Know you're future now. A new trend in science today. Genetic testing, is a world of benefits for individuals who are selected for this test. Knowing that he could have possibly offspring with birth defects or serious health problems among the main reasons why choose individuals that these genetic tests done. Not when it comes to genetic testing on pregnant women and there is a small controversy. Parents should do genetic testing or not. one perfect example is the Cell-Free Fetal DNA Test.
This test is usually done around 10 weeks from a blood draw. From this simple non-invasive blood draw doctors are now able to search for a range of different diseases such as Down syndrome or Edwards syndrome. It can also check for sex chromosome disease
…show more content…
Typically the father's role in this situation would be to go along with the mother but Tony does have the right and is invited to have some hesitation. We don't ken what type of testing they're going to do and we do not ken the side effects it will have on your unborn child. Not to mention the integrated cost factor in doing certain type of genetic testing. Some of them are not covered through indemnification mean and may curve a hectic cost. One must additionally take into consideration their religious backgrounds and credences that may be playing a factor in Tony's hesitation. One way or another this decision should not be made at the medicos office but me at home after conscientious consideration weighing the pros and cons and verbalizing with family members. Why do the testing if there's no desideratum to do the testing do we have the mazuma to cover the cost and if something should transpire in the mist of the test are we going to resent each other when one was not okay with the decision to go with the testing in the first place. All of these things need to be taken into consideration and verbalize about exhaustively, afore making any decision that can affect the health and salubrity of your incipient
In Improvements in Prenatal Genetic Testing Raise Ethnic Issues, R. J. Crayton produced an article about prenatal testing and whether or not parents should be allowed to have these tests done. First the situation of a high risk baby who will have a disability or defect after birth, so the parents decide to abort the child is being viewed as an inequality to the disabled community. Secondly, certain adoptions are put on hold since the biological parents chose to not carry the unborn child through the entire pregnancy, however, the surrogate mother wants to carry the child through the entire term. Lastly, research shows that the results can be a false positive, so unintentionally the parents decide not to keep the unknown, but healthy baby.
While there are several aspects which a couple needs to think about upon receiving information of the test results, one basic principle surrounds the entire decision. What will we do with our fetus? One of the most common options for
The Human Genome Project is the largest scientific endeavor undertaken since the Manhattan Project, and, as with the Manhattan Project, the completion of the Human Genome Project has brought to surface many moral and ethical issues concerning the use of the knowledge gained from the project. Although genetic tests for certain diseases have been available for 15 years (Ridley, 1999), the completion of the Human Genome Project will certainly lead to an exponential increase in the number of genetic tests available. Therefore, before genetic testing becomes a routine part of a visit to a doctor's office, the two main questions at the heart of the controversy surrounding genetic testing must be
The information found is supported by evidence and is the same we use in our practice. The problem is that insurance companies will pay for standard screening with Nuchal Translucency, but they will not pay for cell-free DNA testing unless the standard screening comes back high risk, the patient is advanced maternal age, or has a history of a previous birth affected by aneuploidy. Cell-free DNA testing includes X Y analysis, so the patient is able to find out the sex of the baby around 10 weeks. This is becoming a popular request just to find out the gender. Insurance companies have now caught on to this trend, and are refusing to pay for the X Y analysis of the cell-free DNA test, which does include specific abnormalities associated with X Y abnormalities. Medicaid will cover the standard screening, but will not pay for cell free DNA testing. We have 3 patients at high risk and have done prior authorizations through Medicaid, they still refuse to cover. One being a patient who tested high risk for trisomy 21 on her standard screening, one who is advanced maternal age, and one who had a previous pregnancy with a child with Down
Many medical advances are being made today in the area of genetics. One of the most talked about is prenatal genetic testing. The purpose of prenatal genetic testing is to obtain information on a baby's health before they are born. This new technology will definitely improve the quality of human life. Diseases will be diminished and through new advances some diseases might even be eliminated. Children will be at less risk to have major health problems in their lives adding positively to their life experience. Prenatal genetic testing will also affects society as a whole.
Genetic testing has become a highly controversial issue among both the general population and the scientific community. It is a process that exposes a person’s entire genome sequence, allowing it to be read and evaluated to identify potential risks for genetic diseases or diseases that could be passed onto offspring (Holt Productions, 2012). With thousands of genetic tests already being used, and more being established, it seems logical to put this growing technology to use. Some agree that it is a person’s right to know and understand his or her genetic makeup. However, others argue that, despite the benefits of genetic testing, caution should be used to carefully inspect the risks associated with this new technology.
“When families get a diagnosis prenatally, they use the words ‘shock’, ‘sadness’, ‘disbelief’”, says Sarah Cullen of the Massachusetts Down Syndrome Congress. “ You feel like like the rug is pulled out from under you. You feel very heavy. You feel very, very alone” (Szabo 1). When parents receive the results of their prenatal test, many do not know what to do. They can feel very overwhelmed, because their baby is unhealthy and there may be nothing that they can do about it. Often the doctor does not know what to do either, because there may not be a cure for the disease.This kind of news alone is agonizing for parents. Mothers should not have genetic testing done to see if their baby has diseases because it causes unnecessary anxiety for the parents, tests may not always be accurate, and it is unethical.
1st trimester non-invasive genetic testing: Here at MWH all of our patients, regardless of age or risk factors, are offered cell-free fetal DNA testing during their initial prenatal visit (around 10 weeks). Cell-free DNA is the most advanced way to detect early fetal abnormalities through genetic material that is released by the placenta and into the maternal blood circulation. The results are very accurate, the test is non-invasive (blood draw for mom), and if you choose, you can also learn the sex of the baby by the end of the first trimester! Best yet, most insurance will cover the full cost of our
Breakthroughs in genetics have allowed parents to test their babies DNA in the womb for potential genetic diseases and disorders. The test is done by isolating the babies’ genetic material that is coursing through their mothers veins through a blood test on the mother. After the genetic material is found it is put under multiple diagnostics to determine if the baby has any of a wide variety of conditions such as Down’s syndrome, Tay-Sachs and cystic fibrosis. This Prenatal Genetic Screening can also tell many different traits on the developing baby such as its gender. Many believe that this procedure to be unethical but genetic screening can do more good than harm.
The debate for parents to be able to choose or have it be mandatory for babies to have their genes scanned for future health issues is a pointless yet valid debate. There are so many debates over this certain topic because people feel as if they need to know what their child might have in the future so it can be "fixed" by treating it early. It is a valid debate because it could help save lives and suffering. People say it should be added to the other 30 mandatory tests every new born should have to do.
Here is a real life story of a woman who has been greatly affected by genetic testing and has seen both the good and the bad of genetic testing. This is a story that was posted in an article called “6 Moms Share Their Real Prenatal Testing Stories” on the website “What to Expect” from Courtney from Lake Stevens, Washington about how genetic testing has affected her life. So for Courtney, a few weeks after her 13 week ultrasound and her quad screen her doctors told her she had a positive screen for Down syndrome. So at 17 weeks she had to go back in for another ultrasound and genetic counseling which according to kids health.org is counseling that allows a genetic counselor to evaluate the results of a genetic test with the parents and helps the parents understand and reach decisions on what to do next. Her ultrasound looked great but still had a positive screen for Down syndrome. So she was was recommended for either an amnio or verifi test. Courtney then went to genetic counseling and choose to have the verifi test done over the amnio. A week later her results came back negative for Down syndrome and confirmed the baby was a girl. Courtney said “I am glad we opted to get the verifi test done especially after the stress of getting a positive screening before. I like how that if the NIPT did turn out positive for Down syndrome, I could have prepared ahead of time for the care of a special needs child would require, rather than feeling completely caught off-guard at birth.”
Although genetic testing can benefit society in numerous ways, such as the diagnosis of vulnerabilities to inherited diseases and ancestry verification, it also has the precarious capability to become a tool in selecting a more favorable genetic makeup of an individuals and ultimately cloning humans. Genetic testing will depreciate our quality of life and may result in discrimination, invasion of privacy, and harmful gene therapy.
Deciding whether or not you want to know more about your genetic makeup is a very personal decision that may seem like an easy one, but it’s not. As direct-to-consumer genetic testing is growing as an industry, it is becoming easier and cheaper for people to learn unique personal things about themselves, like ancestry composition, food preferences, and physical features. However, these tests can also inform people of genetic predispositions to diseases. Although some people believe that knowing all of this genetic information can be dangerous, monitored DNC tests can be very informative and beneficial.
The Goal of the Human Genome Project is to obtain genetic mapping information and to determine the complete sequence of all human DNA by the year of 2005. The project started in 1990 and 180 million dollars are being spent on it annually. This adds up to a total of over 2 billion dollars for the 15 year budget. Of this 2 billion dollars budgeted, 5% is spent annually on the ethical, legal and social issues. This report focused on some of these issues.
Loss of privacy, psychological disorders and testing errors are risks of genetic testing. However, certain genetic testing methods, such as carrier screening and preimplantatioin diagnostic testing can help parents prevent potential diseases their child may get. I would say it shoule not be implemented in healthcare today. At first, I found on the Internet that the cost of genetic testing can range from under $100 to more than $2000. As I tend to stereotype these types of advanced technology as expensive and hard to implement, I am wondering if the under $100 testing can get any effective results. Thus, people from higher socioeconomic status are more likely to be benefited from genetic testing, not lower SES people. Secondly, gene carriers