The Film to be shown for Future Generations If Leon Cooper were to watch the film The Thin Red Line, he might actually be moved to tears at how closely accurate the war was portrayed. The film shows perfectly the destruction of the islands that once were inhabited by peaceful locals into a place that is unrecognizable. Not only that, it flawlessly demonstrated the breakdown of soldiers and how they felt towards the war. Leon Cooper would relate mostly to two of the characters in how they view the war and the way they handled their situations. There were characters that Cooper hated also due to their motives and how they did not cared about the lives of the soldiers. This would have angered Cooper at how selfish the character was and not understanding …show more content…
For the character to make little of this battlefield and to use it for his own gain, would be a disgrace as a soldier. Everything from how the soldiers were portrayed in the battlefield and the environment that they were forced to be in, Leon Cooper would have approved of this film to be shown to the world to represent what went down in the battlefields,
Cooper would relate to the Private Witt and Captain Staros the most as they both seemed like the people most opposed to the gruesome war. With Private Witt, Cooper would understand his actions and not blame him for going AWOL. He would appreciate Witt’s appreciation of trying to live peacefully with the locals, and also share the feeling of devastations when Witt came back and saw how the island was nothing like when he left. Cooper could sympathize how upset Witt felt when he finally came back because that is how he felt when he came back to Tarawa
…show more content…
He probably couldn’t stand this character seeing how he is the epitome of everything Cooper is fighting against. Tall was acting as the evils in the war, besides the enemies. Cooper would have thought how Tall symbolizes how the US government is. He does not care for the people and soldiers but only for the glory of beating the enemies not caring about the loss. He haphazardly gave orders to send men to their deaths without carefully analyzing the seriousness of the predicament that they are in; only there to get the results. This was similar to how the U.S just sent men to battle to multiple islands without much preparation and caused many unnecessary deaths and miscalculations. They were so rushed for victory that many soldiers died in the war. The US and Tall could have handled the situation with more planning. Something that he could also compare is the fact that most of the time the two were more acting behind the scenes and were not actively in the battle. While Tall was safely at the bottom of the hill away from the bunkers, he was furious when Staros would not send his men uphill to battle when it was clearly disadvantage on their side. Similarly the U.S. just sent out more and more troops to battle while the officials are safe back in the U.S. Lastly the way that he handled with the fallen soldiers are
In Caryn James’ NYT review of the miniseries “Band of Brothers,” James states that the series manage to capture and recreate the setting of World War II with the world’s “devotion, bravery, and terror,” comparing it to films such as “Apocalypse Now” and “Saving Private Ryan.” The reviewer was able to get a grade scope of what Steven Spielberg and Tom Hanks had visualized, and how that creates an “enduring place” of war films. James does emphasize HBO’s production value, and describes this show as an “expensive” and “enormous” miniseries, and also mentions the “powerful stylistic influence” of “Saving Private
My first impression of Cooper was that he must make his decisions using utilitarianism. He fearlessly sacrifices his relationship with his family for the sake of the
There is one scene where the three flag raisers entered a crowded stadium before a football game which typified how an image of war can be so different to the reality of war. The flash photography, the cheering, the roar of the crowd all went to John Bradley’s head and he had flash backs of the fighting on Iwo Jima and the genuine heroes that he had left behind. This scene contrasts what the reality of war, were all the men are dug in and fighting for there life, and the images of war. Ira Hayes says “I know it’s a good thing, raising the money and that, ‘cause we need it. But, I can’t take them calling me a hero. All I did was try not to get shot. Some of the things I saw done, things I did, they weren’t things to be proud of, you know?” Clint Eastwood shows continuously, through his characters physiology shows how one single photo can be so different what really makes up the battle of Iwo Jima. The aim was to get war bonds; the minds of the three main characters through Clint Eastwood’s directing showed a strong insight to how the reality of a war and an image of war can be so contrasting.
The beaches were indeed covered with bodies, and the water was red with the blood of the slaughtered soldiers. The recreation of this battle by Steven Spielberg has succeeded in bringing this war, this battle in particular, out of the history books and into larger than life color on America’s movie screens. Everyone I interviewed already knew of the terrible acts of the Germans during World War II, but hey had not, however, ever really been able to comprehend the degree of loss that many families experienced. They had also never really been able to picture the battles of the soldiers themselves in quite the detail that Saving Private Ryan provided them with. This is one movie that should not be negatively reviewed because of the degree of violence. Saving Private Ryan is about a horrible war, that took place because of a madman’s craziness, and this war was an ugly thing that happened very much like this movie portrayed it. The continuous gore is difficult to watch at times, but leaves the viewer with a greater appreciation of their nation’s military, and the sacrifice of the soldiers who serve willingly.
The film showed the effects that the war had on the soldiers. As well as, the effects that nationalism had on all the soldiers in the film. For example, the only reason the soldiers went to war was in order to be able to fight for their motherland. The film is realistic because it showed how the soldiers reacted to their comrades dying, as well as, their mental breakdowns and depression in the film. The film also showed a sense of realism by having soldiers give up hope on getting better in the hospital care they have been put into.
I read the section about the battles that took place during WWII. It brought to my minds that in real life. There are more important things during a war than finding a private Ryan. War is a huge event and the little things like finding a person to keep the family name going is too small to include in war history. This is what separates the movies from the real life. Another difference is they don't show the actual planning it takes to start an attack or the inelegance that is needed to set up the perfect defense barrier to prevent the advancement of the enemy soldiers. A real battle can last days, weeks, months, or years, compared to movie war that lasts not even a day and has one guy or one platoon take on the entire other side. The casualties of real war is tremendous, rather than movies where you see almost the same characters in the whole movie accomplishing some of the most intense tasks with only one or two dying. Also, in movie war you don't see the other side's horror. You think all the opponents are bad horrible people that deserve to die, when they are just soldiers doing their job and the only reason we are fighting them is because of a bad leader or government. So in the movies every enemy deserves to die and should be shown no mercy, but the actual thing about that is that the enemy is just like any other soldier. And furthermore when the good guys lose a battle in a
During the movie you start to realise that none of the soldiers use their first names, all their last names and nicknames. This shows the close bond they hav with each other. The film also shows a few burials
“Hello mother, father, this is your Louie talking. This will be the first time in two years that you’ve heard my voice. I am now interned at a Tokyo prisoner of war camp and I’m being treated as well as can be expected under wartime conditions.” As a viewer we can see the look of pure disgust and longing upon Louie’s face. It was evident that he wasn’t eager to read what was prepared for him as it depicted a false perception of what his wartime conditions were truly like. The fact that he had to make it seem like he was well when in fact he was anything but. I am now able to understand that what those in society often herd about their captured soldiers was quite often incorrect. The enemy wanted to portray an image that hid the true conditions and circumstances the American soldiers were subject to. I not only found this film inspiring as it showed the resilience American soldiers had whilst confined in the prisoner of war camps but also found it interesting as it showed the truths of war so vividly in way that could never be achieved through the use of written words. As a result of this film I am able to see how much we owe these men for our freedom, we were never truly able to appreciate the sacrifice made by those men and women until viewing this incredible film. They went through so much to ensure the freedom of many generations to come and if it wasn’t for these men who knows what our lives would be like today.
When people think of war what comes to mind is death, torture, and destruction. War instills fear since everyone dreads involvement in the ordeal (Mazlish 10). The experience of war leaves people with physical and psychological scars. Tim Obrien in “The Things they Carried” brings to light the tribulations faced by the soldiers in their quest to restore peace. He asserts, ‘war is hell (Brien 8).’This is an exhilarating story that brings to light the fact that, despite their participation in the war, soldiers are still human. Stanley Kubrick echoes Obrien’s sentiments in his award winning film the Full Metal Jacket. Both highlight the ugly truths of war as full of cruelties and absurdities. The experience of war for the soldiers shows that they are still human with feelings and emotions (Mazlish 11). For some, their emotions grow stronger while others undergo mental anguish and breakdowns, but whatever the case nobody is ever the same again.
This is just one example of the calamitous effects of American-sponsored regime change operations. Driven by American exceptionalism, America believed that it’s involvement and invasion in other countries would be beneficial to American security. The United States embraced regime change because it pushed for American government to influence the entire world. President bush asserted that American government is “right and true for every person in every society.” It rests on the belief that Western-style democracy is the natural state of all nations and that all will embrace it once the United States removes artificial
To convey the terrible truth that the Allies lost 10,000 men on June 6th, the director had to recreate the gruesome blood soaked waters and beaches and the piles of dead and dying soldiers. The scene when Miller’s men go rummaging through the huge pile of dog tags is surreal.
The film showed me a lot about the horrors of the war. It was a very hard and long war.
“The effective war film is often the one in which the action begins after the war, when there is nothing but ruins and desolation everywhere…”
While watching this film you may find yourself experiencing some of the same emotions as the characters in the film this allows you to be in the movie letting you be a part of an important event in our history. This is what makes the film so unique. Its full of different scenarios that keep you wondering what is going to happen next. I think that this film is a very close representation of what WWII was really like.
Spielberg’s Saving Private Ryan has been credited as being the most accurate war recreation film in history. It is the winner of five Academy Awards including Best Director for Steven Spielberg. Like Jaws, the opening scene has perfect equilibrium, calm at both the beginning and the end. Another thing this opening scene has in common with Jaws is the under water camera, and there are also shots from the killer’s point of view – in this case, the shooters’. In addition to this, they both end with calm water; a common theme in Spielberg’s openings. At the beginning of the scene, there is a long shot of a war cemetery; this drives home the seriousness of the war and just how many people died as it is very easy to forget the sheer number of people who were murdered during the war. The extreme close up on the eye of an old Captain Miller (Tom Hanks) gives the audience a feeling of connection with the character and lets them know he is going to have an important role within the film. During the fight scene the camera angles are wild movements and a handheld camera is used to give the effect of a person running as though it is from one of the soldiers’ point of view as this is likely to be something like what they would have seen and experienced. There are many visual effects such as one boat being set on fire with the soldiers still