preview

Hiking Backpacks: Textbook Analysis

Decent Essays

There are several elements to take into account when buying a new hiking backpack, just like there are several elements to take into account when watching formal reviews of these same backpacks. The first element for a good review to have an adequate search title. If the video only comes up when searching the specific title, then the video is not as exposed to the public therefore making it a little irrelevant unless the person is an experienced hiker and they know exactly what they are looking for. For example when looking for the new Osprey Atmos AG 65 pack review, all that needs to be searched to put it up is “atmos backpack.” Likewise when looking for a review on the Deuter Guide 35 Plus pack, the only thing that has to be typed into the …show more content…

Each review has its own advantages and disadvantages to the quality of the filming. The Osprey review was shown outside in the snow because that is what the backpack is specifically designed for, hiking in the cold weather mountainous regions. However, sometimes the quality of the video was lost due to the fact that it was actually snowing while the video was being made. Perhaps if they would have waited until it quit snowing but there was still snow on the ground, they would have received the same target effect without having to compromise the quality of the video. Even though the quality may not have been the best that it could have been, the editing of the video was done very well. When a video is edited too much or not well enough it can cause sort of a lag between the person in the video and what the reviewer sees. This can create a confusion with the audience and they might be concerned that they missed something. In the Osprey review, the editing was done very well. Even though he switched from the full body view of him with the pack to just close ups of the pack, his speech was continuous so that the viewer does not get the sense of confusion and it just makes the video flow very nicely. While the actual video quality of the Deuter review was better than the Osprey, the poor editing skills made the video suffer. Because the …show more content…

This is an area that the Osprey review excelled in. The review was arranged spatially so that he started with the back of the pack and then moved to the top and worked his way down the front side of the pack showing all of the compartments and what they are most likely used for while on a hike. This helps the audience to follow the reviewer and have the same thought pattern which helps to understand the review and to also move through the pack and the video more effectively. While the Osprey video moved efficiently through the design of the backpack, the Deuter did not. The coherence of the review was compromised because the reviewer chose to jump around the pack from the outside to the inside then back again. It made it hard to know where each compartment that he was talking about actually was on the backpack. All of the jumping around coupled with the poor editing can cause some of the audience to become confused and make them lean toward a different

Get Access