preview

Karrie J. Koesel's Religious Freedom And Restriction In China

Decent Essays

Mahatma Gandhi once said, "Freedom is not worth having if it does not include the freedom to make mistakes." If this were true, freedom would lose its importance. It must be remembered, freedom's importance comes from its virtue, because true freedom and virtue go hand in hand. When people do whatever they want without consequences, it takes away from the rights of others Americans, therefore, losing its virtue and importance. If individuals were free to make wrong decisions, how much people would really be free? True freedom derives from the virtues and morals of America, which is the reason why it is important to every American. True freedom is important because of its morals, protections, religious freedom, universality, and strong work …show more content…

With this in mind, true freedom does not control religion or free expression of thought. This is not so in other countries, such as China, since they do not have freedom to religion. In 2014, author and associate professor Karrie J. Koesel Ph.d wrote her article, "Religious Freedom and Restriction in China", to show how China's government is starting to control socialistically and its effects on its citizen's religious freedom. Koesel's main point was that even with China seemingly being for religious freedom, they still regulate religion and oppress anyone that doesn't practice what is allowed. First thing she pointed out was that China has tight controls over the government, anyone who critics the government, and any media within China as well as its information. Nevertheless, she explains that China makes themselves seem as a religiously tolerant and free nation. However, this is not true, and the author discusses how they "recognize only five official faiths" and make "theological restrictions" (Koesel). This means that any religious group outside of the official religions and any belief outside of their restrictions is liable to oppression from the government. Koesel's concluding point is that China's restrictions on religion does not stop religious growth but, in fact, increases it. In other words, in China, even though they seem to be for religious freedom, …show more content…

In 1963, thirty-fifth President of the United States, John F. Kennedy, made this point in his speech, "Address on Civil Rights", to address a situation of two black boys who needed guards to protect them in their University. Kennedy's main point was that the discrimination on African Americans was no longer a political issue but a moral one. In light of this, he called for Americans to think over the incident and explained that all men are created equal and should be free. In addition, the author goes on to say that all Americans, even those of color, should enjoy the same rights as any American and be treated just as fair. Furthermore, the African American was not given the same rights or treatment; they were not free. He calls upon the issue in a moral light and claims that the nation will not be "fully free until all its citizens are free" (Kennedy). To explain, his point was that they cannot call this nation the land of the free if they excluded people based on skin color. Given these points, Kennedy called for action to make the country a place of equal freedom, as well as point out all he had done to desegregate. He concluded by asking for the support of every citizen in making the country a place of freedom for everyone. Americans can see the change in freedom, from what is was then to what it is now. When Kennedy made this speech, America did not quite have true freedom. It lacked universality. "One

Get Access