Libertarianism Vs Indeterminism

The existence of free will has often been brought into question. Moral responsibility, the assumed result of free will, has been equally debated. Some philosophers posit that humans possess free will in its entirety. Others believe that, although many aspects of one’s life are predetermined, one still possesses just enough freedom to be morally responsible. However, as one will find, neither approaches are tenable explanations of human decision making. The former concept of free will ignores the

event is caused by something necessary. Their hard determinism is summed up by a quote on page 220, it states: “Naught happens for nothing but everything from a ground of necessity”. They also believe freedom is a falsity. Now to compare, the Mythos vs. Logos debate, where mythos relate the beginnings of the world to supernatural origins. The opposing side to mythos is logos. Logos are the rational term developed by Plato, it gives rational explanations to how the world became what it is today. These

Free Will vs. Determinism What determines and influences human behavior? Humans have been looking the answer for this question during several eras, thus they developed various theories attempting to explain human behavior. Determinism is the belief that one event is the consequence of a previous action, similar to a chain. According to some philosophers who support determinism, the will of an agent follows physical laws, and every action is explicable and predictable by physical conditions. By this