preview

General Sherman's Fight To Win The Civil War

Decent Essays

When we look at war we think of awfulness and cruelness and everything else that is a synonym of terrible. Well Sherman did exactly what gives war the bad name, but also to many people he done what he had to accomplish to give the Union Army the victory. Remember that the Union Army obtain fighting for a good reason to fight and Sherman helped made that happen. This war action remain one of the most critiqued in history. Was it necessary or not? Examination of General Sherman illustrates to us that with destroying anything valuable to the South and help giving the Union Army the victory over the whole war, he is a hero to the North and a evil man to the South. Which side is correct? Civil War documents illustrate that the Union Army needs …show more content…

In the book Merchant of Terror: General Sherman and Total War the author John Bennett Walters mentions a quote from General Sherman, “ you cannot qualify war in harsher terms than I will. War is cruelty and you cannot refine it,” the people who caused this war deserve all the punishment they can get (133). The south divided themselves from the north causing the civil war, they started it, so they shall aquire punishment for it, but when is the punishment too much. Then Wheeler provides evidence about how the 60,000 men that Sherman possess left marks on the southern territory which includes burning towns and barns, kill their animals and possible torture to the enemy (64). After Sherman left a town in Atlanta, observers said the ground held home to many trees because of the union’s axe, and also the woods and fields were home of dead bodies of animals (61). Sherman gave the orders to his soldiers which allowed his men to forage, it was Special Field Orders NO. 120 (62). This allowed his men to enter any private property looking for food. Wheeler also writes while Sherman’s men looked for food and opened up barns it is said that any livestock they found was killed (110). In her article “Reconstruction: Photography And History In E.L. Doctorow’s The March,” Laura Barrett sometimes portrays Sherman as a ruthless person by mentioning that “Sherman talks about what he executed in the south, he says that the south needed his soldiers to give them a warring imprint to give the south value (63). He implying that the South asked for this punishment with the decisions they made. Barrett surely is right about how Sherman’s men absolutely left a mark on the south because as she may not be aware, recent studies from Richard Wheeler shown that the plantation owners in the south whoever lived in the march’s route gathered their stock and hid them, confederate cavalry revised the owners when

Get Access