preview

Jack London's To Build A Fire

Good Essays

To Build a Fire In “To Build a Fire,” Jack London presents the story of a man against nature as he tries to survive in the harsh winter of the Yukon in the early 1900’s. He begins a nine-hour hike through, temperatures as low as -75 degrees Fahrenheit, and he plans to meet up with friends in the area. With him is a local husky, with whom he has little companionship. The narrator builds a fire to warm himself. However, as the fire starts to reach a good warming point, snow falls and douses the fire. Finally realizing that things are getting drastic, the man starts running for the camp in desperation, with hopes of warming his body and possibly getting help. Eventually though he falls from exhaustion. While on the ground, he falls asleep and …show more content…

the narrator not only tells us what the man is thinking, but contrasts it with what the dog is thinking, like in the following quote: "[The dog] knew that it was no time for traveling. Its instinct told it a truer tale than was told by the man's judgment"(London). Also, London shows its omniscience by actually stepping in and judging the man pretty harshly. It's not as bad as what you sometimes find in high school hallways, but still pretty judgmental. We get a clear idea of this in paragraph three, where the narrator tells us that "The trouble with [the man] was that he was without imagination. He was quick and alert in the things of life, but only in the things, and not in the significance" …show more content…

They would argue that he was capable of bearing the cold (until he gets wet, that is), and capable of building a fire. Additionally, the story implies that the man is not just some spoiled person, and that previously he has some experience with nature, just not to this extent. Additionally, even in times of peril, the man tends to stay relatively calm—until he realizes that his attempts at making a fire, and thus his survival, are futile. The counter of this is simply to look at the conflicts mentioned. Had the man followed the Old-Timer’s advice, he would not have had to face the perils thrown at him. He would have had a hiking companion, or better yet could have avoided traveling such distance in the cold. In fact, the man himself even realizes this late in the story, as he is nearing death. If the man had only realized the danger of his overconfidence, he may have survived. Additionally, London shows readers through the husky that the man’s lack of survival instincts is a detriment, whereas the husky survives simply by having these survival instincts. The man’s lack of survival instinct and his overconfidence lead to his

Get Access