and adopted by the later Romans. Robert W. Cape Jr. not only explores the connection between the two, but also analyzes Cicero, an ancient Roman, and his ideology that suggested orators being the best qualified to write and present history correctly, both singularly and through the use of rhetoric. The article Cape published, “Persuasive History: Roman Rhetoric and Historiography”, analyzes Cicero’s main argument of entrusting orators with history’s “immortality” through his interpreted citations, Latin semantics, his affinity to his own intellectual means, and a nonexistent chorus.

With this narrative and spirit of historical conundrums in mind, we will examine two primary Ancient Roman sources. The first will be Augustus’s Res Gestae Divi Augusti and the second, Book Ten

For decades humanity has fought an ongoing war between emotional and logical reasoning. Some tend to trust by nature, and convince themselves to make the impossible possible, no matter how bleak the situation may seem. However, there is a point when this optimism turns to lunaty. Others think more rationally, making cogent discussions over all desire. But are these “rational choices” more important than sentiments of the heart? Perhaps the best representation of these differentiating mind sets is in Virgil's The Aeneid “Book IV” and “ Book II”. Queen Dido's character represents heart over head, while Aeneas represents head over heart . I believe that virgil uses Queen Dido and Aeneas to represent how each of these attitudes can negatively or positively affect the outcome of a situation, and are ultimately equal.

The epic poem The Aeneid, by Vergil adapts scenes, similes, and characters from the Odyssey written by Homer. The works of both authors include the simile of Artemis/Diana. Other characters do overlap in some of Vergil's scenes for instance, Aeneas and Odysseus encounter Cyclops. Both authors also reference the scene of the underworld. Although, Virgil adapts similarities from Homer's epic, each encounter has noticeable comparisons and/or differences. Vergil presents the epic of the Aeneid with a different purpose. At the beginning of the Aeneid, Aeneas leaves his home with other Romans after the Trojan War. Homer starts his epic with Odysseus wanting to return home form Troy.  The motives that guide each character differ from one another. Homers the Odyssey is more of the journey of a man longing to be home again, after the trojan war has ended. His actions are somewhat selfish at times. Virgil's main character Aeneas is driven by more of a scene of duty to the gods, because he is instructed to help build Rome for future generations.

The novella Pankration explores hope and bravery of a young Athenian boy, captured and sold into slavery. Blacklock’s Pankration follows protagonist Nicasylus on his journey to Olympia as he witnesses the Pankration, building friendships along the way. Nicasylus and Pankratiast Gellius demonstrate that Blacklock borrows some of the themes from the classic poetic texts, The Iliad, The Odyssey and The Aeneid but also creates her own themes that are consistent throughout the text. Pankration stands out from other texts due to it following a young boy but also at the same time a pankrationist in his struggle to save Nicasylus from slavery. Pankration shares various themes with The Illiad as well as creating unique themes to the text that cannot be found in The Illiad.

Vergil and Mark are the respective authors of the The Aeneid and The Gospel of Mark. Both share the theme of what defines a good leader. At first glance the differences between Aeneas and Jesus are evident. Aeneas is portrayed as a cunning warrior who uses these traits to lead. Mark on the other hand takes a different approach and does not portray Jesus as a warrior leader, but a leader who relies on preaching the word of god. However these differences are only superficial and many similarities can be pulled between the two characters. A similarity they share is they do not conform to past models of leadership. Mark and Vergil also share the same goal; they are both writing to create legitimacy.

The protagonist of the Aeneid and known hero to many, Aeneas, was a man of many virtues. His courage and obedience towards the Roman gods are clearly shown all throughout the book, as well as his passion for justice. When he leaves his lover, Dido, at the bidding of the gods, he shows obedience even when it went against his own will. The time Aeneas travels into the underworld to find his deceased father, it shows great bravery. It is even seen by the example of the crew of Aeneas that he was an incredible person, judging by how loyal they were to him. But, even with all these wonderful attributes, Aeneas wasn’t the entirely heroic person we believe him to be.

Intro – Begin by talking about how people often see Aeneid by Virgil as focusing on the events surrounding the Trojan war, but an equally important part of the story is the prevalent theme of duty. For instance, if one looks at Aeneas one can see his devotion towards caring for his people, and his persistence to follow his duty. Because of the emphasize that Virgil places on Aeneas devotion to his people and his duty to obey the gods, one can begin to theorize that Virgil believed duty was the most important quality a man could possess. Thesis: Often times, the Aeneid carries the reputation as a book centering around the founding of Rome, however, without the constant reminder of duty, one cannot fully view Virgil’s story as he intended.

Throughout the Aeneid, one of the consistent themes that is rampant throughout the book is the theme of pain and suffering. In each crevice of the epic poem, there are always mentions of the horrors and emotions that the characters have to go through. However, this theme of suffering throughout the book allows that characters to appear more human to the reader as it is not filled with unrealistic happiness, which allows the audience to empathise with the characters as they go through problems which are relatable. By having the theme of pain and suffering being a major part of the Aeneid's plot, with mention of Book XI in particular, we are able to relate the suffering Aeneas and other characters in this book have with our own suffering, which allows us to look at the characters in order to get a sense of what we can do to overcome pain and suffering when faced with adversity,

In ancient poetry, gods were people too; early epic was history but a history adorned by myth. This fantastical, mythical element came via the gods, envisaged as anthropomorphic deities. In Virgil’s Aeneid these gods function in epic as literary vehicles and as characters no less detailed and individual than the people in the poem. In this world where the mortal and the supernatural not only coexist but interweave with one another, the Aeneid follows the mortal Trojans as their world moves from war to peace and as they attempt, often unsuccessfully, to overcome the supernatural obstacles put in their path.

The Aeneid of Vergil is Latin epic poem in twelve books by an ancient Roman poet, Vergil. This poem is designed to celebrate the origin and growth of The Roman Empire, the achievements both of Rome and of Augustus. To describe of main character briefly, Aeneas, the Trojan hero, who survived the fall of Troy and after long journey founded a settlement for Trojan in Latium in Italy. The Aeneid consist of abundant references to history of Rome and the political issues of his lifetime. This paper explain explicit and implicit that Roman history and politics are explored in the Aeneid, points from the book that political matter and events from Vergil’s era and earlier Roman history integrated, how Aeneas’ conflicts with some countries recall critical events in later Rome, and points that Aeneid conveys with its evocative representations of Roman history and politics.