on June 12, 1959 shortly after 7:00 p.m., he was taken into custody. At about 2:30 a.m. on June 13, he was charged with first degree murder under the Juvenile Detention Act since he was only 14. After the conviction, he spent four months in the shadows until his death sentence was commuted to life imprisonment. Paroled in 1969, Steven disappeared in a southern Ontario city.
USELESS JUVENILE INCARCERATION SYSTEM 2A Broken Juvenile Detention SystemThe juvenile detention system is broken because all troubled teens should be treated for instead of punished, rising recidivism rates are caused by punishment itself. The youth spends a lot of time that could be spent in a classroom behind bars. This issue is like a butterfly effect affecting society. The youth should be getting treated instead of being punished, serving punishment is the root of the problem. Justice cannot be served with racism floating throughout the air, racism pollutes the verdict.First off, wasted time is a wasted effort and time is something that can’t be received back.Juveniles are humans and have minds, actions, and feelings like every human being, it has to be kept in mind that control can’t be kept over everyone. Think about owning a restaurant, logically an owner won’t want to remain open in business if work is slow, get very little customers, receive bad reviews, use tools in an unsafe manner endangering people around you. Well I wouldsay a detention facility is very similar. If it’s not bringing any benefit to the youth or their families, then what is the purpose of having these facilities as a form of punishment? Facts are provided based off some of these facilities major flaws. “Specifically, the report will show that these facilities are frequently: (1) dangerous, (2) ineffective, (3) unnecessary, (4) obsolete, (5) wasteful, and (6) inadequate. A subsequent chapter addresses the question of public safety,finding that states where juvenile confinement was sharply reduced in recent years experienced more favorable trends in juvenile crime than jurisdictions which maintained or increased their correctional facility populations....” (Mendel, 2013). Logically, based on the results provided it issafe to say that not confining juveniles will show a positive outcome. The juvenile crime rates are favorably lower for cities and help maintain correctional facility population to a norm. Solid
I do not think there is anything to help equip juveniles deal with the issues getting transferred to an adult prison. While in juvenile detention the youths are house with 53 other young kids sentenced as adults. Once the prisoner turns 18 they get transferred to the adult block where now there are 200 hundred other inmates and also bucking with another cell mate. Also it seems like In the documentary the kids were pushed to get and finish getting their G.E.D. while in jail. I don’t think there would be the same type of encouragement in adult prison. Last is while serving time in juvenile detention you was house with similar aged people and for the most part was there to do their time without trouble. Didn’t have any hardened criminals
Juveniles in solitary confinement are away from all human contact and isolated for a long period of time. These juveniles in confinement are isolated from others for hours, days, and weeks. When a juvenile violates a prison regulation they must be punished with solitary confinement. The corrections department believe that solitary confinement is necessary for juveniles because is prevents them from fighting with others and protects them from harming themselves. The problem with teenagers in solitary confinement is many of them are diagnosed with mental health problems. Another problem, are these teenagers have suicidal thoughts because they are locked up in a small room where they are alone for hours or days and no communication.
Alternatives to secure detention and confinement for juveniles are approaches that help avoid juveniles from being detained in a secure detention facility or a confinement facility. Secure detention facilities hold juveniles who are entering into the juvenile justice system generally for two specific reasons. Those reasons are to ensure the juvenile will be in attendance for all court hearings and for the safeguard of the community from future crimes. Confinement facilities house juveniles that have been adjudicated and assigned to the custody of correctional facilities. Secure detention and confinement of juveniles tend to do more harm than good. Research has shown that secure detention and confinement facilities have a negative effect on
San Jose Police Chief, Bill Landsdowne, stated that, “[l]ocking up kids is the easiest way. But once they get in the juvenile justice system, it’s very hard to get them out” (Holman & Ziedenberg, date). Detaining youth, in particular non-violent offenders, has more of a negative, long-term impact on youth as well as the community. With the inception of the Juvenile Detention Alternatives Initiative, the use of retribution is being pushed aside for more restorative and rehabilitation efforts. States that have embraced this initiative are finding that not only are the numbers of youth being detained decreasing but that alternatives to detention are providing opportunity for juveniles to become productive members of the community. All this effort without increasing risk to the community and safety issues. More importantly this initiative works in addressing the underlying issues causing delinquent behavior.
The age requirement for a youth to enter inside a secure facility is between the age of 5 and 21. A youth that is above the age of 16 and does not have superior court chargers and committed to the state the youth can be housed at a juvenile detention to they are 21 years of age. If the youth is a superior court youth and has turned 17 the youth will be transfer to the county jail where they committed their offense. Or they will be transferred to the Department of Corrections if they have been given their time. In some cases they judge may allow the youth to stay inside a juvenile detention while the youth is on trial even if the youth has turned 17. It must be a court order.
Across the United States, the juvenile justice system’s courts and corrections are scattered with ineffective strategies that are formed which instead increases crime, the nation’s youth are endangered and the future of this country are damaged, billions of taxpayer dollars are put down the drain, and most importantly our mission for equal justice under the law is compromised. Over the past couple of decades, our understanding of how to take on delinquency has expanded in many different forms such as its policy work. But how effective are these works? Amongst all kinds of policy that affect exposed families and their children, Juvenile Justice is atop the list, suffering division in regards to what is the best form of action versus common action. In other words it is between what we as people know works and what the system most often do that aren’t as successful. Our system relies heavily on incarceration and detention, we should instead focus our resources into proven strategies that are cost efficient, increase our public safety, and also look to increase the success of youth that become involved with the juvenile courts. Immediate attention should be enforced and required in combating abuse in juvenile facilities as well as reducing racial disparities.
Under what circumstances can a juvenile be held in detention prior to trial? There are four circumstances that hold a juvenile in detention which are lack of parental care, for juvenile protection or society protection, to make sure the juvenile attends his hearing, how serious the offense is, and juvenile prior
Transfers decision were based on the severity of the offense. Also, transfers decision were made by invidually judge who weighed out if this young offender will endanger the public safety. Also, in some states, it was left to the prosecutors or by the legislators who decided whether to try a juvenile as adult. Another method to transfer juveniles to adult court was the judicial waiver, which is the most transfer method. About twenty-five percent of juvenile offenders are prosecuted in adult court. Juveniles tried as adult can be safety to the community, because juveniles prosecuted as adult had a higher rates of rearrests for serious felony such as robbery or assault. The negative consequences of youths being tried as an adult, they are expose
Over the past 20 years the Juvenile Detention Alternatives Initiative (JDAI) purpose has been supporting the Annie E Casey Foundation’s vision that all adolescents involved in the juvenile justice system have the opportunities to develop into healthy, productive adults. The Juvenile Detention Alternatives Initiative (JDAI) is a juvenile detention reform, that has safely reduced reliance on secure detention. The JDAI purpose is to promote changes to policies, practices and promote programs that will decrease the number of adolescents and racial disparities or bias, that are unnecessarily detained, to basically improve the juvenile system overall (Juvenile Detention Alternative Initiative. (n.d.).
As I sit down and talk to my five brothers, I always hear different stories from when they were in prison or in jail. Out of my five brothers, three of them have been in prison. Actually, one of them is still sitting in the Ely State Prison. I never knew how hard it was to sit in prison and do time for years. Until I started listening to the stories my brothers came home to tell.
Virginia, I agree that it is wonderful how the Juvenile Detention Alternative Initiative has helped the juveniles. Although the admission to the detention has reduced to 50%, because of this percentage a juvenile is less likely to complete high school and we not be able to find employment. However, I am impressed with the HOMEBOY Industries in how they implement programs to ex-gang members which initially gives them a second chance. Nevertheless, this organization focus in the area that is of great importance such as, counseling, education, job training. Therefore I believe that this program should be executed in our major large city to assist ex-gang members in becoming a productive citizen. Thanks for giving your observation about this topic.
Prisons are designed to house people who have broken the law and to remove them from free society. Inmates are imprisoned for a set period of time and have very limited freedoms during their incarceration. While every prison serves the same basic purpose, there are many different types of prisons.
According to www.ojjdp.gov, over one million juveniles (under age 18) were arrested. The crimes that were committed range from rape, assault, robbery, arson, and more. In most states, at the age of sixteen, youth are charged as an adult. The sentence that is given to a juvenile determines how the rest his or her life will go. Instead of incarcerating the youth, society should focus on understanding the facts of youth incarceration and why children act out in the first place, and then communities should move on to providing better options that will help children become better citizens rather than being menaces to society.
The juvenile court is different from the adult court in that juveniles are not adjudicated guilty. THe thought that the female juvenile can use her experiences as manipulation in a court that is meant to evaluate why juveniles are displaying behavior is sexist. Male juveniles experiences are treated as facts that show risk factors, and the female juveniles experiences should be treated