Government Monitoring Research Paper

I believe that the government should have the powers to monitor internet content but that people should be aware that it is occurring. If the government is aware of some sort of threat in which they will need to monitor the internet in order to help neutralize the threat. But, in a situation where this is happening, they should

The United States is not surveillance society, but the government’s ability to collect data and “spy” on its people has reached an all time high in the digital age. Americans must continue to discuss and debate the government’s ability and limits in monitoring its citizens in the modern day. ()

Some would say the government does not need a warrant to search personal, already shared things on the internet. However, the government needs a search warrant to search personal, already shared things on the internet because, the American people have constitutional rights and privacy rights their government has granted them. The First Amendment grants Americans the right to freedom of speech, online or on paper. This shows we should not be worried that we will be punished about what we say because we are granted the right to speak freely. Furthermore, the Fourth Amendment grants Americans the right to be protected against unreasonable searches. This amendment proves that the government needs search warrants to search or look at other people's things.

The Internet powers our country. Not only do hundreds of millions of Americans use it daily, our government and states use it to do important national and international business. Our government already utilizes it to monitor the activity of its people. This monitoring has especially risen after events such as the Boston Bombing and the attacks of 9/11. The main reason that the government does this is to keep us safe. If the government puts more slack on this matter, then it will give a chance for terrorists to complete their objective. The normal person does not know how many terrorist attacks may have been stopped in the past years due to this surveillance, and how many lives it may have saved. Therefore, we cannot let our government halt

Most people do not want a 9/11 repeat and will say, the NSA should be allowed to monitor everything we do on the internet to protect our families and loved ones. The NSA is here to protect us and doesn’t care about the stupid videos you watch for laughter, they don’t care about the pictures you took when you were on vacation. The “spying” the NSA does keeps track of phone calls, emails, messages, purchases and your location. The people opposing monitoring our internet behavior say, monitoring everything we do and saving our data, is breaking the Fourth Amendment right which is,

To what extent in the U.S. does the government–federal, state, and local–have the duty to monitor internet content? This is a question that many U.S citizens don't know the answer to. Everyday, people around the country search up anything they want without censorship. If you were warned that the government can see everything you search, would you browse what you usually do ever again?

" The founding fathers created the government to unite, and protect The United States. The government must also be able to protect citizens basic rights. These rights are written as amendments to our constitution. Our government has a duty to protect United States citizens, and with new technology this need for protection has extended to the internet. Federal, state, and local governments have a duty to protect their people, and to do this minimal forms of internet monitoring are needed.

The constitution was created to provide the people with their rights. The amendment that protects one’s privacy, the fourth, is just like the right of free speech and the right to bear arms. It should be equally respected, not infringed upon. The 4th amendment isn’t the only idea that protects our rights. Unlawful surveillance is also a key to breaking article I, section 9, clause 2 of the Constitution: “The privilege of the writ of habeas corpus shall not be suspended, unless when in cases of rebellion or invasion the public safety may require it.” The NSA’s illegal surveillance is unabashedly insulting to our

"The extent that the government-federal, state and local have to monitor internet content would be a simple overview to make sure that everyone is alright and there is no alarming content that could be used to hurt others. Only an overview would be necessary to make sure that there are no obvious threats to anyone and if there are any suspected threats to anyone, there should always be a probable cause before any form of the government gets deeply involved into someones internet content because after all everyone should be entitled to privacy unless there is a specific reason that their privacy should be breached then the United States government should be allowed to view their content without restriction to keep people safe. The National Security Agency which is a national security agency that has intelligence over the country that is in the department of defense in the US and is directed by the Director of National

The United States Government deserves the right to monitor American’s internet searches to ensure national security and prevent an attack in a very hostile world. In any case, at the first thought of the government monitoring American’s search history, people find it very incongruous. This is only, most importantly, for the safety of the American people. Many Americans often assume that what the NSA, National Security Agency, is doing is illegal; it’s not. Under the Patriot Act, the government is allowed to use tools that are previously developed that help prevent the drug trade and organized crime. Former Vice president Joe biden once talked about how you can get a wiretap on the maffia, but not one on a terrorist to prevent another 9/11 (“The

Without this governmental monitoring comes censorship. Schools already face the backlash of this as seen in the article by Melinda Anderson on The Atlantic. Students lose some of their rights as they enter school decided by the case TLO vs New Jersey, and so the school has the right to censor their internet usage. The school’s ability to block certain websites and various tools are based on the idea that they have to “block material that is obscene, child pornography, or harmful to minors”. But this definition gets construed, websites that were just supporting an opposing view as the school officials such as LGBT support groups get censored. An internet without government interference and monitoring is an un-american internet, censored and

Many Americans inquire this question concerning their privacy: is government-monitored internet usage constitutional? Is it okay for the U.S. government to view American citizens' email, social media, and internet activity in order to prevent bullying, crimes, and terrorism? These are burning questions that many Americans ask in this digital age. Several Americans wonder if this act of surveillance may become an invasion of privacy and to what extent the government may use these surveillance technologies. Many innocent Americans believe that this viewing of internet usage is breaking the Fourth Amendment of the Bill of Rights, which states that citizens have principal constitutional protection against government spying. If the government begins to view citizens' internet activity, is it a violation of every American's Fourth Amendment rights?

"Does the United States government have the rightful duty to monitor internet content? There are multiple opinions on what rights people have towards the freedom of being online. What is constitutional? What is not? The principles from the constitution and current events show evidence towards the controversial topic of the United States Government having rights to monitor internet content. Two constitutional principles that support this is limited government, and checks and balances. The two current events that support the idea that the government should have the duty to monitor internet content are the Russia Facebook election, and the NSA spy speculations.

The US government upgraded their use of network surveillance in order to maintain social control, however; it seems that they are taking away something in return from the internet users by doing so. There has been conflicting opinions about the impact of

I believe that the US government has a responsibility to monitor internet content that is in the public domain in order to keep the inhabitants of the United States safe in multiple ways. First of all, if a group is organizing a terrorist attack on the nation, and the government has no idea it is coming, it will be nearly impossible to stop. If, on the other hand, even a small piece of information can be gained by monitoring online content, the attack could conceivably be stopped or at least have the damage mitigated. Secondly, some content that can be found on the internet, such as pornography, can cause serious mental health problems to those who view it. The US government has a responsibility to its people to do all it can to prevent that, because those effects on a person, can, in turn, cause them to inflict harm on another. Third,