preview

Lack Of Adequate Discharge Planning For Incarcerated Adults With Serious Mental Illness

Decent Essays

In the United States, over the past 200 years, the practice of federal and state governmental treatment and geographical disposition of the seriously mentally ill has seemed cyclical. Essentially, persons with serious mental illness went from community-living to incarceration to hospitalization to community-living and finally back to incarceration (Matjekowski, Draine, Solomon & Salzer, 2011, Ostermann & Matjekowski, 2014 & Raphael & Stoll, 2013). Currently, the United States has a federal mandate that all incarcerated persons with mental illness have access to at least basic mental health care. However, there is no such policy for these same persons once discharged (Aufderheide & Brown, 2005, Coffey, 2012 & Maloney, Ward & Jackson, 2003). The following provides an overview of the process of institutionalization of adults with serious mental illness, a description of the population, the current treatments available, and the current concern surrounding the lack of adequate discharge planning for incarcerated adults with serious mental illness.
The Institutionalization of Adults with Serious Mental Illness In the 1800s, asylums were built as a means to house the seriously mentally ill, often taking persons from their homes and families to die alone in often deplorable and inhumane conditions. The process of “locking up” persons who were deemed seriously mentally ill continued until the 1950s after the public demand for humane treatment towards the seriously mentally ill

Get Access