ELA8 SB U6 L11 LC
Lesson Construction Template
Introduction and Objective
Imagine that a speaker states the following: People should drink tap water instead of bottled water. Bottled water is bad for the environment. In addition, bottled water isn’t necessarily a healthy alternative to tap water.
Do you believe this speaker? Would you quit drinking bottled water based on this speaker’s argument? What would it take for you to believe that bottled water is bad for the environment? What might convince you that bottled water isn’t a healthy alternative to tap water?
Today, we’re going to look at evaluating a speaker’s use of evidence.
Today's lesson objective is:
Students will delineate a speaker’s argument and specific claims
…show more content…
Determine the thesis statement: As an alternative, people should drink tap water, which would reduce litter and save energy.
2. Recognize the claim: Using bottled water contributes to litter.
3. Evaluate the evidence:
➢ The speaker uses a statistic from National Geographic Kids; a statistic can be verified. In addition, National Geographic is a recognized and reputable magazine.
➢ The speaker uses a second statistic from waterproject.org; a statistic can be verified. In addition, it is .org website, meaning that the source is probably reliable.
➢ The speaker states that the Great Pacific Garbage patch consists of plastic garbage; the speaker then blames bottled water as the source for most of this garbage. However, there is no evidence to support this statement. There’s a lot of other plastic waste besides bottled water.
➢ The speaker quotes ecowatch.com, stating that the floating mass is twice the size of Texas with plastic pieces outnumbering sea life six to one. Since it is a .com website, the source is questionable; however, the information presented could easily be verified by searching another source.
4. Conclusion: Though we identified one statement that is questionable, the speaker does use compelling evidence to support the claim that bottled water contributes to
It is assumed that bottled water is much healthier for someone than drinking a soda. (Lauria, 665). “70 percent of bottled water
In the article, the author makes multiple statements against bottled water and supports tap water. Leonard starts by stating advertising companies try to persuade people into thinking tap water is less regulated, does not come from an organic source, and is polluted, so more people would buy their overpriced tap water. The tactic of scaring people into buying bottled water became the bottled water company’s main marketing move. This marketing
Seventy percent of the human body is comprised of water. This makes drinking water quality vital. The EPA estimates the average adult consumes 1.2 liters daily or 115 gallons of community (tap) water daily while the average consumption of bottled water per capita in the U.S. is in excess of 30.8 gallons per year and is expected to continue to increase according to the International Bottled Water Association (IBWA) and the Beverage Marketing Association’s 2013 report. Bottled water costs anywhere from 240 to 10,000 times more per gallon than the average cost of tap, but people’s perception that bottled water is purer, safer or healthier is driven, in part, by strong bottled water marketing campaigns that focus on news reports about crises that involve municipal water supplies. (NRDC, “Bottled Water Pure Drink or Pure Hype”) The sources for both tap and bottled waters as well as additives to either enrich or neutralize contents of water determine the mineral and chemical composition of drinking water. Is bottled water really any purer or healthier than local tap water?
The economy is hurt when people spend money on bottled water, which in fact tastes the same as tap water, but costs much more. Not only do people waste money on water that tastes the same as tap, but they waste money on water that helps destroy the environment. Not only does bottled water cost more, but it takes money away that could be used to help upgrade and provide cleaner tap water. People would like to save money, but they spend it on bottled water which tie in with tap water. “Nearly 40 percent of bottled water is simply filtered water filled in a bottle. Humans pay 1900 times
Billions of gallons of bottled water are consumed in the United States every year. Many Americans choose bottled water for its convenience and say that the taste is much better than tap water. They say tap water is flat and tasteless. Some argue that the cost of bottled water far exceeds the cost of tap water. One study showed that one bottled water per day would cost the consumer $365 per year while the same amount of tap water would cost ten cents. While bottled water is more expensive, it provides over 130,000 jobs resulting in over six billion dollars in salaries for american workers “Bottled Water Matters.” In the article, “ Bad To The Last Drop,” Tom Standage says that bottled water is too expensive and encourages people to stop buying bottled water and give the money to charity. In the article “ In Defense of Bottled Water,” Thomas J. Lauria says that eliminating bottled water would have the unintended consequence of driving people to choose more unhealthy beverages which have thicker plastic bottles and would be worse on the environment. He also says that bottled water is an important choice in situations where there is a lack of tap water or concern about water
Water is essential to life, scientific fact, not debatable (Tracy). More than half of all Americans drink bottled water; about a third of the public consumes it regularly (Olsen). Many drink or buy bottled water simply because they believe it is of better quality, cleaner, and better tasting. On the contrary, several individuals do not know the cons of drinking bottled water. Today, there are many misconceptions and myths about bottled water. Many people are uneducated about what goes into our bottles and how it not only affects us but also our environment. In the article “The New Oil” by Jeneen Interlandi and Ryan Tracy they discuss the issues that have to do with water and the privatization of it. They believe there is a crisis and something has to be done. Due to the cost, pollution, shortage, and health issues, bottled water should be outlawed. Water should not be controlled by water bottle companies and should not be allowed to be sold in plastic bottles.
More than 750,000 pieces of microplastic can be found in just one square kilometer of it. Approximately 80 percent of its debris comes from land, 10 percent is made up of over 700,000 tons of commercial fishing nets, and the remaining 10 percent consists miscellaneous objects discarded by recreational and commercial ships. What is it? The Great Pacific Garbage Patch. The garbage patch lies in the Pacific Ocean between the west coasts of America and the East coasts of Asia. Because the effects on marine life caused by the Great Pacific Garbage Patch are detrimental to their habitat, diet, and
How bottled water is better at school. Bottled water is better for community because it is safer because tap water is in the pipes and that can contain chemicals and bacterias. Another reason why it shouldn’t be banned in school is because you can bring your own water and if you bring your own water bottle you can refill it. Another reason why kids should be allowed to bring bottled water is because you are letting the kids stay hydrated and you don’t have to leave the classroom to get a drink. The last reason why kids should be able to bring bottled water is because you can also
From helping the daily jogger stay hydrated during a run to that mom and family trying to stay hydrated at the amusement park, bottled water has had a lot of good to it. However do those goods outweigh the bad? In “Bottled Water: Friend or Foe?” by Christopher Castillo, Diana Goettsch, Angela Reid, and Catherine Sterling argue bottled water are our worst enemy, reasons being the bottle itself has harming chemicals within it which we are drinking, bottled water damages our environment, and lastly we are spending more on bottled water when we have the same water coming from our sinks.
Gleick supports this argument and cites specific grounds that disprove bottled water companies’ false claims. For example oxygenated water is said to “strengthen your immune system…and even brain function” despite scientific testing done proving that a single breath of air contains more oxygen than the product itself (Gleick 118). Next, the author recalls someone who drank nothing but super-hydrating Penta Water, which cost over sixty dollars a case. This costly expense was proven to be futile, because scientific evidence proved that Penta did not have any health benefits superior to those of ordinary water (Gleick 129). Barnett incorporates a qualifier which states that it is difficult to conclude whether bottled or tap water is healthier. However, this does not take away from the fact that the EPA, which regulates municipal water, is more strict than the FDA is with regulation over bottled water. Bottled water companies claim they intensely purify their products despite this evidence. These seemingly astonishing claims mislead consumers who do not possess the knowledge nor the equipment necessary to test the water themselves. Consumers spend money to purchase products that turn out to have no outstanding health benefits. They may additionally put their health at risk by consuming bottled water which may contain pollutants detrimental to the human body.
Michael Hiltzik’s first section of the article is especially important for individuals to know about. I agree 100% with his opinion on bottle water. There are many environmental dangers and unnecessary expenses for bottled water. Countless people don’t discard of their bottled waters in the recycling or trash bin. Eventually, these plastic dangers end up in the ocean and may put marine life in jeopardy.
One group debates bottle water it's better. According to the article it says “Many Americans say that bottled water tastes better than tap water. They say it is healthier. Some say that bottled water is cleaner.” (P.4) This quote demonstrate that people disagree with tap water and the say that is cleaner and it's healthier.
In “Better Planet Garbage Patch”, Thomas Kostigen tells his experience of traveling to the Eastern Garbage Patch to witness this growing problem first-hand. Kostigen describes this area to be one and a half times the United States with a depth of 100 feet or more (Krostigen). The size of this garbage patch is so massive, encompassing around ten million square miles of the North Pacific Gyre. On the other hand, according to “An Ocean of Plastic”, Doucette claims that nobody knows its exact size or if it has any boundaries at all. (Doucette). Although there have been many estimations on the size
Have you ever had any concerns about bottled water? Do you think that bottled water consumption should be banned? Bottled water is water packed in plastic containers and sold for human consumption (Health Canada, 2013). Currently, the amount of bottled water consumed has increased considerably since many people feel it is safer drinking bottled water than tap water (Parent and Wrong, 2014). According to The Statistics Portal, the global sale of bottled water took a leap from 161, 589 to 181, 608 liters from 2009 to 2011. Only in the United States, each American citizen consumed around 32 gallons of bottled water in 2013, thus meaning an equivalent growth of 15, 94% over 2009 (The Statistics Portal, 2014). In fact, due to good portability, bottled water has been helpful in both simple and complex situations such as daily exercises and natural disasters. Even though having those few considerable advantages, bottled water still have been less beneficial; especially due to the negative impacts in the socio-economic, health and environmental fields.
The Figure 2 presents the quantity of water is consumed by international students every day. In general, these students drank less water in Australia than they did in their own countries. There were 10% and 24% of the sample drank more than 2 liters per day when they were in Australia and their own countries respectively. However, there were