The debate of human evolution being fact or fiction has been around for hundreds of years. Evidence of human ancestry has been found in many parts of the world and these fossils found have been proven to be human. The parts of the world include Eurasia and Africa. Although fossils are found in Eurasia, the human ancestor the Hominoidea has been traced back to the Miocene epochs, which were 23 to 5 million years ago. The Hominoidea is a super-family, which contains many species that are existent today including, gibbons, orangutans, gorillas, chimpanzee, and humans. Throughout history humans have migrated and evolved, as evolution occurred humans became more technologically advanced, while the other species in Hominoidea remained the same. …show more content…
The anatomical and genetic divergence appalled scientists, thus altering human evolution in the last few hundred thousand years. Morally, human evolution has become even more of a mystery in one portion, while another is well defined. An allusion at new complexity came from a femur in a cave called Sima de los Huesos. The DNA from the femur once again was Denisovans, thus corroborating they weren’t just in Siberia. Since the seventies scientist have brought back several fossils from Spain. Dr. Arsuaga alone has found twenty-eight complete skeletons of humans over three decades. DNA from Spain explained that the humans in the cave were neither Neanderthal or Denisovan, but a hybrid of the two. Beth Shapiro an expert in ancient DNA believes the humans from Sima de los Huesos could be yet another branch of humans. Humans have been interbreeding with the other species too, proven in a discovery that Neanderthal and human interbreed approximately fifty thousand years ago (Zimmer 2013). There are four initial stages of human evolution that don’t include pre-human primates which are: Australopithecus, three million years ago; Homo habilis, two million years ago; Homo erectus, one million years ago; and Homo sapiens, two hundred thousand years ago to present-day. Human derivation and evolution transpired in the tropical environments of the eastern hemisphere, and it spanned about twenty million years
For many years there has been a debate over where modern humans originated from. The first theory, out of Africa, discusses modern humans evolving in Africa. They migrated out to Eurasia and as the time went on their species evolved independently and developed into distinct species. All other human populations were eventually replaced with no interbreeding involved in the process and Homo sapiens had successfully dominated the rest of the world. On the other hand, the second theory, regional continuity, says that our earliest hominid ancestors had departed Africa and spread into other parts of the world later evolving into modern human beings. In this paper I will discuss the Regional continuity theory and elaborating on the Out of Africa theory. Evidence based on fossils, artifacts, and other crucial components will be discussed. Based on the evidence found I will come to a conclusion as to which theory I think best fits the origins of humans.
Human evolution is the biological and cultural development of humans. A human is any member of the species Homo sapiens, meaning "wise man." Since at least the Upper Paleolithic era, some 40,000 years ago, every human society has devised a creation myth to explain how humans came to be. Creation myths are based on cultural beliefs that have been adopted as a legitimate explanation by a society as to where we came from.
In the Article “Redrawing Humanity’s Family Tree” by John Noble Wilford, describes how two different skulls challenge the theories of human origins and migrations. The Central African skull, that dates back to nearly 7 million years ago, was assigned to a whole new genus and species because of its apelike and evolved hominid species. The 1.75-million-year-old Georgian skull shows evidence that the first hominids may have been intercontinental travelers who set motion the migrations that occupied the whole planet. Finally a third skull was found that is the same age and shares a resemblance but, the size of the skull suggests that the brain was smaller than expected for H. erectus.
timeline of modern humans, Homo sapiens, and how long they have been in existence. According to mainstream science, popular belief holds that the history of our species is confirmed to be confined to the past 12,000 years. This figure is a culmination based on what we know about evolution and what we have been able to gather through fossil analyzation and dating of artifacts as well as human remains. Although the subject of human antiquity, also referred to as human origins, does not prompt a great deal of debate there may actually be the need for some. A reexamination of the notion that humans have only existed a mere 12,000 years should be considered as there may be evidence to support a much greater antiquity of modern human life. Alternative researchers have offered up evidence of “forbidden archeology” that contradicts the mainstream beliefs of human origins, however these discoveries seem to have been swept under the scientific rug.
“How old is the oldest human fossil?,” If you had said about 700,000 years, you would probably have been right until just recently that is, “The September 1998 issue of Discover magazine”, reports that Ernesto Abbate, a geology professor from Florence, Italy, has just discovered the fossilized skull and teeth of a humanlike creature who might have lived, as far back as, one million years ago. Calling this creature Buia Man after the city in northeastern Africa where the remains were found. Prof. Abbate thinks he has discovered the earliest fossil that displays physical features associated with Homo sapiens, the species to which modern humans belong. Moreover, Buia Man says, Prof. Abbate also shows physical
Human evolution is “the process by which human beings developed on Earth from now-extinct primates” (Human Evolution, 2017). It is thought that human evolution began with a species of ape called Australopithecus, or one referred to as Neanderthals. These species most closely resemble the beginning of humans because they were a type of ape that walked up-right. As time progressed our primates began to adapt to the environment, and slowly changed into who we are today; Homo sapiens. Charles Darwin— an English naturalist, geologist, and biologist—was known for developing the theory of evolution. He explained that evolution was a “decent with modification” (On the Origin of Species, 1859). This meant that we all originated from a different species. However, we do not look exactly alike because we adapted to the environment we were exposed to. Although we all originated form a certain species, after undergoing serval mutations throughout generations to ensure
Although modern humans are of the only surviving ancestors in today's society other groups of early humans did used to walk where we walk. Which is why the greatest mystery and biggest question of human evolution is what happened to the Neanderthals. Neanderthals were the early group of humans who used to live in Europe and Asia thousands of years before Homo-Sapiens took over the world population. Many believe Neanderthals died off leaving nothing behind but scientist have provided that most humans have neanderthal DNA within them. Leading people to believe that our ancestors had interbred with Neanderthals. As Neanderthal DNA is 99.7 percent identical to modern human DNA providing that Neanderthal genes continue to lurk on within modern
During the 1980s, three specialists, Allan Wilson, Rebecca Cann and Mark Stoneking, worked together on another theory that supports Charles Darwin's speculation, the “Mitochondrial Eve” hypothesis. In these tests, the scientists solemnly focused on mitochondrial DNA, human genes that lay within the cell and are passed from mother to child. These genes allow mutation, as they mutate quickly for adaptation, thus allowing those studying to find and track changes during short time periods. By focusing on these genes and comparing their differences, the three scientists were able to create a hypothesis about the time and place when modern humans began to evolve. According to their findings, they believe that modern humans are decentants from a single population, while earlier humans e.g. Neandertals and Homo erectus, had become extinct. Furthermore, the team compared the DNA of numerous people of differerent ethnic backgrounds and concluded that all humans did indeed evolve from 'one mother' in Africa about 150,000 years ago.
To begin, Diamond talks about our evolutionary relatives, the apes. The history of humanity began in Africa about seven million years ago, when the African apes evolved into three categories. They evolved into gorillas, chimps, and humans. The earliest species of humans, Homo Habilis and Homo Erectus, became closer to modern humans in physical traits about 2.5 million years ago. One million years ago, Homo Erectus began to migrate out of Africa to Europe, Australia, Asia, etc. Homo sapiens first appeared around half a million years ago, having evolved from Homo Erectus. There is no perfect definition of Homo sapiens and therefore no exact date for when they first appeared. Still, scientists and anthropologists usually agree that Homo
In this lab, section 3EG2 went to the American Museum of Natural History. At the museum, we gained more insight on human evolution, how fossils are dated using multiple techniques, and the evidence from fossils to reconstruct the hominid history. Human evolution states modern humans evolved from primates gradually from generation to generation over the time of millions of years and the H. sapiens (modern humans) are currently the only known descendants of the first known hominid (Lucy). To unmask the mystery surrounding this history, scientist have developed several techniques to estimate the age of fossils and their connection to the evolution. One technique scientists have used to determine the age of fossils is by observing the age of the
From this, it was discovered that Neanderthals share the language gene, Fox P2, with modern humans. Both species of DNA was compared and scientists found that one to four percent of Neanderthal DNA is present in modern humans. This suggests that early Neanderthals must have mated with humans in order to produce fertile offspring. It was also shown that Europeans and Asians are more closely related to Neanderthals than Africans; supporting the Out-of-Africa theory. The significance of the female Neanderthal bones found in the cave in the Spain is that Neanderthals may have had complex beliefs and this may have showed their burial rituals.
Human evolution is the gradual process in which people, or Homo sapiens, originated from apelike ancestors. Scientific evidence, particularly in the form of fossils and secondary remains, show that the physical and behavioral traits shared by all people evolved over a period of approximately six million years. Humans are primates. Both genetic and physical similarities show that humans and the great apes (large apes) of Africa, chimpanzees (including bonobos, or so-called “pygmy chimpanzees”) and gorillas share a common ancestor that lived between 8 and 6 million years ago. The volume of fossils found in Africa suggests that most evolution occurred there and is likely the place of origin for early humans. This brings to fruition the “out of Africa” theory, also called the “single-origin hypothesis.”
There has been a great deal of heated debate for the last few decades about where modern Homo sapiens originated. From the battle grounds, two main theories emerged. One theory, labeled “Out-of-Africa” or “population replacement” explains that all modern Homo sapiens evolved from a common Homo erectus ancestor in Africa 100,000 years ago. The species began to spread and replace all other archaic human-like populations around 35,000 to 89,000 years ago. The rivaling opinion, entitled the “regional continuity” theory or “multiregional evolution” model refutes this theory and states modern humans evolved from various species of Homo erectus who interbred with others that lived in
Humans have existed on Earth for approximately 3.4 million years. The oldest known human ancestor is "Lucy," an Australopithecus. Over this extensive period of time, humans have evolved significantly. Homo Sapiens have grown from 3 to almost 6 feet (average), lost most of the body hair, became leaner and adapted to walking. Humans have come a long way, from Australopithecus to Homo sapiens, from living in trees to living in cities. Slowly, through hundreds of thousands of years, we mutated over and over again, natural selection ensuring that no destructive mutations continue. From the slow evolution, four distinctive species emerged and died out, each giving way to its ' descendant: Homo Habilis, Homo Erectus, Homo Sapiens Neanderthalesis, and Homo sapiens Sapiens.
Human evolution according to research started over 6 million years ago. The outcome of the evolution process is the current human beings. Scientific studies have revealed over the years a remarkable affinity between the chimpanzees/Apes and human beings. Even though this reality is not a definitive prove that human beings evolved from apes, it does show that the human beings are in one way or another related to other primates. Scientists suppose that the humans and the primates shared a common ancestor. The subject of what makes humans what they are and their origin has been the exclusive purpose leading to many scientific studies globally (Coolidge & Wynn, 2011). Studies believe that Africa was the origin of evolution millions of years ago. Fossil remains have been discovered in different parts of Africa as well as other regions of the world. Different hominins have been discovered around the world in the last 1 million years. Thus, the different discoveries have led to comparisons between the various species of hominins to clarify on their similarities as well as differences. This essay seeks to explain whether they were distinctively different species or regional versions of the same species.