To be as good as one can be without the fear of having to face death is what Socrates strongly wants Athenians to do. “You are wrong,sir, if you think that a man who is any good at all should take into account the risk of life or death… whether he is acting like a good or a bad man.” (Apology, 28B). What Socrates is trying to say to the Athenians is that a good man should only focus on his actions, to make sure that what he is doing is the right and not wrong, and whether what he is doing will make him a better person. It is not about what everyone else wants us to do and follow but to live a good and moral life. That if a person examines whether what he is doing is right death should not even cross his mind. If someone is being put on trial or tried to death he should not be ashamed or embarrassed and the reason for that is because he is following what he believes is right and not wrong. Socrates mentions in his “Apology” that if someone were ever to ask him if he felt ashamed of living the life that he was living and he was being put to trial and tried for death for it he would say that he is wrong for having asked such a question like that. Wrong because if he is living and knows he is living a pious life then there is nothing to be ashamed of, he is living the way that the gods want him and everyone else to live and that is by having self knowledge. It would then be wrong if one started living a life of falseness and wickedness by doing things that would get him to avoid death. Socrates also talks about how a good man should never assume he knows something when in reality he does not. “I differ from the majority of men… I do know, however, that it is wicked and shameful to do wrong. To disobey one’s superior, be he god or man. I shall never fear or avoid things of which I do not know, whether they may not be good rather than things that I know to be bad.” (Apology, 29B-C). Socrates mentions that if there is one thing that he differs from everyone else is that he acknowledges that he does not know about the underworld and there is no reason to fear. Whereas, Athenians claim that it is the greatest of all evils and they would do anything to avoid it. What Socrates then has that the Athenians do not have is
Socrates believed his integrity was more important to him. He was not going to give up his beliefs to please others. Socrates defends himself, saying the most important thing is “not to avoid death, but to avoid unrighteousness” (168). He told the jury if “[they] think by killing men” they can “prevent someone” (182) from thinking for themselves, they are wrong. Socrates spoke his mind, knowing that what he said in that moment could affect whether he was sentenced to death or not.
“the hour of departure has arrived, and we go our ways – I to die, and
Through several dialogues Plato gives readers accounts of Socrates’ interactions with other Athenians. While some may think of him as a teacher of sorts, Socrates is adamant in rejecting any such claim (Plato, Apology 33a-b). He insists that he is not a teacher because he is not transferring any knowledge from himself to others, but rather assisting those he interacts with in reaching the truth. This assistance is the reason Socrates walks around Athens, engaging in conversation with anyone that he can convince to converse with him. An assertion he makes at his trial in Plato’s Apology is at the center of what drives Socrates in his abnormal ways, “the unexamined life is not worth living for a human being” (38a). Socrates, through aporia, looks to lead an examined life to perfect his soul and live as the best person he can be. This paper looks to examine the ‘unexamined life’ and the implications rooted in living a life like Socrates’.
Socrates was being guided by his moral beliefs when he decided not to escape from prison. Socrates informs us of his principle when he says, “[…] my first principle, that neither injury
2. During his main speech, to explain why he chose to live the life he did at risk of being “in danger of death” 28b, Socrates uses an example from the Iliad in which a young man chose to avenge his friend's death at the risk of immediate destruction as opposed to surviving. 28D paraphrased. This example of a life of integrity allows Socrates to demonstrate that all men should “remain and face danger, without a thought for death or anything else, rather than disgrace.” 28e. It is in this same moment that Socrates explains that were he not to live the life he has lived that he would be disobeying a god.
Socrates should not escape from prison to avoid his death sentence because he would be breaking the law which ultimately led to him straying away from his own principles. He was a person who believed in what was just and doing what was morally correct. If he were to escape from prison, he would essentially be harming others and the State. He thought through harming others, he would be harming himself and his soul, so Socrates did not believe in harming others and thought it was unjust and morally wrong. Even though Socrates had the opportunity to escape and he was given plenty of reasons from his friends to do so, he did not want to go against what he believes in and his philosophy. He could not live a life where he would have to stop
Socrates’s offering to the jury is to tell the truth, despite not admitting that it is simply his truth and thus not the entire truth, he is not able to convey to the jury the importance of not killing him. A bad citizen would try to undermine the jury by committing perjury and disobeying the decision of the court. He however, wouldn’t even like it if the jury committed perjury on his behalf, “Socrates says what he means on the stand hold honesty above all else, so when he is offered a chance to escape from his execution he does not take it. By refusing to escape, he reiterates how sticking to agreements is important to him. Socrates' commitment to the societal agreement between him and the city where he is allowed to live in
The problem with Socrates concerns the problem with the role of value and reason. Nietzsche believes that the bulk of philosophers claim that life is a corrupt grievance for mankind. Nietzsche reasoned that these life deniers were decadents of Hellenism, as a symptom of some underlying melancholy. For someone to paint life in such a negative light they must have suffered a great deal through the course of their own life. Furthermore, these no-sayers agreed in various physiological ways and thus adopted the same pessimistic attitudes towards life. Socrates was ugly, alike decadent criminals and by ways of these similarities was decadent as well. Nietzsche also claims ugliness as a physiological symptom of life in its decline supported by studies in phenology.
He knows that when he is put to death, they will be the ones at a loss of his knowledge and true wisdom. He still believes he has gained no reasons to think that he can lose in death as his acts were not for material gain (28-29). Socrates has shown no fear for being hated by the majority of Athens, yet still finds himself being accused of serious crimes leading to his death.
There are times in every mans life where our actions and beliefs collide—these collisions are known as contradictions. There are endless instances in which we are so determined to make a point that we resort to using absurd overstatements, demeaning language, and false accusations in our arguments. This tendency to contradict ourselves often questions our character and morals. Similarly, in The Trial of Socrates (Plato’s Apology), Meletus’ fallacies in reason and his eventual mistake of contradicting himself will clear the accusations placed on Socrates. In this paper, I will argue that Socrates is not guilty of corrupting the youth with the idea of not believing in the Gods but of teaching the youth to think for
Some people would argue that it is necessary to pursue good life at the expense of your own life because of the expected lack of peace of mind, which would be equal to death in the event that they would give false accounts of events, in the hope of escaping punishment as expected by law. It is natural for modest people to offer their apologies for the wrongs committed. However, when most of us set out to seek forgiveness, we do so in the hope that the repercussions of our actions will be lessened. In Socrates’ case, it was expected that after seeking forgiveness, the jury would lessen his sentence, and perhaps send him to prison without the need to execute
Even in the face of death Socrates portrayed these values. Socrates treated his own trial with contempt despite the punishment of being put to death. Furthermore, he declined the proposition to stop his ways of examination with the reward of his life. Firstly, he did not accept the plea because he was willing to consider the fact that death may indeed be better than life, again admitting his own ignorance (Apology,516). However, his reason for not accepting the plea was that he believed “a life without enquiry is not worth living” (Apology, 526). Socrates understood that in order to live the good life for himself it could not be done without examination and rational thought.
Along with reason, another one of Socrates’ essential beliefs was that once virtue was learned, an intentionally unvirtuous thing could never be done. During the course of his exchange with Crito, Socrates says, “We are never intentionally to do wrong… injustice is always an evil and dishonor to him who acts unjustly”. Socrates whole-heartily believed that, once virtue was learned, no man could ever do wrong intentionally. However, had Socrates abandoned Athens, that would have been exactly what he would have done. Looking back on Socrates’ teachings, future scholars would have been hesitant to believe that Socrates actually believed what he was teaching because he was not will to die for what he believed to be right. Socrates, being a virtuous
Socrates spent his time questioning people about things like virtue, justice, piety and truth. The people Socrates questioned are the people that condemned him to death. Socrates was sentenced to death because people did not like him and they wanted to shut him up for good. There was not any real evidence against Socrates to prove the accusations against him. Socrates was condemned for three major reasons: he told important people exactly what he thought of them, he questioned ideas that had long been the norm, the youth copied his style of questioning for fun, making Athenians think Socrates was teaching the youth to be rebellious. But these reasons were not the charges against him, he was charged with being an atheist and
Socrates was considered by many to be the wisest man in ancient Greece. While he was eventually condemned for his wisdom, his spoken words are still listened to and followed today. When, during his trial, Socrates stated that, “the unexamined life is not worth living” (Plato 45), people began to question his theory. They began to wonder what Socrates meant with his statement, why he would feel that a life would not be worth living. To them, life was above all else, and choosing to give up life would be out of the picture. They did not understand how one would choose not to live life just because he would be unable to examine it.