preview

J. K Galbraith: The Great Crash Of 1929

Good Essays

Roderick Harris Intro to Macroeconomics J.K Galbraith: The Great Crash of 1929 Book Review Widespread conjecture. Record-trading volumes. Assets bought not because of their value but because the buyer believes he can sell them for more in a day or two, or an hour or two. Welcome to the past, as we try to conjure the late 1920s into the present US. Every financial bubble since 1929 has been compared to the Great Crash - the risky actions of investors and the inquisitive inaction of the government, Galbraith notes that the problem wasn’t a scarcity of securities to buy and sell: “The ingenuity and zeal with which companies were devised in which securities might be sold was as remarkable as anything.” Citizens and minorities did not have a safety …show more content…

It stressed not only the diversity of its portfolio but also its counsel. It was fully protected from any traditional view of the market. Other trusts urged the excellent of their genius in other terms. Knowledge, manipulative skill, financial genius was not only the magic of the investment trust. There was also leverage. By the summer of 1929, one no longer spoke of investment trusts as such. One referred to high-leverages trusts, low-leverage trusts, or trust without any leverage at all. Leverage was achieved by issuing bonds, preferred stock, as well as common stock to purchase, more or less exclusively, a portfolio of common stocks. When the common stock so purchased rose in value, a tendency, which was always assumed, the value of the bonds and preferred stock of the trust was largely unaffected. These securities had a fixed value derived from a specified return. Most or all the gain from rising portfolio values was concentrated on the common stock of the investment trust, which, rose …show more content…

This was the victory of the New Deal. It took assault on big businesses, and leaders took to speeches on the virtues of the free enterprise system. Following the crash, the economy weakened, production of industrial products had outrun consumer and investment demand for them, the most likely reason is that business concerns misjudged the prospective increase in demand and acquired larger inventories than they later found they needed. The rich began to sustain their spending A large and increasing investment in capital goods was a principal device by which the profits were being spent. The effect of insufficient investment- investment that failed to keep pace with the steady increase in profits- could be falling total demand reflected in turn in falling orders and output. There were higher interest rates, a weak agriculture industry, a bad distribution of income, a bad corporate structure, a bad banking system, a fall in export, and a poor state of economic

Get Access