Larceny: A Case Study

In order to determine and validate the grade of the offense as grand larceny, the value of the bobblehead must at least be the value of the statutory amount stated in the Virginia Code §18.2-95(ii). The burden of the Commonwealth is to prove that the object in question satisfies this requisite value beyond a reasonable doubt. Parker, 489 S.E.2d at 482. The object of larceny meets the statutory amount required for a charge of grand larceny if the fair market value of the object in question, “not the entire property for which it is a part,” is equal to or greater than $200 at the time and place of the theft; however, the opinion testimony of the owner of the stolen goods and the original purchase price from a reasonable time prior, may be admissible, considering “due allowance for elements of depreciation.” See Robinson v. Commonwealth, 516 S.E.2d 475, 476 (Va. 1999); Parker, 489 S.E.2d at 482, 484, 483; Lester v. Commonwealth, 518 S.E.2d 318, 323, 322 (Va. Ct. App. 1999)

Nixon believed that Johnson focused too much on the social causes and not enough on punishment of those who committed crimes believing that men should be held accountable for their actions. He was urged to place this war on crime on the same plane as any crisis fought in the

On Thursday, June9, 2016, I responded to 3457 Hillsborough Road in reference to a trespasser call. Upon arrival I met Mr. Willie Marcus Brown an armed security guard with Dunbar. Mr. Brown stated he was at the Kroger fuel center. He exited his vehicle to purchase an item when he heard his vehicle’s door closing and witnessing a while male in the driver seat of the vehicle. The suspect was revving the engine but could not place the vehicle in the drive gear. At this point he used his spare key to unlock the vehicles door and was struck about his person several times by the suspect who was attempting to get away in the vehicle. Mr. Brown stated he managed to draw his weapon on the suspect. The suspect got out of the vehicle and ran across Hillsborough

On 10/07/2016, Kayla Winthrop contacted the Pasco Sheriff`s Office by telephone to report a Petit Theft.

On 05/11/2016, at approximately 1011 hours, I responded to 401 W Seminole Blvd Apt 5, Sanford, in reference to a disturbance and a theft. Upon my arrival, I made contact with Winford Whited (arrestee) and Mark Whited (victim).

In 2013, the frequency of Larceny-Theft (burglary) equated to 1 incident every 52 seconds (DPS).

On 02-18-16 at 0857 hours, Officer Cass #2067 and I responded to 1322 Sunset Avenue for a vehicle burglary investigation. Upon our arrival we met with Victim Annie Lois Jordan who told us the following information in summary:

Michael Stanley’s criminal conviction is talked about in his deposition and also in the deposition of Debra Rekeil. Does this open door on Stanely’s character in trial?

Yes, they do seek an efficient amount of lawbreaking rather than none because then these agencies would be useless and their services would no longer be needed. Some legal activities that might do more good than harm would be murdering a serial killer. A penalty for crimes like this would be the same as a normal murder penalty. People should be fined extremely high amounts for doing something we want to prohibit because it will make them think twice about doing so due to the price.

y definition, misdemeanor theft is a crime of theft that is somewhat less serious than a felony. In other words, the object of theft is under fifty dollars in value. Before one commits an act of misdemeanor theft, there are three very important areas of life that will be affected and therefore must be considered: the individual's future, the individual's family, and the other consumers of society.

Crime Lab Director Ross Capps submitted a request to change the position title and duties of Kelly McGill-Carrol from a Forensic Scientist III to the DNA Technical Leader, also a Forensic Scientist III. Furthermore, along with this title change Director Capps has requested an increase to step 9 on the Forensic Scientist III scale, (K) from $40.14 to $41.34, with an additional step increase on McGill’s anniversary date of July 2017 to $42.58.

In summary, on 07/27/17 at 2153, Ofc. Pater #213 and I were canvassing the area for possible offenders in regards to a Robbery, which occurred at 1817 S 57th Court. The first offender was described as a white male, red shirt, brown shorts, heavy set. The second offender was described as a female black wearing a dress.

On Tuesday, September 19, 2017, I was on patrol, in full uniform, in a marked black and white Pasadena Police vehicle, Unit #17. At approximately 1313 hours, I responded to 408 E. Orange Grove Blvd, in regards to a petty theft report. Upon my arrival, I made contact with victim Aurelio Diaz and he told me the following in summary.

The term larceny is believed to originate from the Anglo-French word Larecin, which means theft, and its first known use was in the mid 15th century. The definition, as defined by Merriam-Webster’s Dictionary, is “the unlawful taking of personal property with intent to deprive the rightful owner of it permanently.”

Larceny is defined as the wrongful taking and carrying away of the personal goods of another from his or her possession with intent to convert them to the takers own use. To bluntly say it, larceny is stealing from others. No matter what the motives or reasons behind stealing are, it is still wrong. I imagine there is a multitude of motives for someone to convince himself or herself that it is worth the risk to steal something. Some other people might also not have the conscience to feel wrong for stealing. A large part of this is because people do not understand who or what they are harming when they steal. It is very common to become self-indulged and only worry about your problems. Even after being caught someone might only feel