Kate Daley Friends With Benefits Summary

The author has many weaknesses and strengths. As said before, the author lacks the differing of other viewpoints and also more facts. Although, the author does a great job of of clarifying her passion for the subject and making it clear that this is an emotional subject on her part. She provides the right information to prove that she is confident in this subject, but not enough information to prove that other people have a different viewpoint on the subject.

Scott Brown establishes a humorous tone, focuses on specific diction and language, and utilizes figurative language to develop his argument that modern day social networking with Facebook in particular drives the collection of meaningless friendships and prevents people from undergoing the natural process of letting go of friends. Brown appeals to his audience through his use of tone. Right at the beginning of the essay, he casually asks, “Hey, want to be my friend?” (par 1).

In his article, “Is Facebook Making Us Lonely?” Stephen Marche argues that Facebook is the vital cause for loneliness and is luring people away from social capital. According to Marche, social networking isolates individuals and creates distance, mostly amongst family members. For some, it is not only isolation but rather social loneliness. The author claims that health can also be effected by loneliness. Nowadays, due to very little verbal person to person communication, he writes that people have never been so separated from one another because of social media. Facebook users, Marche argues, have an addiction to profoundly visit their account constantly leading to the feeling of loneliness and in most cases depression. The author claims that social networking, instead of demolishing isolation, is unknowingly spreading it. Ultimately, However, Stephen’s argument fails to convince due to his abundant false assumptions and the articles confusing organization.

However, with the expansion of social media, many argue that the word “friend” has lost its meaning. Social media “friends” may, in reality, just be acquaintances added to social media lists order to appear popular. Even as many Americans spend time and energy developing

Facebook has become just another way of provoking emotions without talking to someone. When you read the article, you laugh because of the examples she uses. Like when she talks about how one of her friends said she is “In a relationship with Chinese food.” We have all seen that, we might even be those people. So, you feel happy because you can relate to her at that moment. How many of us have seen someone give a “soliloquy” to people that we don’t even know? We can all relate to the feeling of giving a speech over Facebook because we are behind a screen and we do not think that people are reading it. But she also made you feel guilty when she tells you that we have changed the idea of interpersonal relationships. How many of our “Facebook friends” are really our friends?

Anhelina Androshchuk Professor Benavides English 103 Rhetoric Analysis 2/13/17 Likeaholic Social Media the worst yet the greatest invention created in the 21th century. As of today, one of these social networking sites is Facebook, which lists as the biggest social networking site with 1. 23 billion users every single day (Newsroom). It allows people to view news, videos, and pictures and sent messages to families and friends in other states and countries. It opens the world of possibilities for people of different ages, cultures, and values. Tragically, people have become addicted to it, they eat and sleep with it.

Therefore, it was easy to drift off in boredom and lose the main idea of her article. In my opinion, Kolbert made the bulk of her article empirical evidence and slid her personal opinions in between sentence so that it could pass as factual. Therefore, although Kolbert’s article is flawless in structure, her rhetoric is lacking due to the overuse of empirical

With 50% of users logging on to Facebook everyday and more than 35 million users updating their status’s everyday (Facebook a, 2010), it posses the question what effect are social networking sites, mainly Facebook, having on our friendships? Are we extending our social networking and enriching them? Or are the effects of the ease and accessibility of a ‘friend’ demeaning our relationships?

Bonanno continues by discussing some of the reasons social media has such a substantial impact on relationships: “it allows the luxury of easily keeping in touch”, “it can help combat feelings of loneliness”, “it allows us to keep tangible markers of times and places, archived for us, and available for all to see, but no intimate; and lastly, it just is not a real connection as it would be face to face. Viable solutions to the problem, Bonanno suggests, maintaining and real life relationship with individuals rather than just online and also enabling balance into

The author illustrates in her blog the power and impact Facebook had on the population by convincing to be “a place of human connectivity,” but

Kate Dailey began her essay, Friends With Benefits: Do Facebook Friends Provide the Same Support as Those In Real Life? by telling us about how her friend lost her son and shared it on Facebook for support. Kate then wondered if Facebook friends showed the same support as real friends. Kate did research involving information from Professors and Facebook users.

In the article “Faux Friendship” written by William Deresiewicz he talks about how Social Network sites like Facebook, Twitter and other social media are changing the meaning of friendship. Numerous friends pop up into our online sites however we are lonely. We talk constantly yet we don’t look into their eyes but letters on a screen. We are fading the relationship and value of the word friend in our society. Those called friends on social sites have spun into contacts, friends who know other friends and people we would like to be friends with.The way we view each other today is different than from the past. In the historical times a friend was viewed in a more personal, affectionate, earned bond, trustworthy perspectivewe had classical, romantic

Social media such as Facebook, Twitter, MySpace, Instagram, and Flicker was invented to keep us in touch and keep us closer to our family and friends. But according to How Facebook ruins Friendships “we took our friendship online” (Bernstein). First we began communicating more by email than by phone and then switched to instant messaging or texting. By joining social Medias online

At first, I agreed with Stephen Marche, author of “Is Facebook Making Us Lonely?”, but after doing some of my own research I would like to retract my original position. We cannot blame technology for our own human condition. However Stephen Marche begs to differ. “At the forefront of all this unexpectedly lonely interactivity is Facebook, with 845 million users and $3.7 billion in revenue last year” (Marche). Stephen Marche believes Facebook is making us lonely because it is changing the dynamics of traditional friendships (Marche). He also blames Facebook for the rise in human isolation. From 1950 to 2010 a 17 percent increase in households of one were reported (Marche). Does Marche not realize that many happy Americans

Social media improves the way people communicate with others. It allows them to meet new people. At the click of a button, millions of strangers all over the world who would have never met otherwise are able to connect with each other. Many people believe that internet friends are not as valuable as real life friendships. However with websites like “skype” and instant messaging sites, long distance friendships can be as intimate as real life friendships because social media allows friends to see each other face to face and spend quality time together whenever they want to. Because of this, internet friendships should no longer be considered taboo and should be seen as normal human relationships, “It’s entirely possible to have hundreds of