preview

Gender Norms In Jane Eyre And Atonement

Decent Essays

Whilst McEwan demonstrates how women are victims of society in that they are unable to achieve a high social position and class without the aid of men, Bronte focuses on how women reach a position of power through their own source of status and wealth. Emily, Cecilia and Briony all represent a society dependent on men to achieve wealth and status, as they all become members of the upper class through the wealth and inheritance of Jack Tallis. Emily’s ineffectiveness and lack of status and authority is emphasised by the contrast between her and her husband, as despite her husband’s absence from the family, he still has more control over the children than she does. With Jack’s presence, the household is described as ‘settled around a fixed point’, however without him it is ‘a drama …show more content…

This shown through Rochester explaining how he was betrothed to marry Bertha in order to secure a ‘wealthy marriage’. Ideas about class and gender are also juxtaposed in Jane Eyre and Atonement as Emily is presented as a victim through asserting traditional assumptions about gender, societal roles and class, whilst Jane and Bertha challenge these roles and appear victorious by seeking a better societal position through education and challenging the norms of female submission and the oppression of passion. Emily’s traditional thoughts are shown through her attitudes to Cecilia, as she views her daughter’s degree at Cambridge as unsatisfactory and argues that Cecilia ‘had no job or skill and still had a husband to find and motherhood to confront’. Whilst Emily discourages Cecilia going to university, Bronte contends that women should create their own wealth and status through the characterisation of Jane, who throughout the novel actively tries to seek justice and equality through pursuing education and expanding her knowledge through

Get Access