preview

Lesson Before Dying Themes

Decent Essays

Based in the late 1940s in Louisiana, Ernest Gaines’ A Lesson Before Dying is an intriguingly complex novel that explores numerous themes of immense historic value. However, it is undeniable that the novel’s back-bone is structured by one, all-pervasive theme: that racism is a detriment to any society. It is also successful at conveying that in an ignorant society where racism thrives, demoralization against coloured people will always be rampant. Gaines’ extensive use of setting highly develops the theme for the reader, ultimately making this novel an extremely powerful thought provoking piece of literature. Gaines links the immediate surroundings aspect of setting with segregation to further develop his theme. In a racist society dominated …show more content…

He uses Jefferson, an uneducated African-American wrongfully convicted for murder, to demonstrate this. Jefferson’s court appointed attorney attempts to defend him by stating that he was a “thing to hold the handle of a plow, a thing to load your bales of cotton, a thing to dig your ditches, to chop your wood, to pull your corn” (8). His attorney then further degrades his level of competence and intelligence by stating that he “[w]ould just as soon put a hog in the electric chair as this” (8). Despite his attorney’s efforts, however, “he had been found guilty of the charges brought against him” and had been sentenced to “[d]eath by electrocution” (9). Gaines’ courtroom setting highly relates to the extremely unfair criminal convictions and subjections coloured people faced through Caucasian dominated juries and judges. This type of social setting not only created an unfair situation, but one which lacked diversity and morality. For example, if a coloured individual was accused of some crime, he or she would undoubtedly be found guilty and given the harshest penalty possible as they were being judged by individuals who viewed them as hogs—a creature of filth and stupidity. And worse, in a courtroom in excess of white jurors, lawyers, and judges, it is inevitable that anything law-abiding would be considered right as they were manipulators, and so they could be no …show more content…

He uses Grant, a teacher at a coloured school in an extremely segregated society in Louisiana, to do this. Grant questions his role in society and contemplates whether he “should act like the teacher that [he] was, or like the nigger [he] was supposed to be” (47). It is important to note that the school he taught at was deprived of the necessary resources to run a class— chalk, textbooks, and wood were all too expensive. In an attempt to take action, Grant tells Dr. Joseph, the school’s superintendent, that he does not “have all the books [he needs]” and that “[he needs] more paper to write on, more chalk for the blackboards [,] more pencils [and] a bigger heater” (57). In an attempt to dodge the issue at hand, Joseph blatantly lies and says that “the white schools [have] just as much as the coloured schools” (57). He then increases his harshness and shamelessly insults Grant's student’s abilities by saying that “hard work was good for the young body [,] [p]icking cotton, gathering potatoes, pulling onions, working in the garden” (56). Dr. Joseph then attempts to encourage the students by telling them to “work the yards [to] make enough for a dozen toothbrushes in one evening” (58). Undoubtedly, the setting of Grant’s classroom is a direct reflection of the standard of education provided to coloured students. These potentially

Get Access