preview

Iranian Revolution Pros And Cons

Decent Essays

II- The Coup and the restoration of the Shah:
In 1951, Mohammad Musaddeq became the Prime Minister of Iran. He was the first prime minister who was not appointed by the shah, but officially elected by the public. He was a nationalist and the founder of the political opposition party, the National Front, in Iran in 1949. He was a western educated man who believed in democracy as the best solution in Iran. He was determined to free Iran from external powers, and to gain economic freedom and self-determination. Because he was an important figure in the political arena, he convinced the Majlis to refuse western oil concessions, and to limit the monarch’s powers. In his own words, he says:
If the ship captain is one individual only, whenever …show more content…

During early 1950’s, everything changed, and superpowers shifted. The U.S strengthened its political relations with Iran during the years. However, they were ignoring what was really happening in Iran, and the strong opposition to their interference and to the shah.
The Iranian Revolution of 1979 was an accumulation of misjudgments by the U.S. foreign policy makers of Washington D.C. It resulted from U.S. intervention in Iran’s internal affairs during the three decades that preceded the revolution. It came partially as a reaction to the political relations between Iran and the United States.
The major turning point in both countries history was the interference of the C.I.A in the coup d’état of 1953 through AJAX, the operation that imposed the dictatorship of the monarch and overthrew of what was going to be a democracy in Iran. This coup is seen as the most important action that led to the change of Iranians’ perspective toward Americans. It showed to the Iranians that America is only looking for its self-interest. Therefore, they started to perceive the U.S as imperialistic and an exploiter and no longer as a protector (from the British or the soviets)

Get Access