preview

Hurricane Mitch In Central America

Decent Essays

Background

Following Hurricane Mitch in 1998, the Center for Development in Central America (CDCA) was established in Nicaragua with the purpose of serving people affected by the hurricane. The CDCA started a health clinic to provide needed health care and health education in the community of Nueva Vida, part of the larger Ciudad Sandino urban area (population 110,000). The area of Nueva Vida grew as a place for displaced persons following Hurricane Mitch and continues to be a place where homeless people come to create makeshift housing.

Mosquito-borne illnesses (MBI), transmitted through mosquito bites, are a major public health issue in Nicaragua and the Western Hemisphere. In January 2016, the World Health Department (WHO) reported …show more content…

However, the distribution of specific illness was different for each of the etapas. Etapa 1 had the highest prevalence of malaria at 1.73%. Etapa 2 had the highest prevalence of Chikungunya at 34.9%. Etapa 3 had the highest prevalence of Zika at 0.35%. Etapa 5 had the highest prevalence of Dengue. There were no reported cases of malaria for etapa 5

Spatial video, when displayed in Contour Storyteller, was used to identify risks along the collection path; a total of 1589 water risks, 322 trash points, and 117 dogs were identified. The spatial video was “coded;” identified risks were digitized in Google Earth, translated to Arc GIS 10.3, analyzed using, and then contoured accordingly. Figure 2 displays the result map for the 50m KDE. This contour map shows high concentrations of standing water in the neighborhood. The main water risks identified were drainage trenches filled with water and trash located in close proximity to …show more content…

First, the survey was limited by the depth of the questions asked of respondents. Survey participants were not asked when they or members of their household contracted mosquito-borne illness, and they were not asked to describe the symptoms they experienced. Laboratory data was not available to confirm information provided. There was a language barrier between the promotores, who conducted the survey, and those recording the data; this may have prevented data from being recorded correctly in all cases. Promotores also administered the survey differently. Recall bias is also a potential concern, as participants may not remember exact diagnoses or the number of family members effected by each illness. Finally, data was not able to be collected for the entire community as a number of people refused to participate in the survey and some homes did not have anyone present to take the

Get Access