b. Smoking in public does indeed affect non-smokers in a negative way and studies prove this to be true, from the year 1990 till now about 19% of non-smokers exposed to secondary tobacco smoke also like the actual smokers of tobacco have a greater chance of getting lung cancer due to the tobacco entering and damaging their lungs, than those who are not exposed to the tobacco smoke. With that being said, the implication of smoking in public is bad for the people around the person
Have you ever gone to a restaurant or to the bowling alley and come home smelling like cigarette smoke? And while you were there, some people are sitting there smoking by you and you can’t stand the smell of it. So you go out side and to get some fresh air and what do you know there’s some more people lighting it up and smoking but they are polite enough to go outside. Doesn’t this annoy you, that you can barely go anywhere without people smoking in your presence. This leads us to the question, Should smoking in public areas be allowed? Smoking in public areas is something that could definitely be dealt without. The things I will cover with you are the effects of smoking, the effects of
Public smoking has been an issue for people who do not take part in the smoking epidemic for as long as smoking has been around. What people need to understand is that individuals who do not engage in the activity of ruining their lungs are being forced into the act of involuntary smoking rather they like it or not, and that is unacceptable.
The smokers who choose to bring harm to themselves have the right to damage their health if they choose. The alternatives non smokers have are to not be in presence of smokers. Where public places advertise no smoking, and still supple designated areas for smokers they should still take in account that the smoke still ventilates the surrounding areas. My advice is not to engage where there is no smoking, and smoking areas. The fumes from the non smoking area cannot be contained completely. If you don’t want to stop passive don’t attend these public places. The article on line indicated if there was enough non-smokers going to these public facilities there would be no need to post no smoking () .
Harmful effect to non-smokers through many ways such as accessibility of tobacco product to the children of smoker parents, the children will be affected with the parent smoking behavior, passive smoking causes harmful effect to non-smokers such as respiratory diseases, heart diseases, cancers and others.
Smoking should not be permitted in public areas, since it’s not reasonable to force a non-smoker into inhaling unwanted toxic smokes into his own body. Just like one has the option of being a smoker, they other may have the right to pick the option of not wanting to be a passive smoker.
The proliferation of smoking bans means that, in many states, it is extremely difficult to find a place where it is legal to smoke in public. The smell of cigarette smoke also creates problems for people who live or work with non-smokers. And because cigarette smoking involves an open flame, there are safety concerns as
Smoking cigarettes are detrimental to everybody. Firstly, the effects on the user. Tobacco smoke contains at least 70 chemicals known to cause cancer (Cancer.org, 2017). The biggest risk that arises from smoking is lung cancer. It is the most commonly diagnosed cancer in Canada. In 2017 21,100 Canadians will die from lung cancer, 26% of all cancer deaths (Cancer.ca, 2017). Secondly, the smoking not only affects the perpetrator, but also the people around them. The second hand smoke increase the risk for near people to get lung cancer and heart problems. Children are at a bigger risk because their respiratory and immune systems are still developing (Canada.ca,2016). Finally, it affects the environment. The smoke from the cigarettes contain carbon and methane, two chemicals that pollute the atmosphere. Smoking worldwide releases 2.6 billion Kg of CO2 and 5.2 billion Kg of methane. Also, cigarettes buds are one of the
Other than affecting the health of the smoker, the second-hand smoke from smokers' cigarettes can also affect the health of others around them. When someone is smoking a cigarette in public or anywhere else there may be other people, they aren't only risking their own life, but the other people's lives around them as well. They need to recognize this and be more respectful to the others around them. Non-smokers who breathe in this second-hand smoke may experience allergies or a variety of different irritations. This is especially dangerous to pregnant women who are open to the second-hand smoke, for it can enlarge the risk of having an irregular birth. However, with a little bit of our help, in time these smokers can learn and will not allow
People should be more cautious when it comes to vaping because the people around them may not want that to in there face or seen with there kids. I think that instead of going in like restaurants and doing it or in stores they should do it at a park or a vape shop and maybe at home would be good so nobody us exposed to that. Vaping should be illegal because it's really not good for people at it makes them look not so very smart. People should be more aware of the effects on there life people just think that it's not gonna do anything to you because it's not smoking and even though there isn’t nicotine in it it's still has nicotine in it and can still damage your lungs. People shouldn't vape in public places because it is very disturbing.
Health impact is not only on cigarette smokers but also the ones next to them. “Secondhand smoke is composed of side stream smoke (the smoke released from the burning end of a cigarette) and exhaled mainstream smoke (the smoke exhaled by the smoker)” (Hong Kong Council on Smoking and Health, 2010). Report shows that the health impact on second-hand smokers is even greater than that on the smoker. (Schick, S., & Glantz, S., 2005) Third-hand smoke is the tobacco smoke that attached to clothing, wall, furniture, hair, skin and other materials after the cigarette is extinguished. So,
You do not have to be an active smoker to experience the harmful effects of smoke. Breathing in the smoke of active smokers is enough to cause you serious health issues. Non-smokers who breathe in secondhand smoke take in nicotine and other toxic chemicals causing them serious health issues. Exposure to environmental tobacco smoke damages their organs, mainly the lungs and brain.
Those criticizing the ban claim that smoking poses no immediate danger to people nearby. However, as we all know, this is far from true. Medical evidence proving the link between smoking and many fatal diseases is readily available. Smokers, as well as passive smokers, are vulnerable to heart attacks, strokes and cancers. Many members of the society have lost their
Smoking is known to be one of the most dangerous medicine and can come with some seriously negative to one’s lungs. Research studies have shown that second- hand smoking can be equally as bad. According to the 1964 Surgeon General’s Report, “2.5 million adults who were nonsmokers died because they breathed secondhand smoke” (Centers for Disease Control and Prevention). To those who own restaurants, oversee public places, and others in charge of entertainment venues, pay special attention to the content in this paper. Smoking should be banned inside public restaurants and businesses as well as outside public parks and other places. It is important that people understand the damaging negative effects of smoking in public. My opponents might argue that smoking is only inhaled by the smoker himself, rather than others around him or her. However, as said before, second hand smoking is just as dangerous to the smoker and the people around. People need to understand that smoking can trigger others’ asthma and cause them to have an attack. Some argue that if businesses had signs outside their building saying that the venue is a smoking environment, than this would dismiss the asthma problem. However, even if businesses did display signs outside the buildings, this may drive customers away, resulting in failure of the businesses. Second hand smoking is dangerous, banning smoking in public places will reduce litter from
Think about it, “isn’t having a smoking section in a restaurant like having a peeing section in a swimming pool?” “Why do drugstores make sick people walk all the way to the back of the store to get their prescriptions while healthy people can buy cigarettes at the front?” There have been debates and different opinions on whether smoking in public places is an issue or not. Of course, smokers would support and affirm their right to smoke where they please. As opposed to the other view, that smokers violate the non-smoker’s rights, and puts them at risk. The U.S. has funded an extensive amount of money in advertisement to quit smoking, making most Americans aware of the potential risks of smoking. What’s the result of smoking? Coffin. Smoking is the leading cause of lung and heart cancer, stated to cause those diseases in 90% of smokers. A significant number of cancers seen in people who don’t smoke can be pointed at the smokers. New York has place designated areas in public places to adhere to the smokers individual rights to smoke where they please. Some believe it is their constitutional right to smoke in public places while others suggest to ban smoking in public places altogether. The ones who want to ban smoking in public places worry about second-hand smoke, which put people who don’t smoke in danger of cancer, and pollutes the area. Smokers suggest they have been allowed to smoke where they pleased for years, and because of that shouldn’t be banned in public places.
The social effects are the last consequences. Non-Smokers usually don’t usually socialize well with smokers for a variety of reasons. For example, smokers often wake up with a dry mouth, and their non-smoker partners tend refuse to kiss them solely because of their bad breath. Cigars, pipes, tobacco and weed smokers