Genetic Testing Persuasive Essay

Though there are many arguments against having a DNA database there are also reasons to have a DNA database. DNA is one of the leading factors in putting criminals behind bars. When DNA is evident in a criminal case, it makes that case a lot stronger. With a database of all citizens DNA it can help law enforcement catch criminals to make communities safer. DNA will not only be able to help solve crimes ongoing now and for the future but to help solve past crimes. DNA also allows for scientist to use the valuable information for research to get a better understanding of health and safety for individuals and to help link people who have the same medical condition. With an entire database of all people, it allows for the system to not be discriminatory. Minorities make up the vast majority of the criminal justice system. With every race, gender and ethnicity in the system it opens up the ability for all people to be at risk for being in the system with DNA placing them for a crime and making it harder to get away with one. There is also a possibility that having a DNA database will lower crime rates. People who feel they can get away with crimes now, will have a higher chance of getting caught. Those who fear getting caught because the government and police agencies have their DNA will be less likely to commit crimes. Mark Kleiman a professor who deals with criminal justice stated, “DNA databases reduce crime rates,

   The Human Genome Project is the largest scientific endeavor undertaken since the Manhattan Project, and, as with the Manhattan Project, the completion of the Human Genome Project has brought to surface many moral and ethical issues concerning the use of the knowledge gained from the project. Although genetic tests for certain diseases have been available for 15 years (Ridley, 1999), the completion of the Human Genome Project will certainly lead to an exponential increase in the number of genetic tests available. Therefore, before genetic testing becomes a routine part of a visit to a doctor's office, the two main questions at the heart of the controversy surrounding genetic testing must be

Many medical advances are being made today in the area of genetics. One of the most talked about is prenatal genetic testing. The purpose of prenatal genetic testing is to obtain information on a baby's health before they are born. This new technology will definitely improve the quality of human life. Diseases will be diminished and through new advances some diseases might even be eliminated. Children will be at less risk to have major health problems in their lives adding positively to their life experience. Prenatal genetic testing will also affects society as a whole.

Currently, it would be a violation of our constitutional rights if the government collected DNA from every U.S. citizen (Iyengar, 2014). In 2013, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled in Maryland v. King that the government may obtain a DNA sample of a person arrested for a serious offense (Iyengar, 2014). Should the government be granted the right to collect everyone’s DNA and build a database to contain every sample? I can understand why the government would want this; however, I believe there would be security issues, and too many opportunities for abuse.

It has been estimated that about 200,000 murders have not been solved since 1960, leaving criminals on the loose. The numerous amounts of murder have left family and friends to mourn the loss of their loved ones with unanswered questions ("Open Cases…"). Who, when, and why are various questions that do not get answered when a murder is not solved. According to National Public Radio, if one is murdered in America, then there is a one in third chance of having the murder identified ("Open Cases…"). Indeed, having these criminals on the loose is very alarming and more criminals need to be captured. The United States of America authorities need to focus more on solving the cases than letting the cases go cold. a

Deciding whether or not you want to know more about your genetic makeup is a very personal decision that may seem like an easy one, but it’s not. As direct-to-consumer genetic testing is growing as an industry, it is becoming easier and cheaper for people to learn unique personal things about themselves, like ancestry composition, food preferences, and physical features. However, these tests can also inform people of genetic predispositions to diseases. Although some people believe that knowing all of this genetic information can be dangerous, monitored DNC tests can be very informative and beneficial.

If you were able to pick what characteristics your child is going to have, would you? From the color of their hair, to maybe even their sexuality. Is it okay to alter the characteristics of your child based on your own opinion of who you want them to be? What about the question of a baby being required to have a genetic screening before or right after birth? Should that be allowed to happen with the fact of the parents, or anyone for that matter, not knowing who is going to have access to these records? In a scientific manner, this seems like it is not that big of a deal. Thinking about this ethically is the what everyone is concerned about. I do not think that this is ethically okay. Where do we draw the line?

If I could I would receive genetic testing to better inform myself if I was a carrier for this gene. I would want to know because regardless of how discouraged I may feel, being prepared for the future of my family is important to me. I would want to know so that this way I could plan and make any arrangements necessary to help my family out.

Ever heard of Genetic Testing? It’s a branch of Genetic Science (Genetic Science is pretty much characterizing the etiology of illness.) that involves testing the Genome to find mutations that cause disease or will cause disease, an example of this being the BRCA1 and BRCA2 genes, these genes can get a massive variety of genetic mutations that cause cancer. ("Genetic Testing for Cancer: A Complex Decision.") All in all it’s a slowly building advancement in science that’s slowly increasing to a field of massive size. “You know, every week, there’s a new company, there’s a new test, there’s a new competitor.” ("Will Sequencing Your Genes Change The Way You Live ? And Die?.") However it has a lot of controversy and quite a few ethical issues that come along with it, an example being the fact that people that already have defects tend to dislike these tests.(Middleton) However if human lives could be saved or even made better because of this, then why shouldn’t it be allowed to progress? Genetic Testing is definitely a good thing and the field should be allowed to advance. It could save thousands upon thousands of lives. The benefits that come from Genetic Testing far outweigh the risks that come with it.

The controversy surrounding the issue is that DNA databases can be used to track individuals who have not committed a crime. Some people argue this invades their privacy. Certified people can go through and view anybody’s DNA profile.

Have You ever thought about genes,Tell me what it is You don’t know well here is a quote "Eugenics is the study of the agencies under social control that may improve or impair the racial qualities of future generations either physically or mentally."

Unfortunately, genetic testing tends towards being inaccurate with specific empirical data missing, and the common tool for its analysis appears to be nothing more than fictionalized scenarios, accompanied by varying interpretations and applications of test results. (B-232) The more common ancestry tests rely on short stretches of DNA in mitochondria, the cell-powering organelles. These mitochondria are inherited through the mother, or on the Y chromosome which is passed down from father to son. Mitochondria and Y chromosomes developed specific changes to them as people migrated around and across the world, and tied them to different populations, but charting an unbroken line along ‘uniparental markers’ (the paternal or maternal line) is

Huntington disease is an inherited disease that affects the brain which results in affected individuals to pass away before the age of 50. As of today, there is no cure. Genetic testing is used to identify genes associated with various inherited diseases. Many people argue that they wouldn’t get tested due to financial issues, stress, or discrimination, but after discussing ethics in genetic testing, I strongly believe that it is best to get tested.

My opinion is that the genetic testing for the BRCA1 and BRCA2 shouldn’t be taken by teenagers. I think this because logically the genetic testing isn’t stating directly how it can pinpoint a problem. The genetic test won’t state what cancer you are in risk of. The genetic test will only tell you if you have BRCA1 and BRCA2 gene mutations, which are good to know but aren’t worth the risk of the genetic testing. I believe as teenagers we aren’t in the state of mind to make a life changing decision on whether we should take the genetic test or not. Legally considering we can’t make many decisions as a teenager anyway, why should we be allowed to decide if this is a test we want to participate in? I simply believe if it is

One of the biggest reasons for why DNA databases should be allowed is because it would shrink the number of innocent people getting convicted of crimes. For example, When DNA evidence is found at a crime scene, the government will be able