Infidelity Review Essay

From a different perspective, women’s role in the corporate workplace has evolved from traditionally being just a pretty face to one in which a woman’s unique talents are valued. It was not that many years ago that women were hired based on looks and performed menial tasks like answering the phone to take messages and bring coffee to the boss. Their skills, work ethic and intelligence are evaluated far more than appearance alone.

“We all know that appearance matters, but the price of prejudice can be steeper than we often assume” (Washington1.) Published originally in the Washington Post on May 23,2010 by Deborah L. Rhode. Rhode the Professor of law and legal director at Stanford University in her essay “Why Looks Are The Last Bastion Of Discrimination,” argues that an individual's physical appearance is one of the few qualities of their personal identity that other people are legally within their rights to discriminate against. Rhode states her thesis clearly explaining the forthcoming reasons she will offer to uphold her position. Rhode believes that discriminating against individuals based on their appearance is wrong, and is often overlooked in many environments such as the workforce. Many think it is crucial that discrimination on looks is banned in workplaces, schools, and most other organizations.

Gender stereotypes are one of the most common encountered on a daily basis. The infamous ‘Glass Ceiling’ still exists in many areas of the professional world, restricting valid promotions simply based on gender. This type of concept can be verified by looking at comparative weekly wages of other professionals in a variety of industries. Most people will generally see female dominated occupations, such as nurse, teacher and secretary as requiring feminine personality traits and physical attributes for success; whereas male dominated occupations such as doctor, lawyer, and business executive are seen to require male personality traits for success (Sanderson, 2010, p. 344).

There are many ways in which infidelity can be explained depending on what you are reading or with whom you are speaking. Emotional and sexual infidelity is the two most studied forms of infidelity. The cognitive approach to infidelity explains that as our cognition is developing, we are also indirectly learning behaviors that could contribute to infidelity as adults. Infidelity no matter what the circumstances are surrounding it can leave both partners devastated. The circumstances surrounding infidelity can include a broad range excuses. The evolutionary approach to infidelity explains that men are more distressed by their partners committing sexual infidelity, whereas

If a Price Waterhouse female partner presented Hopkins with the anticipated appearance change, she may have been more receptive to change. Nevertheless, the underlying cause would still be sexist because the organization expects partners to look different then regular employees. Shaw (1990) provides insight about job analysis for appraisal system that includes employer’s expectations and measurement of those expectations. In order for this situation not to be considered sexist, Price Waterhouse need to establish standards and measurements from day one and enforce standards upon infractions for all employees.

In the article “Going for the Look, but Risking Discrimination” Steven Greenhouse explains how most companies hire people only for their appearance but not for their experience. The author first presents the problem of how a young girl described as having “long blonde hair, being 5ft 6 and striking” is mainly the description of someone a clothing store is looking for. Next, Greenhouse addresses how clothing store workers approach people, mainly for their appearance rather than asking them if they need help. Then, the author brings out Mr. Serrano, who used to work in the clothing area. Interviewers state that the managers such as Serrano has a recruiting process that many uses.

Steven Greenhouse, writer for New York Times, states in his article “Going for the Look,but Risking Discrimination”, that companies are hiring people based only on how attractive they look and are risking discrimination because of it. Greenhouse then supports his claim by giving examples, like L’Oreal, Gap, Abercrombie & Fitch, and W Hotel. He next proceeds to show that hiring based off looks can result in lawsuits and discrimination. Finally, he informs that stores have hired good looking people who are incompetent rather than hiring someone who is not that good looking but is experienced. Greenhouse’s purpose is to show that although it is not illegal to only hire attractive people, it might not be morally correct to just hire on looks.

Sheryl said, “Career progress often depends upon taking risks and advocating for oneself-traits that girls are discouraged from exhibiting “(646). Sheryl contends that there are more men going after top

I found an article “Women are judged more on appearance when job hunting: Employers of both sexes rate women on their photos but judge men more on the words in the application” The author focuses around studies of sexism in appearances, which shows how women are generally judged harsher than men. One of the studies

while having attractive employees can help make the store and its image more appealing, the discriminative undertones may make the whole thing worthless. the whole idea of this policy is to hire attractive people over those considered unattractive. Sometimes, the attractiveness of potential employees is based on a specific image that the company they work for want to project, and that image usually has a specific

We know temptation are everywhere in this sinful world and awareness is one of the important lessons prevent and take steps necessary guard ourselves and those around us. Before reading this book, I was not aware of those factors or thought about them as “close calls “to sexual infidelity but now I do. Awareness is everything in preventing what could affect us and those that are around us

Wolf discusses the effect that these standards are having on women in the workplace. A woman’s beauty, or lack of it, can be used against her. In 1986, Mechelle Vinson lost a sexual harassment case. “Vinson was young and ‘beautiful’ and carefully dressed. The district court ruled that her appearance counted against her.” (Wolf 38) “In Hopkins v. Price-Waterhouse, Ms. Hopkins was denied a partnership because she needed to learn to ‘walk more femininely, talk more femininely, dress more femininely,’ and ‘wear makeup’.” She brought in more business than any other employee. (Wolf 39)

The Halo Effect is the cognitive bias that generalizes that if an individual has one outstanding favorable character trait, the rest of that individual’s trait will be favorable. Specific to physical attractiveness, this is known as the “Attractiveness Halo.” Attractiveness plays an important role in determining social interactions. In fact, the physical attractiveness of an individual is a vital social cue utilized by others to evaluate other aspects of that individual’s abilities (Kenealy, Frude, & Shaw, 2001). Because of the attractiveness halo, attractive applicants trying to enter the workforce tend to

Overall people perceived as beautiful have more job opportunities as well as a higher chance for advancement in their carriers. A study was conducted by the University of North Carolina at Pembroke on the topic of the relationship between attractiveness of professors and the perceived quality of their teaching. What the study found out was a strong relationship between the two – “results indicated that as hotness ratings increased, so did ratings on overall quality, clarity, and helpfulness. Additionally, further analysis indicated that the greater the percentage of hotness ratings to overall ratings, the more likely that students rated the professors favorably.” Moreover research shows that attractive people perform better when interviewed. An interesting fact is

The article proposes that there is a positive relationship between beauty and labour market earnings and the impact of beauty is higher for men than women. However, the article fails to answer an important question: is the impact of beauty due to pure discrimination or