Throughout the play “Hamlet” William Shakespeare reveals traits of madness. Hamle (the main character of the play) has some traits of this. But the question begs to be answered, Is Hamlet truly mad. No, Hamlet is not truly mad. This becomes apparent especially in Act 3 Scene 1 and again in act 3 scene 1 before the encounter with ophelia.
In act 3 scene 1 right after Hamlet’s famous “To be or not to be” soliloquy, Hamlet and Ophelia exchange words. Ophelia tries to give him back jewelry that is supposedly his. Hamlet doesn’t believe her and denies her. “Ophelia- Take these again, for to the noble mind Rich gifts wax poor when givers prove unkind. There, my lord. Hamlet- Ha, ha, are you honest” (III, I, 105). This whole exchange between
…show more content…
Rosencrantz states “Nor do we find him forward to be sounded. But with a crafty madness keeps aloof” ( III, I, 8). This shows that Rosencrantz believes it is a “crafty madness”. If you are truly mad you can not have a “crafty madness”, the only way you can have a crafty madness is if you are purposely acting crazy and intentionally using a crazy persona to your advantage. This shows that Rosencrantz is onto Hamlets game of pretending to be mad. This satisfies Hamlets ego by getting people …show more content…
Simplephycology.net states “The ego considers social realities and norms, etiquette and rules in deciding how to behave” (https://simplypsychology.org/psyche.html). This states that Hamlet is taking into consideration how a crazy person might act, and than reciprocates that through the dialogue we hear when Hamlet has run ins with other secondary characters. Another way to spot Hamlet is faking madness is him directly saying he will act crazy in the near future. “Here, as before, never, so help you mercy, How strange or odd soe'er I bear myself (As I perchance hereafter shall think meet to put antic disposition on). ( I, V, 170). Or as no fear shakespeare translates it as “(. But now listen to me. No matter how strangely I act (since I may find it appropriate to act a little crazy in the near future)” (http://nfs.sparknotes.com/hamlet/page_74.html). This shows that hamlet is planning to act crazy in the future. This Satisfies his ego because Hamlet knows that his society knows what is right and wrong and so does Hamlet. He is acting crazy so he has a justification to kill his uncle. King Claudius killed his uncle but the kingdom does not know that,l only hamlet does so he can not just go and kill the king with no repercussions . Hamlet needs an excuse and being crazy is the perfect excuse. It is also apparent that Hamlet is faking his insanity when he states “I am but mad north-north-west. When the wind is southerly, I know a hawk
In Act I, Scene V, after hearing the ghost’s demand for revenge, Hamlet says in advance that he will consciously feign madness while seeking the opportune moment to kill Claudius. Therefore, it is hard to conclude that he coincidentally became insane after making such a vow. Hamlet’s supposed madness not only becomes his way of relating to the other characters during the majority of the play, but also that which develops his character as throughout the play. Still, the question remains: Is Hamlet really crazy or just pretending?
As well as that, Hamlet’s madness is used as an excuse. He does not have to answer any questions people may have about why he is acting weird which gives him more time to continue plotting to hurt Claudius. His objective was to appear crazy and make it believable, and in doing so it makes him appear even smarter. Hamlet acts like himself and only acts insane when it is necessary. When he talks to Horatio about watching Claudius for signs of guilt he says “Give him heedful note, for I mine eyes will rivet his face, and, after, we will both our judgments join in censure of his seeming (3.2.87)”. The way he speaks makes it clear that he is perfectly fine. Horatio is one of the only people he does not need to feine insanity to. As well as that,when he is explaining to the players how to act, he asks “You could, for a need, study a speech of some dozen or sixteen lines, which I would
Determining whether someone is insane or sane is very difficult to do. Looking at the actions of the individuals does not give the full picture. Hamlet plays the role of an insane man in order to get revenge on Claudius. Hamlet only tells Horatio and his mother that he is pretending while others believe he is insane. There are some that believe that Hamlet is insane due to the loss of his father but their evidence is not very strong. By looking at examples from the play that show Hamlet is pretending to be insane, we will clearly see that Hamlet is very successful in the act of being mad.
In Hamlet, he seems to be mad, but there is a question that everyone asks when reading or watching this play “was it, or was it not true that Hamlet was faking his insanity, really suffering, or maybe even both.” First, this is what insanity is: insanity is acting crazy, but not knowing that they’re acting crazy. Also, it’s going through a lot of stress at the same time causing you to act stranger then a normal person. Hamlet was not totally insane. It doesn’t fit.
Hamlet only owns up to his madness because it buys him time to stay and perform actions if he
To answer the question is Hamlet mad you have to define what it means to be mad. I would say that someone who is mad or crazy has no control over their mind. They would act incoherent and be unable to make sound decisions. I do not think that Hamlet is mad based on my understanding of what it means to be mad.
In Shakespeare's tragedy, Hamlet, the character of Hamlet feigns insanity. For a person in his situation, having one's peers think of one as crazy can be quite beneficial. His father, the king, had just died, and he is visited by a ghost who appears to be his father's spirit. The ghost tells Hamlet that he was murdered by his brother Claudius, who is now the current king and who recently married the former king's wife. Hamlet vows revenge and, as a tool to aid him in that plan, convinces people that he is crazy. The fact that he is acting, as opposed to actually being insane, can be seen in Hamlet's conversations with a watchman, two childhood friends, and his mother. Also, there are many actions in the play that he would not have
In conclusion, Hamlet is not mad; everything he does has a purpose. He is out to avenge his father’s murder. He proves this by telling Horatio that he is going to fake madness, and admitting to his mother that he is not crazy. He also only acts mad in front of Polonius, Claudius, Gertrude, Ophelia, Rosencrantz and Guildenstern. When Hamlet is with a trusted friend he is rational and symptom free, however when someone he wants to
Hamlet. A play by William Shakespeare. Was Hamlet actually crazy? What evidence shows he was mad, or if it was an act of revenge? Hamlet was mad. He lost his sanity once he had seen his ghostly father. The day Hamlet talked to his father is the day Hamlet went completely mad. All his obsessions with killing Claudius started then, no one saw Hamlet talk to his father, and no one knows what happened. From the grief and sadness of his father’s death made him snap once he saw King Hamlet again.
There is however evidence that Hamlet is actually mad. For example, Hamlet sees the ghost of his father when others do not, but this could also be seen as evidence to prove that he is not mad because there are others who did see the ghost as well. By using examples such as this, Shakespeare makes it difficult for the reader to distinguish Hamlet's actually insanity and feign of insanity if there even is one or
As demonstrated throughout the play, Hamlet’s madness is evident whether real or fake. In his own words, “I am mad but north-north-west: / When the wind southerly, I know a hawk from a handsaw” (II. ii. 377-78). Hamlet is claiming that he is frequently seen as crazy. However, he claims that he can choose the moments to be mad. Hamlet is speaking to Rosencrantz and Guildenstern stating that Hamlet knows what Rosencrantz and Guildenstern plan to do. The reader is again asked to consider whether Hamlet is faking his madness or whether he is, in fact, mad. In a monologue, he says, “How strange or odd some’er I bear / myself / As I perchance hereafter shall think / meet / To pit an antic disposition on” (I. V. 190- 92). The death of Hamlet’s father is something Hamlet cannot
Hamlet's madness is not in vain. As Polonius says in Act II, "Though this be madness, yet there is method in't" (109). The reason Hamlet is pretending to be insane is to exact revenge against his father's murderer, the King. He is aware that the King will be concerned about his behavior and he is right. After the play all the characters attend, the King is very disturbed. His reason for being disturbed is that he just witnessed a play which depicted the murder he committed against his own brother, the former King of Denmark. The King knows Hamlet knows of the murder and is aware that Hamlet may not be completely insane. Because he is afraid of losing his power and title of King, the King decides that Hamlet should go to England.
Hamlet portrayed extreme madness that recurred throughout the book. It started off with simply acting to be crazy, but eventually leads to true madness. Hamlet tells the queen “a beast… would have mourned longer, married with my uncle my father’s brother, but no more like my father” (1.2). Hamlet refers to his mother as a beast implying she is not human. Problems with Hamlet’s mother are not a huge contributing factor to his madness, but still fuel the problem. It also leads readers to believe Claudius could be a problem later on. This turns out to be true as he is one of the main sources to Hamlet’s madness. Another tremendous source is the ghost driving Hamlet to get revenge on Claudius. When the Ghost of Hamlet’s father comes back, he tells Hamlet “so art thou to revenge, when thou shalt hear”(1.5). The Ghost explains what really happened to try to convince Hamlet to avenge his death. This drives him to insanity with the stress and pressure of should he, or should he not kill
When reading Shakespeare’s Hamlet as a class, the first thing that most teachers or professors point out is the argument/idea of sanity, specifically Hamlet's sanity. I believe that Hamlet is, in fact, feigning his madness. What I do not know is if I believe this because it is what I was taught or if I came up with the idea myself based on my own interpretation. When I was taught Hamlet there was no argument it was just fact that he was faking his madness. Because of my confusion, I came to find that it may be interesting take out of the play any moment in which Hamlet makes the audience aware that he is only pretending that to be mad. I want to take out any proof that his madness isn’t real. The argument for legitimate madness is always
Hamlet is very good at playing with his words, and turning them around to define something completely different. Throughout the play, using his words, Hamlet tries to indirectly make his family aware that he is only acting mad, but nobody is ever able to break apart the puzzle of what he is telling them. Even when Hamlet does fully admit it, his family and friends still seem to see a real side to his madness. Hamlet told his mother, “Make you to ravel all this matter out. That I essentially am not in madness. But mad in craft” (3.4.191-192). In this quote, Hamlet fully says how he is not mad, and that it is all a craft to