Judge Neil Gorsuch Analysis

Gorsuch is a person who adheres strictly to a text, also known as a textualist. He supports the legal philosophy of “originalism,” which was made popular by the late Justice Antonin Scalia, whom Gorsuch would replace on the court. Originalism embraces the idea that the constitution

Instead of sticking to a strict constructivist approach, the court as a majority was willing to identify new rights in the constitution and agreed to hear cases on hotly debated social issues such as abortion, gay rights, affirmative action, and the death penalty, which conservatives thought should be decided by Congress and state

There are two major factors that affect the confirmation process of a president’s nominees; one is party affiliation. Party affiliation is very important when the Senate is confirming a nominee, because Senate confirms nominees by a ⅔ vote. This could be very crucial to the president and his or her nominee, because if the majority of the Senate is part of the opposing party, this becomes difficult for the president to get his nominee confirmed. The second political factor is qualification to become a judge or justice. The Senate does not want an unqualified judge who does not know what he or she is doing. It is important to the Senate to approve someone who has experience in the judicial field than someone who has no experience at all. The

There is an open seat in the supreme court. Since the death of justice Antonin Scalia in February 2016, President Barack Obama has attempted to appoint judge Merrick Garland to fill this vacancy. However, the currently Republican U.S. Senate has refused to act on the nomination. This is not the first time the Senate has disagreed with the president's choice of nominee. The Senate confirms just around eighty percent of the president's nominations. There is a strong rationale behind this two-tiered appointment system. Seats in the Supreme Court are extremely important positions to hold; the Supreme Court has the role of interpreting the text of the Constitution and using that interpretation

Over the course of the last eight years, the senate became hyper partisan due to unprecedented obstruction and filibuster. Republicans overused filibuster, resulting in the difficulty of Obama appointing any new persons. This is when Democrats brought the nuclear option before the senate. As this occurred, Senator Mitch McConnell stated, “I say to my friends on the other side of the aisle, you’ll regret this. And you may regret this a lot sooner than you think” (Berman). Inadvertently, Mitch McConnell foreshadowed the future political events. McConnell is a Republican, transparently showing his feelings about the decisions made by the—at the time—majority. Contradicting McConnell’s statement, Senator John McCain expresses that, “This is a body blow to the institution, and I think we’re on a slippery slope.” Recalling past confirmation wars, McCain cannot simply agree with the idea relying completely on majority votes because of the controversy; however, he did follow suit with voting likewise other Republican senates (Kane). Even with disagreements, the Republican party as a whole still manages to shut down the Democratic

Associate Justice Antonin Scalia was sworn into the Supreme Court on September 26, 1986 and was nominated by President Ronald Reagan. He took the place of Associate Justice William H. Renquist when Renquist was sworn in as Chief Justice. Justice Antonin Scalias' political affiliation is Republican. Justice Antonin started his career as a commercial lawyer for a brief period. He then taught Law at The University of Virginia. After about 4 years of teaching he went into government service starting under President Nixon and then President Ford. During President Carters reign, Justice Antonin left government service to go back to teaching law. He went back into government service under President Reagans administration and was appointed to the U.S. Court of Appeals for Washington D.C. Justice Antonin Scalia attended Georgetown University and graduated as the Valedictorian of his class. He then went on to attend and graduate from Harvard Law School. He is married and had nine children.

Tushnet’s book helps teach why the Supreme Court has ruled the way it has. In 2015, Obergefell v. Hodges legalized homosexual marriage, this would not have been possible 30 years ago. Tushnet describes this in his book, the Supreme Court doesn’t always go with whether the subject is constitutional or not, public opinion, and whoever is president at the time, determines mostly how the court rules on most decisions. In many Supreme Court cases, cases pass or fail due to a 5-4 vote, this further helps Tushnet’s case that The Court Justices hold their own personal political agendas.

How do I feel about the Supreme Court being more conservative now that Gorsuch is sworn in? Well, I am tremendously pleased! In our Supreme Court, we now have five conservatives and four liberals, majority being the conservatives. With more conservatives we should have less taxes, less government control, and essentially, a return to our original constitution. Liberals think that Americans are not clever enough to know what's good for them, they believe that they should control everything, but now that there are more conservatives, we, the people, have more power.

Our source in the White House indicates Obama will nominate Judge Faith Jenkins to the Supreme Court replacing Associate Justice Antonin Scalia who died February 13, 2016.

Previously, Minority Leader Harry Reid (D-Nev.) vowed to jam committee meetings until the Republican Party would move forward forward with Supreme Court nominee Merrick Garland. Both the Republicans and Democrats have been stuck in a giant quagmire regarding Obama's nomination of Merrick Garland. The Republicans are adamantly opposed to newcomer Merrick Garland. The Democrats generally support Garland, however, some believe that he is too moderate on issues such as gun control. In order to break the stalemate, Reid pledged to seize committee meetings -- forcing the Republicans to move forward with Garland.

In a close 5-4 vote, newly appointed Justice Neil Gorsuch voted to reject Lee’s request along with the four other conservative justices.

In SCOTUS Gorsuch's very decision, he uphold state-sanctioned murder. Gorsuch was conformed for SCOTUS only after Mitch McConnell purposely refused give Merrill Garrick a senate

The two Justics on the Supreme Court are John G. Roberts, Jr. and Ruth Bader Ginsburg. John G. Roberts, Jr. was appointed on 29 September 2005 by president bush at an age of 50. He is a republican, his confirmation vote was by voice and his ideologies are conservative. On the other hand, President Bill Clinton appointed Ruth Bader Ginsburg on 5 August 1993 at an age of 60. She is a democrat and her ideology is liberal although she would vote with conservatives when necessary. Her confirmation vote was decisive since it was by landslide.

President Trump named the Colorado appeals court judge on Tuesday to replace the late Antonin Scalia.

During Justice Sonia Sotomayor nomination interrogative, she stated that, her background will never influence her judgement, but there are times where she has had consideration for his party since the law requires different results. She holdup herself on her earlier controversial statement that “wise Latino woman” saying that she was making a joke on the comment by O’Connor that a wise man and a wise woman would make the same judgment. With her experience with the liberal associates in high court, she was going to be a great team player. However, I believe the ideological and civic opinion can play a big role in the result of a case is affected by the judge of Supreme. Even though, liberal and conservative elective alliances on the court