preview

Ian Mcewan's Enduring Love

Decent Essays

In Enduring Love, each character has a unique personality, causing a multitude of perspectives. It is an evaluation of human behavior. Since there are a number of different opinions and reactions, it could be hard to decipher who truly made the correct decision, but Joe’ rational eventually prevails compared to the irrational behavior and reactions of the other characters. McEwan uses Joe to the benefits having a scientific mind. He defends the process of thinking rationally by portraying other inappropriate responses to significant events. In Enduring Love, Ian McEwan contrasts the inappropriate behaviors of Clarissa and Parry with Joe’s pragmatic thinking; he presents Parry’s mental illness and Clarissa’s extreme ambivalence as evils and …show more content…

Joe is driven into mania and shock from the accident, so he tries to calm himself by keeping himself occupied (McEwan 43). Although Clarissa wants to calm Joe down, she does so in the wrong way. She is ambivalent to his reaction and rants; no one would have wanted to hear Joe vociferate about Parry’s obsession, but she does not even try to comfort him. Her indifference to the situation comes off like she does not care. It appear that she does not want him to have an emotional reaction, whatsoever. Clarissa says she is in a relationship with Joe because she wants a rational, dependable man, but this incident causes Joe to waver on the emotional side. Clarissa wanted Joe’s rants to stop, but “he seems unaware that his arguments are no more than ravings, they are an aberration and they have a cause. He is therefore vulnerable, but for now she cannot make herself feel protective. Like her, [Joe] has reached the senseless core of Logan’s tragedy, but he has reached it unaware.” …show more content…

Her lack of presence begins in the very start of the book. Joe bolts after the hot air balloon, while she does not even move. It is possible that she is in such shock that she could not react, but looking back to this situation, it begins the point where she is no longer truly supporting Joe. She is classified as a ’romantic’, but she fails to fulfill that role. Had she been a true romantic, she would have stayed by Joe’s side the entire time. She thinks that she is seeing the good in Parry; in reality she is just doubting Joe and repeatedly undermines Parry as a threat. After Parry proves that he is a huge menace, Clarissa still does not completely acknowledge or accept that she was wrong, “She seemed to agree with me that he was mad and that I was right to feel harassed. ’Seemed’ because she was not quite whole-hearted, and if she said I was right - and I thought she did - she never really acknowledged that she had been wrong. I sensed she was keeping her options open, though she denied it when I asked her” (McEwan 100). Joe is driven into mania over the situation, but Clarissa just assumes that Joe is flattering himself and blowing the entire situation out of proportion. Clarissa believes that she is without error: “She thinks she understands Parry well enough. A lonely inadequate man, a Jesus freak who is probably living off his parents, and dying to connect with someone,

Get Access