We are all taught from a young age the difference between right and wrong. We are taught that following the law is right, and breaking it is wrong. As we get older, however, we learn that not all laws are just ones. While a government in a free society will typically do its best to protect its citizens, there are times in which it allows laws to be passed that do not allow all of the nation’s citizens to prosper. Civil disobedience is at times a necessary action in correcting unjust government behaviors, and ensuring freedom and equality for all people within a society. Henry David Thoreau popularized the theory of “civil disobedience” in the mid-1800s. The two principles he supported under civil disobedience is first, that the authority of the government depends on the consent of the governed, and second, …show more content…
Nonviolent protests, among other peaceful forms of advocating for one’s beliefs, is a time-tested method of fixing corrupt laws of a government within a free society, and encouraging equity for all citizens. The most respected and influential civil rights leaders over the past two centuries have practiced peaceful resistance. In addition to those listed previously, other notable practitioners of civil disobedience include, but are not limited to, Rosa Parks, Muhammad Ali, and Edward Snowden. What each of these individuals have in common is their intellect, in knowing the existing conditions of the State and/or society are immoral, their sense of justice, in knowing something must be done to correct these moral wrongs, and their bravery, to take the initiative to be the one who will go about rectifying such injustices. The impact these people had on their societies is undeniably constructive, as their actions eventually led to the improvement of treatment of oppressed individuals within their communities, and as their legacies continue to be told and inspire new young activists to this
From the start of man fighting for freedom or his beliefs, the question has consistently been whether a person can wage a battle using words rather than actions. The notion of civil disobedience would seem to be an inept weapon against political inequity; history, however, has persistently proven it to be the most dynamic weapon of the individual. By refusing to pay his taxes and subsequently being imprisoned, Henry David Thoreau demonstrated this very defiance. Thoreau’s Resistance to Civil Government conveys the effectiveness of the individual conscience, renounces hypocrisy, and cultivates a sense of urgency where inaction creates a moral conflict. This path of responsibility paved by Thoreau gave our leaders of today the means they
In Henry David Thoreau’s Civil Disobedience, he is writing to the American people. He is trying to spark a desire for change, for people to oppose their government without actions. He uses this work to criticize the American institution of slavery as well as the Mexican-American War. Thoreau is attempting to convey the importance of listening to one’s conscience over the laws, believing that it is more important to do what they feel is right rather than listen to the laws given by the majority. Thoreau feels that people should protest against their government, but not using violent actions. He is trying to persuade the people to voice their opinions and break the chain of majority rule. Thoreau is writing during the time of the war between the United States and Mexico, which took place between 1846 and 1848. He writes to oppose the government’s actions and policies during this time period. He refused to pay a tax that would support the war and was imprisoned for a day. Thoreau uses ethos, logos, and pathos to persuade his audience to agree with his view of the American government and to voice their oppositions.
The Statue of Liberty is an American symbol of justice and freedom from oppression, yet in Henry Thoreau's opinion, the U.S. government is completely antithetical. In Thoreau’s essay on civil disobedience, he introduces and accepts the motto, “That government is best which governs not at all.” In his eyes, the government does more harm than good for its people. Underneath his seemingly main idea, Thoreau implies an overall antithesis where he defines who, in his eyes, is allowed to be disobedient. In order to advance this main idea and reinforce this mottos throughout the essay, Thoreau uses metaphors and juxtaposition to strengthen this subtle antithesis found throughout the essay.
What Kind of person does Henry David Thoreau seem to be? How would you characterize his state of mind and emotion as he composed “Civil Disobedience”?
Thoreau's Civil Disobedience talks about politics, government and the issues concerning these areas today. "Government is best which governs least." This motto means that the government should not have complete power over the people. The people's opinion is what matters the most. Individualism is stressed throughout his writing. To stand up for what you believe in and not bend backwards for the government is necessary. He speaks of Slavery and the war in Mexico and how is must be put to a stop. The people are responsible for this happening. Many people opposed these things yet did nothing to change it. Allowing yourself to be a part of injustice makes you a part of the negativity. Paying taxes to a corrupt government makes you
The two pieces of literature, Henry David Thoreau’s “Civil Disobedience” and Harlan Ellison’s “’Repent, Harlequin!’ Said the Ticktockman”, are two very distinct pieces of literature, but they are also very closely related. The quote is related to the short story because the concept of the quote is exemplified by the story. The machines are the people who conform, the leaders of the state by their heads are the Ticktockman and his staff, and the hero and enemy is Everett C. Marm, who is also known as the Harlequin. A way that the quote is exemplified in the story is that each element of the quote, the machines, leaders of the state by their heads, and the hero that is seen as an enemy, are personified in the short story.
"That government is best which governs least." Or is it? Should the American people be free to rebel against laws they consider unjust? Henry David Thoreau addresses these issues in his essay, Civil Disobedience. Thoreau wholeheartedly accepts the declaration that the government is best which governs least, and would like to see it acted upon. One day, he hopes, we will be able to carry it out to the point where men can have a government that does not govern at all. Government "never of itself furthered any enterprise". He claims that the character of the American people, rather than the government, has kept the country free, settled the west and educated the people. If the government had not interfered, the people would have
The resistance to colonial and imperial rule, slavery, the Mexican American and Vietnam Wars, and segregation were all impacted by the idea that moral beliefs often clash with civil legislation. Even if Henry David Thoreau, a transcendentalist thinker, paid his poll tax, resistance through peaceful means in order to achieve a goal would still be used today as it has been throughout history. For example, citizens of Boston dumped over three hundred chests of tea into the harbor to protest taxation without representation (“Boston Tea Party’’). Credit must be given, however, to the man who first expressed the idea of civil disobedience in writing. Thoreau’s adamant dislike for slavery and the Mexican-American war, and his disgust for those who
In 1849 transcendentalist Henry David Thoreau wrote “ On the Duty of Civil Disobedience.” Thoreau was a transcendentalists, which means he examined and analyze the reasoning process that governs the nature of experience. Throughout his essay Thoreau portrays his questioning of reasoning process that governs the nature of experience in a candid way. One way he does this is by the use of aphorisms. A specific aphorism would include, the example above. I agree fully with Thoreau’s statement.
Not only were many laws changed and created, but even more were broken in an attempt to better our once unjust society. Martin Luther King Jr., arguably the most influential leader of this movement, was an avid supporter of civil disobedience during this era. He participated in countless sit-ins and protests, including the Montgomery Bus Boycott in 1956, in which he and almost one hundred other activists were arrested for peacefully protesting discrimination in the Montgomery public transit system. In “Letter from Birmingham Jail”, written in 1963 after he was arrested for partaking in a nonviolent protest, King offers explanation as to why he practices civil disobedience and what he hopes to achieve in doing so. In this letter, King admits, “In no sense do I advocate evading or defying the law…that would lead to anarchy. One who breaks an unjust law must do so openly, lovingly, and with a willingness to accept the penalty”. However, he also stated that in this fight, it is necessary to “[stand] up for what is best in the American…thereby bringing our nation back to those great wells of democracy which were dug deep by the founding fathers in their formulation of the Constitution and the Declaration of Independence”. In his words, civil disobedience is more than ignorance of law; it is just one of the necessary measures that must be taken to restore equality in a
Resistance to Civil Government (Civil Disobedience) is an essay written based on his disproval’s and arguments about mistreatment from the government. Within Henry David Thoreau essay, he points out his views on how he sees people getting treated for being different. Henry David Thoreau believed that people should fight for their rights like everyone other citizens has. Henry David Thoreau illustrates in his essay, “But a government in which the majority rule in all cases cannot be based on justice, even as far as men understand it” . Henry David Thoreau sees and knows that the government has no justice towards the people, those who get their rights see it as
Henry David Thoreau was an American writer and protester, who wrote the influential essay “Civil Disobedience”. In his essay, he advocates for citizens to protest against government actions that they deem unjust and to stand up for one’s rights, putting morals before law,
Rosa Parks, an activist in the Civil Rights Movement, once remarked, “You must never be fearful about what you are doing when it is right.” Civil disobedience is defined as refusing to obey a governmental act by using nonviolent methods. Throughout world history, many activists have used civil disobedience in order to achieve their goals. Some of the more famous examples include the Soweto youth uprising which occurred in South Africa in June 16, 1976. Two very famous advocates and users of civil disobedience are Henry David Thoreau, author and philosopher, as well as Martin Luther King Jr., a Baptist minister and activist. In all three of these aforementioned cases, civil disobedience proved effective as it allowed the activists involved to achieve their respective goals.
The political concepts of justice and how a society should be governed have dominated literature throughout human history. The concept of peacefully resisting laws set by a governing force can be seen as far back as the Ancient Greeks; within the works of Sophocles and Socrates. Since then, this popular idea has developed over the centuries into what is commonly known today as civil disobedience. Due to the works of Henry David Thoreau and Martin Luther King Jr. civil disobedience is a well-known political action in the United States; first in the application against slavery and second in the application against segregation. Thoreau’s essay “Civil Disobedience” and King’s “Letter from Birmingham Jail” are the leading arguments in defining what it means to protest for a cause. Throughout history there has always been a need for civil disobedience, and it is now more prevalent in our world than ever.
A strong argument in support of peaceful resistance is present in Henry David Thoreau’s Civil Disobedience. Thoreau’s essay illustrates the concept that to be respected and acknowledged by government, one must speak out against it,