preview

Julius Caesar Rhetorical Analysis Essay

Satisfactory Essays

In The Tragedy of Julius Caesar, Mark Antony was known to be a noble man, but soon after he conveyed the speech to the plebians it all changed from there. Brutus and the conspirators killed Caesar because they felt if Caesar stayed leader he would bring Rome to a down fall. During Caesar’s funeral, Brutus made a mistake of letting Mark Antony speak at Caesar’s funeral. At this point, his mistake allowed Antony to turn on him and the conspirators and get the plebeians to turn on the conspirators. Mark Antony uses the word ¨honorable¨, the will, and the body of Caesar as a way to persuade the plebeians to turn against the conspirators. Mark Antony repeatedly uses the word ¨honorable¨ in his speech as a persuasive device to get the plebeians to turn on the conspirators. Antony stated in his speech ¨Yet Brutus says he was ambitious; And Brutus is an honourable man.¨ Antony using irony to attempt to portray Brutus as selfish and dishonest. He continues to repeatedly use the word honourable, for instance when he says ¨I should do Brutus wrong, and Cassius wrong, Who, you all know, are honourable men.¨ This is another example of verbal irony he uses. He’s claiming he should get back at Brutus and Cassius for what they’ve done to Caesar, but then he throws in ¨honourable¨ which is the opposite …show more content…

He uses Caesar’s body as another example of a persuasive device. Such as in his speech he says ¨Here wast thou bayed, brave hart.¨ In other words Antony’s saying Caesar was like a deer being killed by his hunters (murders). Furthermore Antony goes onto state ¨O world, thou wast the forest to this hart,And this indeed, O world, the heart of thee.¨ Antony’s explaining that the world Caesar lived in was like the woods to a deer, and that Julius Caesar loved that world. All in all Caesar loved his people and his world but it was taken away from him when he was hunted down by the

Get Access