preview

How Does George Kill Lennie's Death

Decent Essays

In the novel “Of Mice and Men” by John Steinbeck, George makes the painful decision to kill his best friend Lennie. If George wouldn’t have killed Lennie, Curley would have eventually found him and killed him brutally. George had good intentions towards the death of his friend and found himself in a position where he could never escape. Mercy killing is moral and is just a way to show compassion for a loved one in need. The killing of Lennie was not done with bad intent and was one of George’s only options.

The killing of Lennie was done without malicious intent. Throughout the book, George takes care of Lennie by protecting him and providing him with basic needs. Killing Lennie was not an easy choice for George and was an unquestionably …show more content…

For example, George did not intend to give Lennie a painful death and did what he thought was the best option. In the end, George actually saved Lennie from a more painful death from Curley. For instance, Candy’s dog was taken from him and eventually got killed by Carlson. Even then, the killing of his dog had a reason and is considered as a merciful death. Carlson made plenty of remarks throughout the chapter, explaining why the dog should be killed and exclaimed that he does not know, “nothing that stinks as bad as an old dog”(44). Carlson tried sweetening the idea of mercy killing, explaining how Candy’s dog, “wouldn’t even quiver”(45) if he killed him. All in all, Carlson did not want Candy’s dog to live in pain and wanted to give him a brisk, peaceful death. The killing of Candy’s dog conveys the idea that Lennie may face a similar fate. Society did not seem to tolerate the weak during The Great Depression, which may have been because of the rough and brutal conditions people were living under. Lennie’s death is a realistic view of what might have actually happened during the 1930s. George’s killing of Lennie was to save him from experiencing a more brutal and painful death in the

Get Access