preview

Island Trees School District V. Pico Case Study

Good Essays

The United States Constitution grants American citizens the freedom of speech. This single line in the First Amendment has been a staple of American culture since its ratification on December 15, 1791 (Constitution Center, 2018). The Founders recognized the significance of this freedom and the power it had to shape a young nation. It was George Washington who declared-“If freedom of speech is taken away, then dumb and silent we may be led, like sheep to the slaughter” (Global Research, 2016). The legal definition of this vision is “the right to express information, ideas, and opinions- free of government restrictions based on content and subject only to reasonable limitations” (Merriam-Webster Dictionary, 2018). Consequently, this sole clause …show more content…

Pico.
The facts of the case are as follows. The Island Trees School District ignored the guidance of the appointed parent “book review” committee and its own staff and began pulling books from circulation in their libraries. The board of education responsible for the decision characterized said books as being, what they referred to as, “anti-American, anti-Christian, anti-Semitic, and just plain filthy” (West Law, 1982). Their unilateral decision thereby restricted the rights of the junior high and high school students under their supervision. Steven Pico (a high school student) recognized the censorship in pulling the 11 books, including titles such as The Best Short Stories by Negro Writers by …show more content…

Adults tend to abuse positions of power, especially when they have little to no understanding in an area they are tasked to safeguard. What is to say someone with a radical agenda comes to have the authority to decide what is considered acceptable material for children to read? There are too many unknowns. Furthermore, it is inarguably true that the freedom of speech was not intended to guard hate speech. It was intended to protect ideas from being deemed as “wrong” simply because they were different than that of the mainstream philosophy. Without a doubt, this is what makes the First Amendment so profound- it defends the sovereignty of individualism. This case ensured the right of students to have access to materials that are educationally relevant, thereby encouraging young minds to explore the people they have the potential to become as they grow. School libraries should be a place where children have the chance to explore worlds outside of their own. Japanese author Haruki Murakami proclaimed in one of his books “If you only read the books that everyone else is reading, you can only think what everyone else is thinking” (Murakami, 1987). For developing adolescents, the concept of challenging their peer group’s thought process is intimidating. Nevertheless, the ones who persist in that journey of questioning are the ones who disrupt the

Get Access