preview

Gertrude Talks Back Analysis

Decent Essays

Atwood’s short story in particular Gertrude Talks Back, focuses on the infamous closet scene in Hamlet in which Gertrude is responding to the scene. This is presented in a light-hearted, slightly mocking way, whereas Shakespeare’s play is haughty and serious. Atwood’s story allows more depth to be brought to the character of Gertrude through the use of her thoughts and feelings towards Hamlet and other matters in the play. In Shakespeare’s play, the main focus is directed upon Hamlet and his struggle to come to terms with his mother’s incestuous affair.

In passage 65 - Act 3. Scene 4, Hamlet discusses his father’s importance and physical appearance and in return, contrasts Claudius’ appearance, referring to him as a “mildewed ear” and the …show more content…

For instance, In Gertrude Talks Back, Gertrude narrates the short story in modern day tongue, such as “know what I mean?”. Atwood’s use of modern language lets the reader know that the story is going to be playful and non-reverential to Shakespeare’s original play.
Another difference is the context/setting. In Shakespeare’s original play, Hamlet, the conversation being unfolded is between the two of the characters (Gertrude and Hamlet) is happening ‘in person’, whereas in Atwood’s story, it seems as though Gertrude is writing a letter or perhaps an email to Hamlet (the possibility is there since it is written in a modern way).
In Shakespeare’s play, the audience is inclined to feel an uneasiness about Gertrude because of her lack of modesty when it comes to Claudius, however in Gertrude Talks Back the reader begins to grasp a slightly better understanding of the character or Gertrude because of the rawness of this text.
Claudius is presented very differently in both passages. In Atwood’s story, he is not presented as the villain of the story who happens to “like(s) a drink every now and then”, but in Shakespeare’s play, Claudius is considered as a “mildewed ear” and/or a

Get Access