preview

Gilgamesh Human Flaws

Better Essays

For as long as humans have had the cognitive ability to consider human nature, it has been recognized to include many characteristics which most cultures generally regard as flaws. Attributes such as pride, selfishness, enviousness, entitlement, and aloofness are just some of the human traits to which people have given bad connotations over time. Humans who display these characteristics are usually looked down upon and encouraged to attempt to suppress or overcome them. This is a common scenario in literature as well. Characters clearly exhibiting “bad” traits are often punished in some form, whether it be by other humans, gods, creatures, or simply fate itself. The morals of the stories seem apparent: these traits are not acceptable and anyone …show more content…

The hulking protagonist of this ancient epic, Gilgamesh, is described as the king of Uruk who is “two-thirds divine and one-third human” (Mitchell 71). However, despite his divinity, Gilgamesh exhibits unfavorable human traits in his kingship such as hubris and, resulting from that, cruelty. Some individuals may argue that we, as readers of the text, cannot know whether these characteristics are a result of Gilgamesh’s divine part of self or his human part of self. However, this argument is irrelevant in this context due to the fact that these attributes are typical of humans and may therefore be accepted as human characteristics for the sake of discussion, whether or not divine beings also experience them. Gilgamesh exhibits cruelty in the tyrannical manner in which he governs his people of Uruk. He “does whatever he wants, takes the son from his father and crushes him, takes the girl from her mother and uses her, the warrior’s daughter, the young man’s bride, he uses her, no one dares to oppose him” (72), exemplifying Gilgamesh’s cruel nature and utter lack of compassion. This cruelty is a result of Gilgamesh’s hubris; his self-confidence is so great that he freely carries out his own will, never considering the consequences for others. He also believes himself to be undefeatable in battle, as …show more content…

In Gilgamesh’s battle against Enkidu, the two make a connection that changes Gilgamesh for the better. The two once-rivals “became true friends” (90). This is the first time Gilgamesh has someone in his life for who he truly cares. Suddenly, compassion and love for Enkidu allow Gilgamesh to open his heart to another and thereby become somewhat less egotistic. However, Gilgamesh’s hubris still gives him a desire to fight and defeat Humbaba, a fight which leads to Enkidu’s death. If Gilgamesh was not so hubristic as to want to “stamp [his] fame on men’s minds forever” (94) by winning in battle against Humbaba, Enkidu would have lived. His death ravages Gilgamesh, who sets his sights on achieving immortality so that he may never experience the very human fate to which his soulmate fell victim. Gilgamesh devotes years of his life to seeking immortality, but his quest ends in vain. The damage that Gilgamesh’s hubris caused is apparent; he experienced awful heartbreak and sacrificed many years of his mortal life in an attempt to preserve it. However, Gilgamesh’s story ends with an interesting conclusion: instead of suffering for the rest of his days due to his tragic flaw, Gilgamesh is able to accept that “[t]here is no way to overcome death” (63) and

Get Access