How To Wear Body Cameras Essay

There has been some debate on the matter of whether or not law enforcement officials should wear body cameras or not. Law enforcement officers should wear body-worn cameras because it will help the officers while on patrol and the offender while being arrested or stopped. This topic has been debated for a long period of time. It really came to light when Michael Brown, an 18 year old african american boy, was shot and killed in August of 2014 by Officer Wilson, in Ferguson, Missouri.

​Based on research from Rasmussen College, body cameras primary use is to “improve behavior” and provide “a clear picture of what happened at the incident” (Erstad). Because officers are often accused for the use of excessive force; these cameras will allow the officers to be responsible for their actions. Not only does it provide accountability for the police officers, but for the personnel that they interact with as well. I participated in a ride along with the sheriff’s department on March 16,

Within recent years there has been much controversy surrounding police officers and whether or not they should be wearing body cameras to document their everyday interactions with the public. While the use of body cameras may seem to invade the public or police privacy. Police-worn body cameras will be beneficial to law enforcement and civilians all over the world. Police must be equipped with body cameras to alleviate any doubt in the effectiveness of officers. Law enforcement worn body cameras would enhance the trust of the public by keeping both the officers and the citizens accountable for their actions, providing evidence, and helping protect them from false accusations, while protecting privacy

Police officers should have to be required to wear body cameras to ensure the safety of the citizens and to provide evidence for a court case. Many times the police have gotten away with too many things and commit crimes that go unnoticed It’s time we put a stop to that and we make a change. With the use of body cameras that police force would be more trustworthy, they wouldn’t commit crimes, and they would be able to supply the court with undisputable evidence.

In today 's society, one highly debatable topic is whether or not law enforcement agents should wear body cameras. Most cameras used by law enforcement agencies across the country record audio and video, therefore, the cameras see and hear nearly everything a law enforcement officer does. There are many advantages to law enforcement personnel using body cameras while on duty because it holds the officers accountable, is used to document the contact made between the officers and the victims and/or suspects, supports the “use of force” action, keeps the officers and citizens honest, and the videos can even be used for training for other officers.

There has been a lot of talk lately in the news about police body cameras. Some people agree that body cameras should be used by all police officers, while others disagree and believe that they shouldn’t be used at all. There are some cons to having body cameras but all of the pros outweigh it. Police body cameras should be used in all towns no matter how small because the people will act less aggressive towards officers, they provide truthful evidence that cannot be altered with, and the videos can be stored so if something were to happen, they could be brought up and checked as sort of like a surveillance device.

Body cameras in policing are still new, but more and more agencies are beginning to implement this technology into their line of work. At first police officers were very hesitant to wear these body cameras because they were afraid they would infringe themselves and give away their own privacy. Later, as body cameras were beginning to see more use in the work place, officers began to realize that these very own body cameras that they once thought would only cause themselves harm would actual prove to be useful in a variety of situations. Some of these situations can be citizen complaints, to even backing up an officers use of force. Body cameras can be the one sole thing that can give

Historically speaking, authorities of the law were never in a position where their professional duties and their character as a public servant of the law were demeaned in a way that there needs to be constant surveillance of them and the people whom they come into contact with. There was never a need of documenting every encounter you had with a civilian before. In this day in age, things have certainly changed, and the past has always been something society likes to change and make better even if it raises concerns. Due to all the violent police stories that has surfaced in the past decade, the idea of having police officers wear video cameras as a part of their uniform while on duty has resulted in a radically divergent account of society’s future. The law may uphold cops to wear cameras while working, but is this really the best decision? This topic is very controversial and may create issues with cops and the civilians they try and protect in the future.

Police officers should wear body cameras at all times on duty because it creates more evidence. Body cameras document everything from witnesses,victims,and suspects. “Perceived benefits that body-worn cameras offer—capturing a video recording of critical incidents and encounters with the public, strengthening police accountability, and providing a valuable new type of evidence—largely outweigh the potential drawbacks. (Ziv). This supports the argument because body cameras will be able to record any incidents and report them with the public. This quote support my big argument because only the officers and the victims knows what going on in a situation. This quote supports the position because now there will be clear evidence in certain

Body cameras should not be worn by police officers because they are expensive and unreliable. First of all, body cameras should not be worn by police because they are costly. According to

Police officers should wear body cameras because it will decrease hostility. Body cameras will help to encourage civilians to be less abusive if they are stopped by a cop for any reason. “Everyone is on their best behavior when cameras are running (Ron miller, chief of police, Topeka, Kansas police Department). For example, Keith Scott was shot by the police in North Carolina because the police said he had a gun. However, his wife and other people said he had a book, not a gun. If the police had been wearing body cameras it would have brought up the truth about the

Police officers, the men and women Americans are expected to trust our lives with, have nobody watching them to make sure their job is done correctly. Does this sound safe? Police officers are repeatedly breaking traffic laws. Police brutality has become a common topic in the United States. Officers wearing cameras would also help solve multiple investigations. Police officers should have to wear cameras to keep them from abusing their power and to get to the bottom of investigations faster.

I’m not against the use of body worn cameras because the advantages and disadvantages are pretty even. Officers should be allowed to turn these body cams on and off at their own discretion. It’s not fair for officers to have them on during their entire shift. Moreover, I think the use of the law enforcement body

Do you think police officers need body cams and dashboard cams on them?If not, Imagine you're walking to the store by yourself.A disturbance happened in the store,so the police was called.The police asks you questions and you get quite smart and rude with them.They ask you for some identification to identify who you are,and you reach in your pockets to get them.The next thing you know the gun be will drown out and they will shoot you most likely kill you and guess what there is no evidence because its your word against there's and most likely they will believe them because there is no proof saying that they shot you.Now do you think they need cameras on them at all times.Cause others may think differently.

My partner and I do not think is so. We believe that police officers should not wear body cameras while on duty. However, body cameras are quickly becoming a standard gear for police officers. They are said to be the “technological answer” to protests about racial bias and unnecessary force such as the case of Brown v. Ferguson mentioned by Stefany. In fact, police departments that have bought them are dealing with some consequences like expense, privacy, and limitations.