investing: developing production capability a report prepared by daliso chinkoyo for EGCM Ltd
To: Director of EGCM Ltd
From: Daliso Chinkoyo
Date: 23 April 2015
Subject: Developing Production Productivity The Developing Production Capability Report has been completed.
Abstract
This report explores two proposals being considered as part of developing the production capability at EGCM Ltd. The report considers peer reviewed articles and other credible sources written by experts in their field. Reviewing the research gathered, Proposal B offers the better investment plan as it carries attributes such as a lower payback period when compared to Proposal A. The report recommends that Proposal B is the overall better option for EGCM Ltd to invest into due to it outscoring Proposal A in all the comparisons that have been made.
Background
EGCM Ltd is a company which manufactures metal and is considering making a $28000 investment in developing their production capability. Two proposals, namely Proposal A and Proposal B have been drafted in order to find out which proposal is better suited for EGCM to make its investment. Proposal A requires an investment of $28000 and should have a positive net cash flow of $4480 annually for the first seven years. Proposal B requires an investment of $28000 and estimates net cash flows of:
Year 1 -$ 2800
Year 2 $ 3745
Year 3 $ 4480
Year 4 $ 6370
Year 5 $ 9170
Year 6 $ 9800
Year 7 $ 11200
Points that will be
Proposal one and proposal two have great similarities and differences, however while both proposals aim for an alike objective, one proposal is more detailed in how to accomplish the set goal, is more logistically feasible, appeals to more members of the community, and will most likely raise more money.
3. Estimate the project’s NPV. Would you recommend that Tucker Hansson proceed with the investment?
General Foods is a large corporation organized by product lines. They are evaluating Super Project, the manufacture of a new powdered dessert. Crosby Sanberg, a financial analysis manager, must determine the value in accepting the proposal, along with J.C. Kresslin, the Corporate Controller. The Super Project will increase profit with a payback period of less than ten years. The proposed capital investment for the project is $200,000 ($80,000 for building modifications and $120,000 for machinery and equipment) and production would take place
* A new project idea which requires an investment of $2 mm and will generate total cash flows (including any salvage or terminal value) next year of either $4mm (recession) or $8mm (boom). The firm has not yet raised the cash to make this investment, but the market is aware of the investment opportunity.
• Owner has limited capital: $15,000 for feasibility study; and $500,000 of trust money that will be made available for investment.
See Table 1: Expected non-operating cash flow when the project is terminated at year 4 = 165,880$
4.) What would the capital allocation plan look like if an additional $100,000 is made available?
The “Stock Market” is a term that actually describes several markets such as the New York Stock Exchange NASDAQ, where the stocks of companies are traded. Shares in a company are sold and the shareholders then become part owners of the company. Offering shares of stock raises money for continued research and development of company products or services.
Q1. Based on the 2004 statement of profit and loss data (Exhibits 1 and 2), do you agree with Water’s decision to keep product 103?
later in the project life. With a NPV of less than -$810,000, Scenario 6 is the project with the
Currently HVC has two investment opportunities: (1) Security Systems, a firm that needs additional capital to develop an Internet security software package, and (2) Market Analysis, a market research company that needs additional capital to develop a software package for conducting customer satisfaction surveys. In exchange for Security Systems stock, the firm has asked HVC to provide $600,000 in year 1, $600,000 in year 2, and $250,000 in year 3 over the coming three-year period. In exchange for their stock, Market Analysis has asked HVC to provide $500,000 in year 1, $350,000 in year 2, and $400,000 in year 3 over the same three-year period. HVC believes that both investment opportunities are worth pursuing. However, because of other investments, they are willing to commit at most
Yes, the purpose of a company is to maximum the profit, and as Elizabeth Barret suggested,it can help company to make more profit. So the capital investment proposal described in Exhibit 3 is an attractive on for QMSC.
1. Is the capital investment proposal described in Exhibit 3 and attractive one for Quality Metal Service Center?
Proposal three suggests that the plant that is in Nuremberg, Germany be expanded. It would cost a total of EUR15 million. Expanding this facility would increase capacity to an expected EUR2.25 million a year in additional production. Proposal four suggests that the company roll-out a new product of snack foods. The company has excess capacity that it could use to produce dried fruits and enter a new market. The IRR was expected to be 13.4% and the project would be able to support more expansions.