Locke And Hobbes Similarities

John Locke and Thomas Hobbes are one of the most influential and famous philosophers who both had similar theories but had different conclusions. The two philosophers wrote a discourse “life in the state of nature” and argued about the government. They both had made important and logical contributions to modern philosophy and opened up political thoughts which have impacted our world today. During the seventeenth century the thought of political philosophy became a big topic. John Locke and Thomas Hobbes both started questioning the political philosophy and had had different views and reasoning towards human beings. Both Hobbes and Locke had logical and reasonable theories in which they had opposed to one another. Although each philosopher

Thomas Hobbes and john Locke were both enlightment philosophers who use the state of nature as a formula in political philosophy. Both Locke and Hobbes had tried to influence by their sociopolitical background, “to expose the man as he was before the advent of the social life” (). Locke and Hobbes addressed man’s relation to the society around him; however, they came to different conclusions regarding the nature of human government.

Contrasting Hobbes and Locke Nearly two-hundred and twenty-five years ago the United States of America chose to fight a Thomas Hobbes government, with the hope of forming a John Locke institution. The ideas of these men lead to the formation of two of the strongest nations in the history of the world: Great Britain followed by the United States. Thomas Hobbes viewed the ideal government as an absolute monarchy, due to the chaos of the state of nature in contrast, John Locke’s ideal government was a democracy due to his beliefs of the equality of men. These men have shared a few of the same beliefs, but mainly contrast each other.

The formation of government is one of the central themes for both Hobbes and Locke. Whether or not men naturally form a government, or must form a government, is based on man’s basic nature. According to Hobbes, a government must be formed to preserve life and prevent loss of property. According to Locke, a government arises to protect life and property. Governments are born of inequality and formed to administer equality.

In conclusion, John Locke and Thomas Hobbes both had different views on government. Locke believed that people should have rights while Hobbes believed otherwise. John Locke’s views were more effective that

John Locke and Thomas Hobbes were two main political philosophers during the seventeenth century. Hobbes is largely known for his writing of the “Leviathan”, and Locke for authoring "An Essay Concerning Human Understanding." Included in their essays, both men discuss the purpose and structure of government, natural law, and the characteristics of man in and out of the state of nature. The two men's opinion of man vary widely. Hobbes sees man as being evil, whereas Locke views man in a much more optimistic light. While in the state of nature and under natural law, they both agree that man is equal. However, their ideas of natural law differ

Characters: Thomas Hobbes, John Locke , Thomas Jefferson John Locke: Hello,Thanks for coming to this event ,The purpose of the meeting is about the government. I think that the Best Government would be democracy because I believe that all people are born with the natural right of life liberty and property. Thomas Hobbes:No!! I do not agree with this type of government because, the basic nature of man is bad! John Locke:

Both men had very strong opinions on how we as humans, and how government, should be run. My paragraph is on the views of, John Locke, and Thomas Hobbes. During the time they lived civil war raged on in Great Britain, and this was where their views on human beings developed. Thomas Hobbes originally coming from a family that strongly believed that absolute monarchy, was influenced by the English civil war. John Locke, on the other hand, believed that people should always have a say in who runs things, and also have the right to rebel against tyrants.

The English revolutionaries, found in Parliament, believed that kings were subject to be law as well as them, and followed a principled course in order to These revolutionaries had certain principles they followed, and people who preached principles. Thomas Hobbes, who believed in absolutism, and constitutionalism, and John Locke, who preached for national rights . Throughout the years, there are many different arguments between kings and Parliament over these principles. The first argument arose with James I and Parliament in 1597. The second arose with Charles I and Parliament in .

I believe both Hobbes and Locke are similar in the way that both of their theories are based on the natural state of human, a situation where everyone is entirely free because there is no interference of laws, but where man fears for their survival on a daily bases. They both agreed that a ruler of some sort appeared absolutely necessary for people, without

John Locke and Thomas Hobbes were two very different philosophical geniuses of their time. One could say that they were a result of their era; Locke wrote after the Revolution of 1688, an almost bloodless revolution for a constitutionalized government. On the other hand, Hobbes wrote during the interregnum between the rules of King Charles I and King Charles II about how the government should be in complete control of its people. Locke believed that oppressed people have a right to rebel against the government, and the people should be more in charge of the government. Meanwhile, Hobbes thought that the government was there to intimidate people to keep us from killing each other and overthrowing the government. Despite the almost polar

These men began with different views of the world, which lead them to very different conclusions, and summarily, very different recommendations for government. Both Locke and Hobbes were well educated, scientifically grounded citizens of England, shortly after the collapse of the “Divine Right of Kings. ”Having an interest in philosophical politics, they ran similar hypothetical situations on man to determine the best

The major difference I see between Hobbes and Locke is the difference in social contact, Hobbes believes that if you live by the book and only do as you are told then, you you will not face any consequinces as long as you never do anything that you were not specifically told to do. Locke however, believes that one may always do right but, having one wrong makes you lose all right to retribution of the crimes you commit.

In contrast to Hobbes’ pessimistic outlook, Locke places trust in the goodness of human nature. “This equality of men by nature . . . [obligates] mutual love amongst men, on which he builds the duties they owe one another . . . the great maxims of justice and charity” (Locke 8). While Hobbesian equality turns men against each another in the pursuit of similar desires, Locke’s state of equality encourages charity. Locke believes human nature freely shares itself with others: “Every one, as he is bound to preserve himself . . . ought he, to preserve the rest of mankind” (Locke 8). As much as one wishes to fulfill his own needs, he also

Compare and contrast Hobbes’s and Locke’s views of the state of nature and the fundamental purpose of political society. Whose view is the more plausible? Why?