Gun Control Is A Top Reason For Owning Guns

Gun control is a very controversial topic that has has a huge impact on the United States of America. One side believes that if guns were taken away as a whole, the country would see significantly less gun related crimes and death, while the other opposing side thinks that taking away guns is not only against the Second Amendment but would lead to an increase in crime and death because the government would take guns away from people who are legally registered to own and conceal guns. The ongoing debate will continue until the foreseeable future but their are plenty of reasons why more gun laws should be made. Taking away guns is not the answer, learning how to deal with gun violence is the key.

Guns, Guns, Guns. In today’s news Gun Control, has become a controversial topic. I have heard many people say that, “Guns don’t kill people, people kill people”. So, do we need gun control? People talk because they have mouths, they don’t know the extent about gun violence. About half of the country’s population is for / against gun control. Consistently, the media outlets are reporting shootings, that is accidental or intentional whichever way it is trending across the United States. Stronger gun control laws, mains fewer suicides. Also, stronger gun control laws, needed to protect women from domestic abusers and stalkers. Such a variety of individuals say that stricter gun control legislation is an assault on the second amendment. As we all know, the second amendment protects everyone who has a firearm. Many people should be able to protect themselves from local criminals or vicious attacks indeed, but some individuals abuse their rights. To some people gun control is an issue, and to others it is not an issue. I strongly believe in adding more laws to the gun control policy that it will reduce the crime rate. I stand strongly with being able to carry around a firearm, but stricter gun control laws should be implemented. Reasons being, if stricter laws are being put into place, we as an society can have safer communities and not have any fear for our lives as we walk down the streets.

Coming from a family that owns guns, the topic of gun ownership has become more pertinent than ever. From a young age, my grandfather instructed me on the proper care and usage of firearms. However, due to a death within the family years ago due to gun violence, the repercussions of the Second Amendment have become more palpable. Approximately 73% of the 16,459 homicides could have been avoided in 2016 solely if guns didn't exist, and 11,961 lives potentially saved according to data calculated from the Federal Bureau of Investigation dataset. Whether or not the people of the United States agree with more gun control, the choice of allowing guns to the public puts everyone at a potential risk of encountering a firearm related crime. The glaring need for improved gun control within the U.S. became apparent in the recent

In America guns have been a part of the country’s society since it’s birth. Throughout history the citizens of the US have used firearms to protect the nation, protect their families, to hunt for food and to engage in sporting activities. The issue of Guns and gun control takes on a proportion of extreme magnitude. Weighing the rights and liberties of the individual against the welfare and safety of the public has always been a precarious balancing act. In the United States, gun control is one of these tumultuous issues that has both sides firmly entrenched in their positions. Those parties in favor of gun ownership and the freedom to use and keep arms, rely on the fact that the provision for such rights is enshrined in their constitution.

Most homicides in the United States are committed with firearms. Approximately 270 firearms are owned by Americans scales to about 90 guns for every 100 people. Annually, the misuse of these firearms cost thousands of lives. Stricter gun control is a step into putting a halt to mass shootings. Not only should gun control keep being enacted, but the process to obtaining a gun should be stricter because it would be an immense effort to keep gun violence down and effectively save more lives.

Over the past year, the topic of gun control has received more and more attention. In America, gun control is a very serious issue. The reason why people feel that gun ownership is such a big problem is because there have been more tragic shootings in recent years. Moreover, many people lose their lives by them each year. Conservatives will say that guns are used for protection, and more guns will equal less crime. In the other hand, others will say guns should not be owned by anyone. It should only use by the police or law enforcement because more guns will equal more violence. I believe America does not want any more mass shootings, so it should be a gun control. Even though some people believe it is a right to carry firearms but it should be outlawed because it is too easy for criminals to get handguns and too many innocent people are dying from accidental shootings.

In the wake of numerous mass shootings within the United States, the highly controversial topic of gun control arises as a necessary discussion. Ever since the 18th century, Americans have been allowed the right to bear arms according to the second amendment. Along with the other amendments in the bill of rights, it was formulated in order to benefit the American society. That, of course, raises the question, has the allowance of the carrying guns been a positive or a negative in the US? If the answer to that question was based on the plethora of mass shootings we’ve observed in the recent years, the answer would have been that it’s results has been negative. However, most topics as debatable as these never have such a simple answer. A few avenues we could look at are, what are the pros and cons of gun control, if the second amendment has been favorable in America, who does it benefit, and if guns were banned, what would be the possible outcomes?

Recently there has been a renewed debate about whether or not gun control could be a legitimate way to reduce the violence in the United States. Like any debate there are two sides: one for gun control and one against it. Recently, the pro gun control side has argued that the recent mass shootings and general violence is a result of our country’s minimal gun control. And although this may seem like a reasonable argument, in reality it is an overgeneralization; there are many other factors that lead into horrific events like mass shootings. On the other side, those who want gun freedoms have argued that gun control laws are a violation of citizen’s constitutional rights. But when the facts are looked into more it is clear that generalized gun control is not a good solution because guns do not kill people, people kill people.

There has been much controversy over gun control. The posing question is: will gun control help our country and should it be allowed? Some people believe that more laws and restrictions on the purchase of guns would help our country stay safer. Others claim that gun ownership is a constitutional right and that restricting access to guns violates this right. The debate about gun control should not be taken lightly, for the lives of the American public are at stake. Gun control is not the answer. Our nation needs to closely look at what motivates individuals to use guns for killing, and find methods to solve the underlying problem. This will ultimately keep the people of the United States safe.

Mass-shootings — defined by the FBI as four or more murders occurring during the same calamity, with no distinctive time period between the homicides (Serial Murder) — have stricken across the United States at the rate of about one every two weeks since 2006 (Database of Mass Shootings, 2006-2013). This abysmal statistic has rightfully triggered much debate concerning gun restraints. The theory of gun control pertains towards any efforts intended to regulate, define, or limit the possession, production, sales, and use of guns. Since its conception, the Second Amendment — guaranteeing the “right to bear arms” — has been wildly controversial. Gun control advocates suggest that confining gun ownership would reduce the number of violent gun-related crimes, suicides, and deaths; rigorous background checks and mandatory waiting periods would help to deter criminals and possible tragedies; and that assault weapons and large-capacity ammunition magazines should be banned from public use, as police officers and military personnel are the only officials who actually need them. Adversaries argue that criminals will always find a way to get their guns, consequently leaving law-abiding citizens defenseless; crimes are often prevented by the prophylactic effect of the possibility of victim gun possession; and that the Second Amendment to the Constitution protects individuals’ right to gun ownership. Gun control is a considerable system that galvanizes Americans apropos several quandaries; therefore is it vital to be conscious of the pure facts associated with gun restriction, and even more crucial to comprehend the advantages and disadvantages.

The debate over gun control is often perceived to be to control reduce crime. The politicians use it as fodder for the emotional voter. Regardless of your view on gun control guns will be a fact of life in American. The US contains roughly 270 million of the world’s estimated 875 million privately owned guns (McInnis, 2007). All agree we must find away

This article offers numerous amount of convincing counter arguments as to why arguments against gun control are wrong. Moreover, the article offers the advice of experts regarding gun control specifically why people are the problem and

One of the leading political issues in America is whether or not there should be stricter gun control. Gun control is a set of laws that places more restrictions on purchasing firearms. Some restrictions are background checks, ban public gun carry, psychological testing, and gun training. A political issue poll from ISideWith showed 51% of 32,306,814 voters said there shouldn't be regulations on purchasing a gun. The majority strongly believe and agree with the Second Amendment, “A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.” Americans have the right to own and purchase a firearm. Even with that being stated, it is still no question that gun violence is the dominant cause of mass killings in America. There have been over fifty mass shootings in the United States since Columbine, and over one thousand innocent lives murdered as a result. The latest shooting was on Monday, April 13th at North Park Elementary School, where 3 people died. This sparks the point of view of the minority population, to sharpen our gun control laws.

gun control is one of the most controversial topics of today. both sides, for or against it, have their reasons as to why they believe in what they do. gun control is such a major topic that many families disagree, resulting in major conflict. either way, gun control is an important and necessary step we must take in order to improve the society we live in today because the united states has the highest mass shooting rates, there would be less gun-related deaths, and guns are dangerous especially if every person owns multiple weapons.

Reason one for gun control is that the united states has more gun ownership than any other modern country in the world and along with that has the highest rate of gun violence. How many people do you know that have a gun? Do you really think they should have one? They probably tell you it is for protection, but odds are they would rarely need to use a gun to protect themselves. Usually the gun is what caused the problem. More people pull a gun when not necessary and that leads to the big problem. Many problems could be solved by not using a weapon. “The more people carry weapons, the more likely it is that an everyday dispute can escalate to lethal force. Social scientists say there is little reliable data one way or another(PÉREZ-PEÑA, RICHARD.)